bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kenna, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Kenna, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Distinct prefrontal-amygdala connectivity drives consolidated fear memories

Elucidating the neuronal circuitry that underpins memory formation is critical to understanding how organisms use past experience to guide adaptive behaviour. While memory formation has long been framed as the reactivation of a static ensemble of neurons established during initial learning, growing evidence suggests that memory traces are highly dynamic and undergo substantial reorganisation during consolidation. During the formation of auditory fear memory, initial acquisition is primarily mediated by the basolateral amygdala (BLA), whereas long-term expression relies on the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). However, the circuit motifs that coordinate this systemic redistribution remain poorly understood. Here, using targeted anatomical tracing and electrophysiology, we show that the reciprocal connectivity between the mPFC and BLA is organised as a parallel topography along the rostro-caudal axis. Leveraging this novel anatomical understanding of reciprocal communication between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex, we reveal an underlying circuitry mechanism by which fear memory traces are redistributed into subcortical-cortical networks after learning. Using activity-dependent engram capture and optogenetic manipulation, we demonstrate that post-learning engagement of a distinct sub-circuit linking the rostral BLA and rostral mPFC is a hallmark of the consolidated fear memory. These insights reveal that the consolidated engram requires the targeted engagement of a post-learning engram circuit, rather than a simple reactivation of neurons engaged during initial learning.

neuroscience↗

ClinGen Expert Clinical Validity Curation of 164 Hearing Loss Gene-Disease Pairs

PurposeProper interpretation of genomic variants is critical to successful medical decision making based on genetic testing results. A fundamental prerequisite to accurate variant interpretation is the clear understanding of the clinical validity of gene-disease relationships. The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) has developed a semi-quantitative framework to assign clinical validity to gene-disease relationships. MethodsThe ClinGen Hearing Loss Gene Curation Expert Panel (HL GCEP) uses this framework to perform evidence-based curations of genes present on testing panels from 17 clinical laboratories in the Genetic Testing Registry. The HL GCEP curated and reviewed 142 genes and 164 gene-disease pairs, including 105 nonsyndromic and 59 syndromic forms of hearing loss. ResultsThe final outcome included 82 Definitive (50%), 12 Strong (7%), 25 Moderate (15%), 32 Limited (20%), 10 Disputed (6%), and 3 Refuted (2%) classifications. The summary of each curation is date stamped with the HL GCEP approval, is live, and will be kept up-to-date on the ClinGen website (https://search.clinicalgenome.org/kb/gene-validity). ConclusionThis gene curation approach serves to optimize the clinical sensitivity of genetic testing while reducing the rate of uncertain or ambiguous test results caused by the interrogation of genes with insufficient evidence of a disease link.

genomics↗

Consensus interpretation of the Met34Thr and Val37Ile variants in GJB2 by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel

PURPOSEPathogenic variants in GJB2 are the most common cause of autosomal recessive sensorineural hearing loss. The classification of c.101T>C/p.Met34Thr and c.109G>A/p.Val37Ile in GJB2 are controversial. Therefore, an expert consensus is required for the interpretation of these two variants.\n\nMETHODSThe ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel (HL-EP) collected published data and shared unpublished information from participating laboratories regarding the two variants. Functional, computational, allelic, and segregation data were also obtained.\n\nRESULTSThe panel reviewed the synthesized information, and classified the Met34Thr and Val37Ile variants according to professional variant interpretation guidelines. We found that Met34Thr and Val37Ile are significantly overrepresented in hearing loss patients, compared to the general population. Met34Thr or Val37Ile homozygotes or compound heterozygotes typically manifest mild to moderate hearing loss. Several other types of evidence also support pathogenic roles for those two variants.\n\nCONCLUSIONResolving controversies in variant classification requires coordinated effort among a panel of international multi-institutional experts to share data, standardize classification rules, review evidence, and reach a consensus. The ClinGen HL-EP concluded that Met34Thr and Val37Ile variants in GJB2 are pathogenic for autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss with variable expressivity and age-dependent penetrance.

genetics↗

Expert Specification of the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for Genetic Hearing Loss

Due to the high genetic heterogeneity of hearing loss, current clinical testing includes sequencing large numbers of genes, which often yields a significant number of novel variants. Therefore, the standardization of variant interpretation is crucial to provide consistent and accurate diagnoses. The Hearing Loss Variant Curation Expert Panel was created within the Clinical Genome Resource to provide expert guidance for standardized genomic interpretation in the context of hearing loss. As one of its major tasks, our Expert Panel has adapted the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants in hearing loss genes. Here, we provide a comprehensive illustration of the newly specified ACMG/AMP hearing loss rules. Three rules remained unchanged, four rules were removed, and the remaining twenty-one rules were specified. Of the specified rules, four had general recommendations, seven were gene/disease considerations, seven had strength-level specifications, and three rules had both gene/disease and strength-level specifications. These rules were further validated and refined using a pilot set of 51 variants assessed by curators. These hearing loss-specific ACMG/AMP rules will help standardize variant interpretation, ultimately leading to better care for individuals with hearing loss.\n\nGRANT NUMBERSResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) under award number U41HG006834.

genetics↗