bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Keffer, J. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Keffer, J. L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Microbial magnetite oxidation via MtoAB porin-multiheme cytochrome complex in Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1

Most of Earths iron is mineral-bound, but it is unclear how and to what extent iron-oxidizing microbes can use solid minerals as electron donors. A prime candidate for studying mineral-oxidizing growth and pathways is Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1, a robust, facultative iron oxidizer with multiple possible iron oxidation mechanisms. These include Cyc2 and Mto pathways plus other multiheme cytochromes and cupredoxins, and so we posit that the mechanisms may correspond to different Fe(II) sources. Here, S. lithotrophicus ES-1 was grown on dissolved Fe(II)-citrate and magnetite. S. lithotrophicus ES-1 oxidized all dissolved Fe2+ released from magnetite, and continued to build biomass when only solid Fe(II) remained, suggesting it can utilize magnetite as a solid electron donor. Quantitative proteomic analyses of S. lithotrophicus ES-1 grown on these substrates revealed global proteome remodeling in response to electron donor and growth state and uncovered potential proteins and metabolic pathways involved in the oxidation of solid magnetite. While the Cyc2 iron oxidases were highly expressed on both dissolved and solid substrates, MtoA was only detected during growth on solid magnetite, suggesting this protein helps catalyze oxidation of solid minerals in S. lithotrophicus ES-1. A set of cupredoxin domain-containing proteins were also specifically expressed during solid iron oxidation. This work demonstrated the iron oxidizer S. lithotrophicus ES-1 utilized additional extracellular electron transfer pathways when growing on solid mineral electron donors compared to dissolved Fe(II). ImportanceMineral-bound iron could be a vast source of energy to iron-oxidizing bacteria, but there is limited physiological evidence of this metabolism, and it has been unknown whether the mechanisms of solid and dissolved Fe(II) oxidation are distinct. In iron-reducing bacteria, multiheme cytochromes can facilitate iron mineral reduction, and here, we link a multiheme cytochrome-based pathway to mineral oxidation, expanding the known functionality of multiheme cytochromes. Given the growing recognition of microbial oxidation of minerals and cathodes, increasing our understanding of these mechanisms will allow us to recognize and trace the activities of mineral-oxidizing microbes. This work shows how solid iron minerals can promote microbial growth, which if widespread, could be a major agent of geologic weathering and mineral-fueled nutrient cycling in sediments, aquifers, and rock-hosted environments.

microbiology↗

Gallionellaceae pangenomic analysis reveals insight into phylogeny, metabolic flexibility, and iron oxidation mechanisms

The iron-oxidizing Gallionellaceae drive a wide variety of biogeochemical cycles through their metabolisms and biominerals. To better understand the environmental impacts of Gallionellaceae, we need to improve our knowledge of their diversity and metabolisms, especially any novel iron oxidation mechanisms. Here, we used a pangenomic analysis of 103 genomes to resolve Gallionellaceae phylogeny and explore the range of genomic potential. Using a concatenated ribosomal protein tree and key gene patterns, we determined Gallionellaceae has four genera, divided into two groups-iron-oxidizing bacteria (FeOB) Gallionella, Sideroxydans, and Ferriphaselus with known iron oxidases (Cyc2, MtoA) and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) Candidatus Nitrotoga with nitrite oxidase (Nxr). The FeOB and NOB have similar electron transport chains, including genes for reverse electron transport and carbon fixation. Auxiliary energy metabolisms including S oxidation, denitrification, and organotrophy were scattered throughout the Gallionellaceae FeOB. Within FeOB, we found genes that may represent adaptations for iron oxidation, including a variety of extracellular electron uptake (EEU) mechanisms. FeOB genomes encoded more predicted c-type cytochromes overall, notably more multiheme c-type cytochromes (MHCs) with >10 CXXCH motifs. These include homologs of several predicted outer membrane porin-MHC complexes, including MtoAB and Uet. MHCs are known to efficiently conduct electrons across longer distances and function across a wide range of redox potentials that overlap with mineral redox potentials, which can help expand the range of usable iron substrates. Overall, the results of pangenome analyses suggest that the Gallionellaceae genera Gallionella, Sideroxydans, and Ferriphaselus are primarily iron oxidizers, capable of oxidizing dissolved Fe2+ as well as a range of solid iron or other mineral substrates. ImportanceNeutrophilic iron-oxidizing bacteria (FeOB) produce copious iron (oxyhydr)oxides that can profoundly influence biogeochemical cycles, notably the fate of carbon and many metals. To fully understand environmental microbial iron oxidation, we need a thorough accounting of iron oxidation mechanisms. In this study we show the Gallionellaceae FeOB have both known iron oxidases as well as uncharacterized multiheme cytochromes (MHCs). MHCs are predicted to transfer electrons from extracellular substrates and likely confer metabolic capabilities that help Gallionellaceae occupy a range of different iron- and mineral-rich niches. Gallionellaceae appear to specialize in iron oxidation, so it makes sense that they would have multiple mechanisms to oxidize various forms of iron, given the many iron minerals on Earth, as well as the physiological and kinetic challenges faced by FeOB. The multiple iron/mineral oxidation mechanisms may help drive the widespread ecological success of Gallionellaceae.

microbiology↗

Unraveling Fe(II)-oxidizing mechanisms in a facultative Fe(II) oxidizer Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1 via culturing, transcriptomics, and RT-qPCR

Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1 grows autotrophically either by Fe(II) oxidation or thiosulfate oxidation, in contrast to most other neutrophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria (FeOB) isolates. This provides a unique opportunity to explore the physiology of a facultative FeOB and constrain the genes specific to Fe(II) oxidation. We compared the growth of S. lithotrophicus ES-1 on Fe(II), thiosulfate, and both substrates together. While initial growth rates were similar, thiosulfate-grown cultures had higher yield with or without Fe(II) present, which may give ES-1 an advantage over obligate FeOB. To investigate the Fe(II) and S oxidation pathways, we conducted transcriptomics experiments, validated with RT-qPCR. We explored the long-term gene expression response at different growth phases (over days-week) and expression changes during a short-term switch from thiosulfate to Fe(II) (90 min). The dsr and sox sulfur oxidation genes were upregulated in thiosulfate cultures. The Fe(II) oxidase gene cyc2 was among the top expressed genes during both Fe(II) and thiosulfate oxidation, and addition of Fe(II) to thiosulfate-grown cells caused an increase in cyc2 expression. These results support the role of Cyc2 as the Fe(II) oxidase and suggest that ES-1 maintains readiness to oxidize Fe(II) even in the absence of Fe(II). We used gene expression profiles to further constrain the ES-1 Fe(II) oxidation pathway. Notably, among the most highly upregulated genes during Fe(II) oxidation were genes for alternative complex III, reverse electron transport and carbon fixation. This implies a direct connection between Fe(II) oxidation and carbon fixation, suggesting that CO2 is an important electron sink for Fe(II) oxidation. ImportanceNeutrophilic FeOB are increasingly observed in various environments, but knowledge of their ecophysiology and Fe(II) oxidation mechanisms is still relatively limited. Sideroxydans are widely observed in aquifers, wetlands, and sediments, and genome analysis suggests metabolic flexibility contributes to their success. The type strain ES-1 is unusual amongst neutrophilic FeOB isolates as it can grow on either Fe(II) or a non-Fe(II) substrate, thiosulfate. Almost all our knowledge of neutrophilic Fe(II) oxidation pathways comes from genome analyses, with some work on metatranscriptomes. This study used culture-based experiments to test the genes specific to Fe(II) oxidation in a facultative FeOB and refine our model of the Fe(II) oxidation pathway. We gained insight into how facultative FeOB like ES-1 connect Fe, S, and C biogeochemical cycling in the environment, and suggest a multi-gene indicator would improve understanding of Fe(II) oxidation activity in environments with facultative FeOB.

microbiology↗