Biology subjects

Kasamoto, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Kasamoto, J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

TranslAGE: A Comprehensive Platform for Systematic Validation of Epigenetic Aging Biomarkers

Epigenetic clocks are powerful biomarkers of biological aging, however, their performance varies across studies and contexts. Current limitations include siloed datasets, inconsistent validation methods, and the absence of a standardized framework for systematic comparison. Here, we introduce TranslAGE: a publicly available online resource that addresses this gap by harmonizing 179 human blood DNA methylation datasets and precalculating a suite of 41 epigenetic biomarker scores for each of the >42,000 total samples. Users can explore these data through interactive dashboards that evaluate four fundamental performance domains: Stability, Treatment response, Associations, and Risk, collectively forming the STAR framework. Stability quantifies robustness to multiple types of technical and biological noise. Treatment response measures biomarker sensitivity to aging interventions and environmental exposures. Associations capture cross-sectional relationships with age, demographics, disease, and other phenotypes, and Risk assesses predictive power for future functional decline, morbidity and mortality. The STAR framework unifies these test metrics into a single composite scoring system that enables researchers to identify, benchmark, and validate biomarkers best suited to their scientific or clinical applications. TranslAGE will be continually updated, with rapid scaling by adding datasets, biomarkers, or analyses. By providing harmonized datasets, precomputed biomarker scores, and interactive data tools, TranslAGE establishes the first standardized, reproducible framework for benchmarking epigenetic aging biomarkers across populations, and accelerates the translation toward clinical use.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2025

Beyond the Genotype: A Multi-Omic Analysis of APOEe4's Role in Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimers disease (AD) is characterized by widespread molecular dysregulation, with the APOEe4 allele recognized as its strongest genetic risk factor. However, the mechanisms by which APOEe4 drives distinct molecular changes - whether by exacerbating pathology or triggering compensatory responses - remain incompletely understood. We generated and analyzed proteomic, epigenetic, and genetic data from post-mortem dorsolateral prefrontal cortex samples of a uniquely APOEe4-enriched subset of the Religious Orders Study and Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP). Specifically, we generated DIA LC-MS proteomic data (n = 302), analyzed previously generated DNA methylation profiles from our group (n = 310), and used published whole-genome sequencing data (n = 254) to compute polygenic risk scores (PRS). In this cohort, 69% (n = 214) were APOEe4 carriers, and 19.6% (n = 42) of them showed no pathological evidence of AD based on NIA-Reagan criteria, enabling identification of APOEe4-related risk and resilience mechanisms. In the absence of AD, APOEe4 carriers exhibited lower levels of 27 proteins, suggesting early synaptic (e.g., VAMP1, SYN3, CASKIN1) and metabolic (e.g., GLUD1, PI4KA) vulnerability. By contrast, APOEe4 carriers with AD displayed marked upregulation of inflammatory and proteostatic proteins (e.g., GNAO1, AHNAK, FGG, HEBP1, APEX1, RAB4A, SLC12A5, LRP1, BAG6) and hypermethylation of cg06329447 in ELAVL4. Network analyses highlighted convergent disruptions in synaptic transmission, metabolism, and proteostasis - key pathways altered in APOEe4-associated AD. Mediation analyses identified GRIPAP1 and GSTK1 as top protein mediators (accounting for [~]26-33% of APOEe4s effect), with VAMP1, CASKIN1, DPP3, SYN3, and FGG each contributing [~]9-15%. ELAVL4 hypermethylation also mediated [~]12% of the APOEe4 effect, linking epigenetic dysregulation to disease risk. To assess whether the identified proteins reflected broader genetic risk for AD or were specific to APOEe4, we calculated PRS both excluding and including the APOE genomic region. While the non-APOE PRS showed no association with identified molecular markers, the APOE-inclusive PRS was significantly associated with eight AD-related proteins in carriers, indicating they are not explained by polygenic risk outside of APOE. Finally, predictive modeling stratified by APOEe4 status revealed that in non-carriers, PRS most effectively classified AD (AUC = 0.73), whereas in carriers, proteomic and epigenetic markers outperformed PRS (AUC up to 0.74). Together, these findings demonstrate that APOEe4 confers AD risk through early synaptic and metabolic disruptions and later-stage inflammatory and epigenetic changes, laying the groundwork for genotype-tailored biomarker development and therapeutic strategies. VISUAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=156 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/682426v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (31K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1477a2forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a6d173org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1010821org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bcde3a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

pathology↗

bioRxiv2024

When to Trust Epigenetic Clocks: Avoiding False Positives in Aging Interventions.

Recent human studies have suggested that aging interventions can reduce aging biomarkers related to morbidity and mortality risk. Such biomarkers may potentially serve as early, rapid indicators of effects on healthspan. An increasing number of studies are measuring intervention effects on epigenetic clocks, commonly used aging biomarkers based on DNA methylation profiles. However, with dozens of clocks to choose from, different clocks may not agree on the effect of an intervention. Furthermore, changes in some clocks may simply be the result of technical noise causing a false positive result. To address these issues, we measured the variability between 6 popular epigenetic clocks across a range of longitudinal datasets containing either an aging intervention or an age-accelerating event. We further compared them to the same clocks re-trained to have high test-retest reliability. We find the newer generation of clocks, trained on mortality or rate-of-aging, capture aging events more reliably than those clocks trained on chronological age, as these show consistent effects (or lack thereof) across multiple clocks including high-reliability versions, and including after multiple testing correction. In contrast, clocks trained on chronological age frequently show sporadic changes that are not replicable when using high-reliability versions of those same clocks, or when using newer generations of clocks and these results do not survive multiple-testing correction. These are likely false positive results, and we note that some of these clock changes were previously published, suggesting the literature should be re-examined. This work lays the foundation for future clinical trials that aim to measure aging interventions with epigenetic clocks, by establishing when to attribute a given change in biological age to a bona fide change in the aging process.

genomics↗