bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kapust, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Kapust, N..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Anomalous phylogenetic behavior of ribosomal proteins in metagenome assembled genomes

Metagenomic studies have claimed the existence of novel lineages with unprecedented properties never before observed in prokaryotes. Such lineages include Asgard archaea1-3, which are purported to represent archaea with eukaryotic cell complexity, and the Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR), a novel domain level taxon erected solely on the basis of metagenomic data4. However, it has escaped the attention of most biologists that these metagenomic sequences are not assembled into genomes by sequence overlap, as for cultured archaea and bacteria. Instead, short contigs are sorted into computer files by a process called binning in which they receive taxonomic assignment on the basis of sequence properties like GC content, dinucleotide frequencies, and stoichiometric co-occurrence across samples. Consequently, they are not genome sequences as we know them, reflecting the gene content of real organisms. Rather they are metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs). Debates that Asgard data are contaminated with individual eukaryotic sequences5-7 are overshadowed by the more pressing issue that no evidence exists to indicate that any sequences in binned Asgard MAGs actually stem from the same chromosome, as opposed to simply stemming from the same environment. Here we show that Asgard and CPR MAGs fail spectacularly to meet the most basic phylogenetic criterion8 fulfilled by genome sequences of all cultured prokaryotes investigated to date: the ribosomal proteins of Asgard and CPR MAGs do not share common evolutionary histories. Their phylogenetic behavior is anomalous to a degree never observed with genomes of real organisms. CPR and Asgard MAGs are binning artefacts, assembled from environments where up to 90% of the DNA is from dead cells9-12. Asgard and CPR MAGs are unnatural constructs, genome-like patchworks of genes that have been stitched together into computer files by binning.

evolutionary biology↗

Count does not recover major events of gene flux in real biological data

In prokaryotes, known mechanisms of lateral gene transfer (transformation, transduction, conjugation and gene transfer agents) generate new combinations of genes among chromosomes during evolution. In eukaryotes, whose host lineage is descended from archaea, lateral gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus occurs at endosymbiotic events. Recent genome analyses studying gene distributions have uncovered evidence for sporadic, discontinuous events of gene transfer from bacteria to archaea during evolution. Other studies have used traditional birth-and-death phylogenetic models to investigate prokaryote genome evolution to claim that gene transfer to archaea was continuous during evolution, rather than involving occasional periodic mass gene influx events. Here we test the ability of Count, a birth-and-death based program, to recover known events of mass acquisition and differential loss using plastid genomes and eukaryotic protein families that were acquired from plastids. Count showed a strong bias towards reconstructed histories having gene acquisitions distributed uniformly across the tree. Sometimes as many as nine different acquisitions by plastid DNA were inferred for the same protein family. That is, Count recovered gradual and continuous lateral gene transfer among lineages, even when massive gains followed by gradual differential loss is the true evolutionary process that generated the gene distribution data.

evolutionary biology↗