Biology subjects

Kaptoge, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Kaptoge, S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2020

Genetic Analyses of Blood Cell Structure for Biological and Pharmacological Inference

Thousands of genetic associations with phenotypes of blood cells are known, but few are with phenotypes relevant to cell function. We performed GWAS of 63 flow-cytometry phenotypes, including measures of cell granularity, nucleic acid content, and reactivity, in 39,656 participants in the INTERVAL study, identifying 2,172 variant-trait associations. These include associations mediated by functional cellular structures such as secretory granules, implicated in vascular, thrombotic, inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. By integrating our results with epigenetic data and with signals from molecular abundance/disease GWAS, we infer the hematopoietic origins of population phenotypic variation and identify the transcription factor FOG2 as a regulator of platelet -granularity. We show how flow cytometry genetics can suggest cell types mediating complex disease risk and suggest efficacious drug targets, presenting Daclizumab/Vedolizumab in autoimmune disease as positive controls. Finally, we add to existing evidence supporting IL7/IL7-R as drug targets for multiple sclerosis.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Use of polygenic risk scores and other molecular markers to enhance cardiovascular risk prediction: Prospective cohort study and modelling analysis

BackgroundThere is debate about the value of adding information on genetic and other molecular markers to conventional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk predictors.\n\nMethodsUsing data on 306,654 individuals without a history of CVD from UK Biobank, we calculated measures of risk-discrimination and reclassification upon addition of polygenic risk scores (PRS) and a panel of 27 clinical biochemistry markers to a conventional risk prediction model (i.e., including age, sex, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, history of diabetes, total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol). We then modelled implications of initiating guideline-recommended statin therapy after the assessment of molecular markers for a UK primary-care setting.\n\nFindingsThe C-index was 0.710 (95% CI, 0.703-0.717) for a CVD prediction model containing conventional risk predictors alone. The C-index increased by similar amounts when adding information on PRS or biochemistry markers (0.011 and 0.014, respectively; P<0.001), and it increased still further (0.022; P<0.001) when information on both was combined. Among cases and controls, continuous net reclassification improvements were about 12% and 19%, respectively, when both PRS and biochemistry markers were added. If PRS and biochemistry markers were to be assessed in the entire primary care population aged 40-75, then it could help prevent one additional CVD event for every 893 individuals screened. By contrast, targeted assessment only among people at intermediate (i.e., 5-10%) 10-year CVD risk could help prevent one additional CVD event for every 233 individuals screened. This targeted strategy could help reclassify 16% of the intermediate-risk group to the high-risk (i.e., [≥]10%) category, preventing 11% more CVD events than conventional risk prediction.\n\nInterpretationAdding information on both PRS and selected biochemistry markers moderately enhanced CVD predictive accuracy and could improve primary prevention of CVD. However, our modelling suggested that targeted assessment of molecular markers among individuals at intermediate-risk would be more efficient than blanket approaches.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

An Atlas of Human and Murine Genetic Influences on Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a common debilitating chronic disease diagnosed primarily using bone mineral density (BMD). We undertook a comprehensive assessment of human genetic determinants of bone density in 426,824 individuals, identifying a total of 518 genome-wide significant loci, (301 novel), explaining 20% of the total variance in BMD--as estimated by heel quantitative ultrasound (eBMD). Next, meta-analysis identified 13 bone fracture loci in ~1.2M individuals, which were also associated with BMD. We then identified target genes from cell-specific genomic landscape features, including chromatin conformation and accessible chromatin sites, that were strongly enriched for genes known to influence bone density and strength (maximum odds ratio = 58, P = 10-75). We next performed rapid throughput skeletal phenotyping of 126 knockout mice lacking eBMD Target Genes and showed that these mice had an increased frequency of abnormal skeletal phenotypes compared to 526 unselected lines (P < 0.0001). In-depth analysis of one such Target Gene, DAAM2, showed a disproportionate decrease in bone strength relative to mineralization. This comprehensive human and murine genetic atlas provides empirical evidence testing how to link associated SNPs to causal genes, offers new insights into osteoporosis pathophysiology and highlights opportunities for drug development.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

Genomic risk prediction of coronary artery disease in nearly 500,000 adults: implications for early screening and primary prevention

BackgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) has substantial heritability and a polygenic architecture; however, genomic risk scores have not yet leveraged the totality of genetic information available nor been externally tested at population-scale to show potential utility in primary prevention.\n\nMethodsUsing a meta-analytic approach to combine large-scale genome-wide and targeted genetic association data, we developed a new genomic risk score for CAD (metaGRS), consisting of 1.7 million genetic variants. We externally tested metaGRS, individually and in combination with available conventional risk factors, in 22,242 CAD cases and 460,387 non-cases from UK Biobank.\n\nFindingsIn UK Biobank, a standard deviation increase in metaGRS had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.71 (95% CI 1.68-1.73) for CAD, greater than any other externally tested genetic risk score. Individuals in the top 20% of the metaGRS distribution had a HR of 4.17 (95% CI 3.97-4.38) compared with those in the bottom 20%. The metaGRS had higher C-index (C=0.623, 95% CI 0.615-0.631) for incident CAD than any of four conventional factors (smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and body mass index), and addition of the metaGRS to a model of conventional risk factors increased C-index by 3.7%. In individuals on lipid-lowering or anti-hypertensive medications at recruitment, metaGRS hazard for incident CAD was significantly but only partially attenuated with HR of 2.83 (95% CI 2.61- 3.07) between the top and bottom 20% of the metaGRS distribution.\n\nInterpretationRecent genetic association studies have yielded enough information to meaningfully stratify individuals using the metaGRS for CAD risk in both early and later life, thus enabling targeted primary intervention in combination with conventional risk factors. The metaGRS effect was partially attenuated by lipid and blood pressure-lowering medication, however other prevention strategies will be required to fully benefit from earlier genomic risk stratification.\n\nFundingNational Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, British Heart Foundation, Australian Heart Foundation.

genetics↗