bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Kamel, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Kamel, B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Transcriptional responses of Biomphalaria pfeifferi and Schistosoma mansoni following exposure to niclosamide, with evidence for a synergistic effect on snails following exposure to both stressors

BackgroundSchistosomiasis is one of the worlds most common NTDs. Successful control operations often target snail vectors with the molluscicide niclosamide. Little is known about how niclosamide affects snails, including for Biomphalaria pfeifferi, the most important vector for Schistosoma mansoni in Africa. We used Illumina technology to explore how field-derived B. pfeifferi, either uninfected or harboring cercariae-producing S. mansoni sporocysts, respond to a sublethal exposure of niclosamide. This study afforded the opportunity to determine if snails respond differently to biotic or abiotic stressors, and if they reserve unique responses for when presented with both stressors in combination. We also examined how sporocysts respond when their snail host is exposed to niclosamide.\n\nPrincipal FindingsCercariae-producing sporocysts within snails exposed to niclosamide express ~68% of the genes in the S. mansoni genome, as compared to 66% expressed by intramolluscan stages of S. mansoni in snails not exposed to niclosamide. Niclosamide does not disable sporocysts nor does it seem to provoke from them distinctive responses associated with detoxifying a xenobiotic. For B. pfeifferi, niclosamide treatment alone increases expression of several features not up-regulated in infected snails including particular cytochrome p450s and heat shock proteins, glutathione-S-transferases, antimicrobial factors like LBP/BPI and protease inhibitors, and also provokes strong down regulation of proteases. Exposure of infected snails to niclosamide resulted in numerous up-regulated responses associated with apoptosis along with down-regulated ribosomal and defense functions, indicative of a distinctive, compromised state not achieved with either stimulus alone.\n\nConclusions/SignificanceThis study helps define the transcriptomic responses of an important and under-studied schistosome vector to S. mansoni sporocysts, to niclosamide, and to both in combination. It suggests the response of S. mansoni sporocysts to niclosamide is minimal and not reflective of a distinct repertoire of genes to handle xenobiotics while in the snail host. It also offers new insights for how niclosamide affects snails.\n\nAuthorS SummarySchistosomaisis control programs often employ the use of chemical molluscicides, such as niclosamide, to control the obligatory intermediate snail hosts. Despite its widespread use, we know little about how niclosamide affects snails like Biomphalaria pfeifferi, the most important vector Schistosoma mansoni in Africa. By sequencing the transcriptomes of uninfected and S. mansoni-infected B. pfeifferi exposed to niclosamide, we analyze the snails response to both biotic and abiotic stressors. We can also examine the response of S. mansoni to niclosamide exposure during intramolluscan development. Biomphalaria pfeifferi snails exposed only to niclosamide showed unique up-regulation of stress and defense-related transcripts not seen in snails infected with a biotic, like S. mansoni infection, alone. Schistosoma mansoni-infected B. pfeifferi exposed to niclosamide were clearly unable to regulate normal metabolic and detoxification processes. Cercariae-producing sporocysts within snails exposed to niclosamide are largely unaffected and continue to produce transcripts required for cercariae production.

molecular biology

Persistent hotspots of Schistosoma mansoni transmission in the Kenyan waters of Lake Victoria: a search for snail-related answers beneath the waves

Following a four-year annual praziquantel treatment campaign the resulting prevalence of S. mansoni was seen to differ among individual villages along the Kenyan shore of Lake Victoria. We have investigated possible inherent differences in snail-related aspects of transmission among such 10 villages, including six persistent hotspot (PHS) villages ([≤]30% reduction in prevalence following repeated treatments) located along the west-facing shore of the lake, and four PZQ-responding (RESP) villages (>30% prevalence reduction following repeated treatment) along Winam Gulf. When taking into account all sampling sites and times and water hyacinth presence/absence, shoreline-associated B. sudanica from PHS and RESP villages did not differ in relative abundance or prevalence of S. mansoni infection. Water hyacinth intrusions were associated with increased B. sudanica abundance. The deeper water snail Biomphalaria choanomphala was significantly more abundant in the PHS villages and prevalence of S. mansoni among villages both before and after control was positively correlated with B. choanomphala abundance. Worm recoveries from sentinel mice did not differ between PHS and RESP villages, and abundance of non-schistosome trematode species was not associated with S. mansoni abundance. Biomphalaria choanomphala provides an alternative, deepwater mode of transmission that may favor greater persistence of S. mansoni in PHS villages. As we found evidence for ongoing S. mansoni transmission in all 10 villages, we conclude conditions conducive for transmission and reinfection occur ubiquitously. This argues for an integrated, basin-wide plan for schistosomiasis control to counteract rapid reinfections facilitated by large snail populations and movements of infected people around the lake.

epidemiology