Biology subjects

Kaestner, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Kaestner, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Noise Optimization of Basic Signal Component Extraction for Cryogenic and On-Scalp Magnetoencephalography (MEG)

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measures human neural activity non-invasively with spatio-temporal precision, and has been foundational in enabling impactful discoveries in cognitive neuroscience. New on-scalp MEG sensor technologies, such as OPM-MEG, offer the opportunity to capture more information about the neuronal magnetic fields with higher sensitivity to more complex, higher order spatial components, leading to improved source localization. The accuracy of MEG and OPM-MEG source localization relies on data preprocessing techniques to isolate the neuronal fields from other magnetic and biomagnetic sources through signal space separation, rejection, and suppression methods. Current preprocessing methods risk rejecting brain signals of interest, or can spread sensor noise artifacts unknowingly. Here we propose a novel preprocessing method for MEG, and test the extent to which it overcomes limitations of prior methods. Specifically, we derive, apply, and assess a novel signal space separation (SSS) method with Fosters inverse, a weighted matrix inversion protocol that can utilize information about the MEG sensor noise and artifacts to reconstruct neuronal activity. With simulations, phantom head cryogenic MEG recordings, and subject recordings with two OPM-MEG systems, we show that Fosters inverse with SSS offers a more robust and stable reconstruction of the neuronal magnetic fields, especially in the face of sensor noise and artifacts. As the field of cognitive neuroscience continues to embrace MEG and OPM-MEG, Fosters inverse with SSS offers a robust and powerful data preprocessing technique for reducing noise and improving source localization of the underlying neuronal currents.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Two disparity channels in human visual cortex with different contrast and blur sensitivity

PurposeOur goal is to describe the contrast and blur sensitivity of multiple horizontal disparity sub-systems and to relate them to the contrast and spatial sensitivities of their monocular inputs. MethodsSteady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEPs) amplitudes were recorded in response to Dynamic Random Dot Stereograms (DRDS) alternating at 2 Hz between zero disparity and varying magnitudes of crossed disparity for disparity plane and disparity grating stimuli. Half-image contrasts ranged between 2.5 and 80% and over a range of Gaussian blurs from 1.4 to 12 arcmin. Separate experiments measured contrast and blur sensitivity for the monocular half-images. ResultsThe first and second harmonics disparity responses were maximal for disparity gratings and for the disparity plane condition, respectively. The first harmonic of the disparity grating response was more affected by both contrast and blur than was the second harmonic of the disparity plane response which had higher contrast sensitivity than the first harmonic. ConclusionThe corrugation frequency, contrast and blur tuning of the first harmonic suggest that it reflects activity of neurons tuned to higher luminance spatial frequencies that are selective for relative disparity, whereas the second harmonic reflects the activity of neurons sensitive to absolute disparity that are driven by low monocular spatial spatial frequencies. Translational RelevanceSSVEPs to DRDS provide two objective neural measures of disparity processing, the first harmonic - whose stimulus preferences are similar to those of behavioral stereoacuity - and the second harmonic that represents an independent disparity-specific, but not necessarily stereoscopic mechanism.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Cognitive penetrability of scene representations based on horizontal image disparities

The structure of natural scenes is signaled by many visual cues. Principal amongst them are the binocular disparities created by the laterally separated viewpoints of the two eyes. Disparity cues are believed to be processed hierarchically, first in terms of local measurements of absolute disparity and second in terms of more global measurements of relative disparity that allow extraction of the depth structure of a scene. Psychophysical and oculomotor studies have suggested that relative disparities are particularly relevant to perception, whilst absolute disparities are not. Here, we compare neural responses to stimuli that isolate the absolute disparity cue with stimuli that contain additional relative disparity cues, using the high temporal resolution of EEG to determine the temporal order of absolute and relative disparity processing. By varying the observers task, we assess the extent to which each cue is cognitively penetrable. We find that absolute disparity is extracted before relative disparity, and that task effects arise only at or after the extraction of relative disparity. Our results indicate a hierarchy of disparity processing stages leading to the formation of a proto-object representation upon which higher cognitive processes can act.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Dynamics of absolute and relative disparity processing in human visual cortex

Cortical processing of binocular disparity is believed to begin in V1 where cells are sensitive to absolute disparity, followed by the extraction of relative disparity in higher visual areas. While much is known about the cortical distribution and spatial tuning of disparity-selective neurons, the relationship between their spatial and temporal properties is less well understood. Here, we use steady-state Visual Evoked Potentials and dynamic random dot stereograms to characterize the temporal dynamics of spatial mechanisms in human visual cortex that are primarily sensitive to either absolute or relative disparity. Stereograms alternated between disparate and non-disparate states at 2 Hz. By varying the spatial frequency content of the disparate fields from a planar surface to corrugated ones, we biased responses towards absolute vs. relative disparities. Reliable Components Analysis was used to derive two dominant sources from the 128 channel EEG records. The first component (RC1) was maximal over the occipital pole while the second component (RC2) was maximal over right lateral occipital electrodes. In RC1, first harmonic responses were sustained, tuned for corrugation frequency, and sensitive to the presence of disparity references, consistent with prior psychophysical sensitivity measurements. By contrast, the second harmonic, associated with transient processing, was not spatially tuned and was indifferent to references, consistent with it being generated by an absolute disparity mechanism. In RC2, the sustained response component showed similar tuning and sensitivity to references. However, sensitivity for absolute disparity dropped off, and transient signals were mainly driven by the lowest corrugation frequencies. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTSustained and transient mechanisms have been demonstrated across sensory systems and may reflect a common coding strategy. This strategy may be useful for the analysis of the form and duration of complex events in the case of sustained signals, and the onset and location of events in the case of transient signals. Here, we provide direct neural correlates of sustained and transient disparity mechanisms in human visual cortex. Early visual cortex is sensitive to both relative and absolute disparity, with the former being processed in a sustained fashion and the latter in a more transient fashion. Outside of early visual cortex, sustained relative disparity responses are readily measurable, but transient responses and responses to absolute disparity are not.

neuroscience↗