bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Joo, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Joo, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

CRFalign: A Sequence-structure alignment of proteins based on a combinationof HMM-HMM comparison and conditional random fields

We built a method of sequence-structure alignment (called CRFalign) which improves upon a base alignment model based on HMM-HMM comparison by employing pairwise conditional random fields (pCRF) in combination with nonlinear scoring functions of structural and sequence features. The total scoring function consists of a base scoring part based on HMM-HMM profile comparison plus additional nonlinear scoring part which is implemented by a set of gradient boosted regression trees. In addition to sequence profile features, various structural features are employed including secondary structures, solvent accessibilities, environment-dependent properties that give rise to position-dependent as well as environment-dependent match scores and gap penalties. Training is performed on reference alignments at superfamily levels or twilight zone chosen from the SABmark benchmark set. We found that our alignment method produce relative improvement in terms of average alignment accuracies, especially for the alignment of remote homologous proteins. We found that our alignment method produced (by using Modeller) better modeling results especially in the relatively hard targets compared with other methods. CRFalign was successfully applied to the stages of fold recognition and multiple sequence alignment in CASP11 and CASP12 competition on protein structure predictions.

bioinformatics↗

Methods For Estimation Of Model Accuracy In CASP12

Methods for reliably estimating the quality of 3D models of proteins are essential drivers for the wide adoption and serious acceptance of protein structure predictions by life scientists. In this paper, the most successful groups in CASP12 describe their latest methods for Estimates of Model Accuracy (EMA). We show that pure single model accuracy estimation methods has shown clear progress since CASP11; the three top methods (MESHI, ProQ3, SVMQA) all perform better than the top method of CASP11 (ProQ2). The pure single model accuracy estimation methods outperform quasi-single (ModFOLD6 variations) and consensus methods (Pcons, ModFOLDclust2, Pcomb-domain and Wallner) in model selection, but are still not as good as those methods in absolute model quality estimation and predictions of local quality. Finally, we show that when using contact based model quality measures (CAD, 1DDT) the single model quality methods perform relatively better.

bioinformatics↗