bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Jergic, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Jergic, S..

14 recordsLinked to original sources

Structural basis of the nucleotide incorporation cycle of bacterial DNA polymerase III

Bacterial DNA polymerase III (PolIII) is the primary replicative polymerase responsible for faithful genome duplication, yet high-resolution structural snapshots of the enzyme during DNA synthesis and proofreading have remained elusive. Here we determine cryo-EM structures of the Escherichia coli PolIII core-clamp-DNA binary, ternary and proofreading complexes at 2.4-2.7 [A] resolution, revealing the structural basis of nucleotide selection, incorporation and proofreading. Binding of an incoming nucleotide expels the single-stranded template overhang from the polymerase central channel and induces a large rotation of the polymerase index finger, which closes around the incoming nucleotide to form a compact nascent base-pair-binding pocket. A conserved tyrosine on the finger stacks against the incoming nucleotide to impose stringent steric constraints that promote nucleotide selection, whereas a conserved histidine acts as a steric gate to exclude ribonucleotides. The proofreading structures capture key intermediates that reveal how PolIII transfers a mismatched primer terminus to the 3'-5' exonuclease active site and excises the misincorporated nucleotide while avoiding unnecessary degradation of correctly paired DNA. Together, these findings define the molecular mechanism by which the bacterial replicative polymerase couples rapid and processive DNA synthesis with exceptional replication fidelity.

biochemistry↗

A bipartite interaction with the processivity clamp potentiates Pol IV-mediated TLS

Processivity clamps mediate polymerase switching for translesion synthesis (TLS). All three E. coli TLS polymerases interact with the {beta}2 processivity clamp through a conserved clamp-binding motif (CBM), which is indispensable for TLS. Notably, Pol IV also makes a unique secondary contact with the clamp through non-CBM residues. However, the role of this "rim contact" in Pol IV-mediated TLS remains poorly understood. Here we show that the rim contact is critical for TLS past strong replication blocks. In in vitro reconstituted Pol IV-mediated TLS, ablating the rim contact compromises TLS past 3-methyl dA, a strong block, while barely affecting TLS past N2-furfuryl dG, a weak block. Similar observations are also made in E. coli cells bearing a single copy of these lesions in the genome. Within lesion-stalled replication forks, the rim interaction and ssDNA binding protein cooperatively poise Pol IV to better compete with Pol III for binding to a cleft through its CBM. We propose that this bipartite clamp interaction enables Pol IV to rapidly resolve lesion-stalled replication through TLS at the fork, which reduces damage induced mutagenesis.

biochemistry↗

Single-molecule visualization of sequence-specific RNA binding by a designer PPR protein

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are a large family of modular RNA-binding proteins that recognize specific ssRNA target sequences. There is significant interest in developing designer PPRs for use in diagnostics or as tools to detect and localize target RNA sequences. However, it is unclear how PPRs search for target sequences within complex transcriptomes and current models to predict PPR binding sites struggle to reconcile the effects that RNA mismatches and secondary structure have on PPR binding. To address this, we determined the structure of a designer PPR (dPPR10) bound to its target sequence and used two- and three-colour single-molecule FRET to interrogate the mechanism of ssRNA binding to individual PPR proteins in real time. We demonstrate that longer RNA sequences were significantly slower to bind (or could not bind at all) and that this is, in part, due to their propensity to form stable secondary structures that sequester the target sequence from dPPR10. Importantly, dPPR10 does not associate with non-target flanking sequences, binding specifically to its target sequence within longer ssRNA species. This data provides evidence that PPRs have limited to no capacity to scan RNA transcripts for target sequences and instead rely on diffusion for cognate searching. The kinetic constraints imposed by random three-dimensional diffusion may explain the long-standing conundrum of why PPR proteins are abundant in organelles, but almost unknown outside them (i.e. in the cytosol and nucleus). These findings will inform improved prediction of PPR binding sites for the development of designer PPRs. SummaryPentatricopeptide repeat proteins (PPR) are a large family of modular RNA-binding proteins, whereby each module can be designed to bind to a specific ssRNA nucleobase and thus any RNA sequence of interest. As such, there is substantial interest in developing designer PPRs for a range of biotechnology applications, including diagnostics or in vivo localisation of RNA species; however, the mechanistic details regarding how PPRs search for and bind to target sequences is unclear. As such, we combined structure-based and single- molecule approaches and determined that PPRs bind only to their target sequences (i.e., they do not associate with non-target RNA sequences) and do not scan longer RNA oligonucleotides for the target sequence. Instead, target searching appears kinetically-constrained by random three-dimensional diffusion, providing an explanation as to why PPRs are found almost exclusively in organelle compartments that typically have smaller transcriptomes. Collectively, this work identifies several key considerations for future designer PPR developments.

biochemistry↗

Structural characterisation of the complete cycle of sliding clamp loading in Escherichia coli

Ring-shaped DNA sliding clamps are essential for DNA replication and genome maintenance. Clamps need to be opened or trapped open and chaperoned onto DNA by clamp loader complexes (CLCs). Detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which CLCs open and place clamps around DNA remains limited. Here, we present a series of six structures of the Escherichia coli CLC bound to an open or closed clamp on and off a primer-template DNA that represent all intermediates in the clamp loading process. We show that the ATP-bound CLC first binds to a clamp, then constricts to hold onto it. The CLC then expands to open the clamp with a gap large enough for double-stranded DNA to enter. Upon binding to DNA, the CLC constricts slightly, allowing ATP hydrolysis and clamp closing around DNA. Although both yeast and E. coli CLCs open clamps by crab claw-like motions, they do it by the CLC expanding in opposite directions. These structures provide critical high-resolution snapshots of clamp loading by the E. coli CLC, revealing how the molecular machine works.

biochemistry↗

Single-molecule visualization of stalled replication-fork rescue by the Escherichia coli Rep helicase

Genome duplication occurs while the template DNA is bound by numerous DNA-binding proteins. Each of these proteins act as potential roadblocks to the replication fork and can have deleterious effects on cells. In Escherichia coli, these roadblocks are displaced by the accessory helicase Rep, a DNA translocase and helicase that interacts with the replisome. The mechanistic details underlying the coordination with replication and roadblock removal by Rep remain poorly understood. Through real-time fluorescence imaging of the DNA produced by individual E. coli replisomes and the simultaneous visualization of fluorescently-labeled Rep, we show that Rep continually surveils elongating replisomes. We found that this association of Rep with the replisome is stochastic and occurs independently of whether the fork is stalled or not. Further, we visualize the efficient rescue of stalled replication forks by directly imaging individual Rep molecules as they remove a model protein roadblock, dCas9, from the template DNA. Using roadblocks of varying DNA-binding stabilities, we conclude that replication restart is the rate-limiting step of stalled replication rescue.

biochemistry↗

The E. coli helicase does not use ATP during replication.

The replisome is responsible for replication of DNA in all domains of life, with several of its individual enzyme components relying on hydrolysis of nucleoside triphosphates to provide energy for replisome function. Half a century of biochemical studies have demonstrated a dependence on ATP as an energy source for helicases to unwind duplex DNA during replication. Through single-molecule visualization of DNA replication by the Escherichia coli replisome, we demonstrate that the DnaB helicase does not rely on hydrolysis of ATP (or any ribo-NTPs) in the context of the elongating replisome. We establish that nucleotide incorporation by the leading-strand polymerase is the main motor driving the replication process. One Sentence SummaryPolymerases provide the energy for helicase-mediated DNA unwinding during E. coli DNA replication.

biochemistry↗

Mechanism of transcription modulation by the transcription-repair coupling factor

Elongation by RNA polymerase is dynamically modulated by accessory factors. The transcription-repair coupling factor (TRCF) recognizes distressed RNAPs and either rescues transcription or initiates transcription termination. Precisely how TRCFs choose to execute either outcome remains unclear. With Escherichia coli as a model, we used single-molecule assays to study dynamic modulation of elongation by Mfd, the bacterial TRCF. We found that nucleotide-bound Mfd converts the elongation complex (EC) into a catalytically poised state, presenting the EC with an opportunity to restart transcription. After long-lived residence in this catalytically poised state, ATP hydrolysis by Mfd remodels the EC through an irreversible process leading to loss of the RNA transcript. Further, biophysical studies revealed that the motor domain of Mfd binds and partially melts DNA containing a template strand overhang. The results explain pathway choice determining the fate of the EC and provide a molecular mechanism for transcription modulation by TRCF.

biophysics↗

A biophysical and structural analysis of DNA binding by oligomeric hSSB1 (NABP2/OBFC2B)

The oxidative modification of DNA can result in the loss of genome integrity and must be repaired to maintain overall genomic stability. We have recently demonstrated that human single stranded DNA binding protein 1 (hSSB1/NABP2/OBFC2B) plays a crucial role in the removal of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro- guanine (8-oxoG), the most common form of oxidative DNA damage. The ability of hSSB1 to form disulphide-bonded tetramers and higher oligomers in an oxidative environment is critical for this process. In this study, we have used nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) experiments to determine the molecular details of ssDNA binding by oligomeric hSSB1. We reveal that hSSB1 oligomers interact with single DNA strands containing damaged DNA bases; however, our data also show that oxidised bases are recognised in the same manner as undamaged DNA bases. We further demonstrate that oxidised hSSB1 interacts with ssDNA with a significantly higher affinity than its monomeric form confirming that oligomeric proteins such as tetramers can bind directly to ssDNA. NMR experiments provide evidence that oligomeric hSSB1 is able to bind longer ssDNA in both binding polarities using a distinct set of residues different to those of the related SSB from Escherichia coli.

biochemistry↗

A gatekeeping function of the replicative polymerase controls pathway choice in the resolution of lesion-stalled replisomes

DNA lesions stall the replisome and proper resolution of these obstructions is critical for genome stability. Replisomes can directly replicate past a lesion by error-prone translesion synthesis. Alternatively, replisomes can reprime DNA synthesis downstream of the lesion, creating a single-stranded DNA gap that is repaired primarily in an error-free, homology-directed manner. Here we demonstrate how structural changes within the bacterial replisome determine the resolution pathway of lesion-stalled replisomes. This pathway selection is controlled by a dynamic interaction between the proofreading subunit of the replicative polymerase and the processivity clamp, which sets a kinetic barrier to restrict access of TLS polymerases to the primer/template junction. Failure of TLS polymerases to overcome this barrier leads to repriming, which competes kinetically with TLS. Our results demonstrate that independent of its exonuclease activity, the proofreading subunit of the replisome acts as a gatekeeper and influences replication fidelity during the resolution of lesion-stalled replisomes.

biochemistry↗

UmuD and RecA* modulate the DNA-binding activity of DNA polymerase IV in Escherichia coli

DNA polymerase IV (pol IV) is expressed at increased levels in Escherichia coli cells suffering high levels of DNA damage. In a recent single-molecule imaging study, we demonstrated that elevating the pol IV concentration is not sufficient to provide access to binding sites on the nucleoid, suggesting that other factors may recruit pol IV to its substrates once the DNA becomes damaged. Here we extend this work, investigating the proteins UmuD and RecA as potential modulators of pol IV activity. UmuD promotes long-lived association of pol IV with the nucleoid, whereas its cleaved form, UmuD, which accumulates in DNA-damaged cells, inhibits binding. In agreement with proposed roles for pol IV in homologous recombination, up to 40% of pol IV foci colocalise with a probe for RecA* nucleoprotein filaments in ciprofloxacin-treated cells. A hyperactive RecA mutant, recA(E38K), allows pol IV to bind the nucleoid even in the absence of exogenous DNA damage. In vitro, RecA(E38K) forms RecA*-like structures that can recruit pol IV, even on double-stranded DNA, consistent with a physical interaction between RecA and pol IV. Together, the results indicate that UmuD and RecA modulate the binding of pol IV to its DNA substrates, which frequently coincide with RecA* structures.

microbiology↗

Recycling of single-stranded DNA-binding protein by the bacterial replisome.

Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) support DNA replication by protecting single-stranded DNA from nucleolytic attack, preventing intra-strand pairing events, and playing many other regulatory roles within the replisome. Recent developments in single-molecule approaches have led to a revised picture of the replisome that is much more complex in how it retains or recycles protein components. Here we visualise how an in vitro reconstituted E. coli replisome recruits SSB by relying on two different molecular mechanisms. Not only does it recruit new SSB molecules from solution to coat newly formed single-stranded DNA on the lagging strand, but it also internally recycles SSB from one Okazaki fragment to the next. We show that this internal transfer mechanism is balanced against recruitment from solution in a manner that is concentration dependent. By visualising SSB dynamics in live cells, we show that both internal transfer and external exchange mechanisms are physiologically relevant.

biophysics↗

A Primase-Induced Conformational Switch Controls the Stability of the Bacterial Replisome

Recent studies of bacterial DNA replication have led to a picture of the replisome as an entity that freely exchanges DNA polymerases and displays intermittent coupling between the helicase and polymerase(s). Challenging the textbook model of the polymerase holoenzyme acting as a stable complex coordinating the replisome, these observations suggest a role of the helicase as the central organizing hub. We show here that the molecular origin of this newly-found plasticity lies in the >400-fold increase in strength of the interaction between the polymerase holoenzyme and the replicative helicase upon association of the primase with the replisome. By combining in vitro ensemble-averaged and single-molecule assays, we demonstrate that this conformational switch operates during replication and promotes recruitment of multiple holoenzymes at the fork. Our observations provide a molecular mechanism for polymerase exchange and offer a revised model for the replication reaction that emphasizes its stochasticity.

biochemistry↗

Nuclease dead Cas9 is a programmable roadblock for DNA replication

DNA replication occurs on chromosomal DNA while processes such as DNA repair, recombination and transcription continue. However, we have limited experimental tools to study the consequences of collisions between DNA-bound molecular machines. Here, we repurpose a catalytically inactivated Cas9 (dCas9) construct fused to the photo-stable dL5 protein fluoromodule as a novel, targetable protein-DNA roadblock for studying replication fork arrest at the single-molecule level in vitro as well as in vivo. We find that the specifically bound dCas9-guideRNA complex arrests viral, bacterial and eukaryotic replication forks in vitro.

biochemistry↗

Spatial and temporal organization of RecA in the Escherichia coli DNA-damage response

The RecA protein orchestrates the cellular response to DNA damage via its multiple roles in the bacterial SOS response. Lack of tools that provide unambiguous access to the various RecA states within the cell have prevented understanding of the spatial and temporal changes in RecA structure/function that underlie control of the damage response. Here, we develop a monomeric C-terminal fragment of the {lambda} repressor as a novel fluorescent probe that specifically interacts with RecA filaments on single-stranded DNA (RecA*). Single-molecule imaging techniques in live cells demonstrate that RecA is largely sequestered in storage structures during normal metabolism. Upon DNA damage, the storage structures dissolve and the cytosolic pool of RecA rapidly nucleates to form early SOS-signaling complexes, maturing into DNA-bound RecA bundles at later time points. Both before and after SOS induction, RecA* largely appears at locations distal from replisomes. Upon completion of repair, RecA storage structures reform.

biophysics↗