Biology subjects

Iyer, D. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Iyer, D. R..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Disruption of Microhomology-mediated End-joining in Ewing Sarcoma

Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is a group of bone and soft tissue cancers in children and young adults. Since EwS cells have pronounced sensitivity to radiation and chemotherapy-induced DNA damage, the role of the oncoprotein, EWS-FLI1, in DNA repair is likely. Here, we demonstrate that EWS-FLI1 causes a defect in microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) repair. EWSR1 is a splicing factor that promotes the faithful splicing of the POLQ pre-mRNA, required for the expression of POL{Theta}, a critical protein in the MMEJ pathway. Expression of EWS-FLI1, or loss of EWSR1, causes exon 25 skipping of the POLQ transcript, decreased POL{Theta} expression, impaired MMEJ, and cellular sensitivity to inhibitors of the Fanconi Anemia (FA), NHEJ, or HR pathways, through the mechanism of synthetic lethality. Knockdown of EWS-FLI1 expression restores POL0 mitotic foci and increases MMEJ activity. Inhibitors of the FA, NHEJ, or HR therefore may provide a targeted therapy for patients with EwS. Highlights- Ewing sarcoma tumors have a deficiency in POL{theta} expression and a corresponding loss of MMEJ activity - EWSR1 is a splicing factor that interacts with other splicing factors such as FUBP1 and KHSRP/FUBP2 to accurately splice the POLQ mRNA. - The EWS-FLI1 fusion oncoprotein, or loss of EWSR1, causes a splicing defect, leading to exon25 skipping of the POLQ pre-mRNA and loss of POL{theta} expression - The MMEJ deficiency of EwS cells results in cellular sensitivity to inhibitors of Fanconi Anemia, Homologous Recombination or Non-Homologous End-Joining - Exon 25 skipping of POLQ mRNA is a predictive biomarker for HR inhibitors in human cancers

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Molecular origins of genome instability following a single chromosome mis-segregation event

Chromosome instability (CIN) is the most common form of genome instability and is a hallmark of cancer. CIN invariably leads to aneuploidy, a state of karyotype imbalance. Here, we show that aneuploidy can also trigger CIN. We found that aneuploid cells experience DNA replication stress in their first S-phase and precipitate in a state of continuous CIN. This generates a repertoire of genetically diverse cells that can either continue proliferating or stop dividing. Cycling aneuploid cells display lower karyotype complexity compared to the arrested ones and increased expression of DNA repair signatures. Interestingly, the same signatures were upregulated in highly-proliferative cancer cells, which might enable them to proliferate despite the disadvantage conferred by aneuploidy-induced CIN. Altogether, our study reveals the short-term origins of CIN following aneuploidy and indicates the aneuploid state of cancer cells as a point mutation-independent source of genome instability, providing an explanation for aneuploidy occurrence in tumors.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2020

The chromatin-binding domain of Ki-67 together with p53 protects human chromosomes from mitotic damage

Vertebrate mammals express a protein called Ki-67 which is most widely known as a clinically useful marker of highly proliferative cells. Previous studies of human cells indicated that acute depletion of Ki-67 can elicit a delay at the G1/S boundary of the cell cycle, dependent on induction of the checkpoint protein p21. Consistent with those observations, we show here that acute Ki-67 depletion causes hallmarks of DNA damage, and the damage occurs even in the absence of checkpoint signaling. This damage is not observed in cells traversing S phase but is instead robustly detected in mitotic cells. The C-terminal chromatin binding domain of Ki-67 is necessary and sufficient to protect cells from this damage. We also observe synergistic effects when Ki-67 and p53 are simultaneously depleted, resulting in increased levels of chromosome bridges at anaphase, followed by the appearance of micronuclei. Therefore, these studies identify the C-terminus of Ki-67 as an important module for genome stability.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Replication Fork Slowing And Stalling are Distinct, Checkpoint-Independent Consequences of Replicating Damaged DNA

In response to DNA damage during S phase, cells slow DNA replication. This slowing is orchestrated by the intra-S checkpoint and involves inhibition of origin firing and reduction of replication fork speed. Slowing of replication allows for tolerance of DNA damage and suppresses genomic instability. Although the mechanisms of origin inhibition by the intra-S checkpoint are understood, major questions remain about how the checkpoint regulates replication forks: Does the checkpoint regulate the rate of fork progression? Does the checkpoint affect all forks, or only those encountering damage? Does the checkpoint facilitate the replication of polymerase-blocking lesions? To address these questions, we have analyzed the checkpoint in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe using a single-molecule DNA combing assay, which allows us to unambiguously separate the contribution of origin and fork regulation towards replication slowing, and allows us to investigate the behavior of individual forks. Moreover, we have interrogated the role of forks interacting with individual sites of damage by using three damaging agents--MMS, 4NQO and bleomycin--that cause similar levels of replication slowing with very different frequency of DNA lesions. We find that the checkpoint slows replication by inhibiting origin firing, but not by decreasing fork rates. However, the checkpoint appears to facilitate replication of damaged templates, allowing forks to more quickly pass lesions. Finally, using a novel analytic approach, we rigorously identify fork stalling events in our combing data and show that they play a previously unappreciated role in shaping replication kinetics in response to DNA damage.\n\nAuthor SummaryFaithful duplication of the genome is essential for genetic stability of organisms and species. To ensure faithful duplication, cells must be able to replicate damaged DNA. To do so, they employ checkpoints that regulate replication in response to DNA damage. However, the mechanisms by which checkpoints regulate DNA replication forks, the macromolecular machines that contain the helicases and polymerases required to unwind and copy the parental DNA, is unknown. We have used DNA combing, a single-molecule technique that allows us to monitor the progression of individual replication forks, to characterize the response of fission yeast replication forks to DNA damage that blocks the replicative polymerases. We find that forks pass most lesions with only a brief pause and that this lesion bypass is checkpoint independent. However, at a low frequency, forks stall at lesions, and that the checkpoint is required to prevent these stalls from accumulating single-stranded DNA. Our results suggest that the major role of the checkpoint is not to regulate the interaction of replication forks with DNA damage, per se, but to mitigate the consequences of fork stalling when forks are unable to successfully navigate DNA damage on their own.

cell biology↗