Biology subjects

Inouye, B. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Inouye, B. D..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Herbarium specimens reliably track plant phenological responses to climate change in understudied montane biomes

Long-term field observations typically are the "gold-standard" for inferences of phenological sensitivities in montane systems but are spatially limited. Herbarium specimens provide broader spatial coverage, but their utility to accurately capture montane phenology remains poorly known. We compared flowering phenology of 45 species inferred from herbarium specimens with comparable data from nearly 50 years of direct observations at the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory. Estimates of flowering time and phenological sensitivity to snow density were consistent between herbarium specimens and observations, but observations revealed secondary flowering peaks. Herbarium specimens additionally yielded shallower estimates of phenological sensitivity to spring temperature than did field observations. Across co-occurring species, "early" flowering individuals inferred from herbarium specimens, rather than the mean response across all individuals, may better approximate community-level phenological responses to temperature changes. We conclude that herbarium specimens are reliable resources for closing gaps in understanding phenological variation along elevational gradients of montane systems.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

Global test of the enemy release hypothesis reveals similar patterns of herbivory across native and non-native plants

The Enemy Release Hypothesis (ERH) proposes that non-native plants escape their co-evolved herbivores and benefit from reduced herbivory in their introduced ranges. Numerous studies have tested this hypothesis, with conflicting results, but previous studies focus on average levels of herbivory and overlook the substantial within-population variability in herbivory, which may provide unique insights into the ERH. We tested differences in mean herbivory and added a novel approach to the ERH by comparing within-population variability in herbivory between native and non-native plant populations. We include several covariates that might mask an effect of enemy release, including latitude, regional plant richness, plant growth form and plant cover. We use leaf herbivory data collected by the Herbivory Variability Network for 788 plant populations (616 native range populations and 172 introduced range populations) of 503 different native and non-native species distributed worldwide. We found no overall differences in mean herbivory or herbivory variability between native and non-native plant populations. Taken together, our results indicate no evidence of enemy release for non-native plants, suggesting that enemy release is not a generalized mechanism favoring the success of non-native species. OPEN RESEARCH STATEMENTData published and available for peer review at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.44j0zpckm

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

Skewness in bee and flower phenological distributions

Phenological distributions are characterized by their central tendency, breadth, and shape, and all three determine the extent to which interacting species overlap in time. Pollination mutualisms rely on temporal co-occurrence of pollinators and their floral resources, and while much work has been done to characterize the shapes of flower phenological distributions, similar studies including pollinators are lacking. Here, we provide the first broad assessment of skewness, a component of distribution shape, for a bee community. We compare skewness in bees to that in flowers, related bee and flower skewness to other properties of their phenology, and quantify the potential consequences of differences in skewness between bees and flowers. Both bee and flower phenologies tend to be right-skewed, with a more exaggerated asymmetry in bees. Early-season species tend to be the most skewed, and this relationship is also stronger in bees than in flowers. Based on a simulation experiment, differences in bee and flower skewness could account for up to 14% of pair-wise overlap differences. Given the potential for interaction loss, we argue that difference in skewness of interacting species is an under-appreciated property of phenological change.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2021

Disorder or a new order: how climate change affects phenological variability

Advancing spring phenology is a well-documented consequence of anthropogenic climate change, but it is not well understood how climate change will affect the variability of phenology year-to-year. Species phenological timings reflect adaptation to a broad suite of abiotic needs (e.g. thermal energy) and biotic interactions (e.g. predation and pollination), and changes in patterns of variability may disrupt those adaptations and interactions. Here, we present a geographically and taxonomically broad analysis of phenological shifts, temperature sensitivity, and changes in inter-annual variance encompassing nearly 10,000 long-term phenology time-series representing over 1,000 species across much of the northern hemisphere. We show that early-season species in colder and less seasonal regions were the most sensitive to temperature change and had the least variable phenologies. The timings of leaf-out, flowering, insect first-occurrence, and bird arrival have all shifted earlier and tend to be less variable in warmer years. This has led leaf-out and flower phenology to become moderately but significantly less variable over time. These simultaneous changes in phenological averages and the variation around them have the potential to influence mismatches among interacting species that are difficult to anticipate if shifts in average are studied in isolation.

ecology↗