bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Inglese, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Inglese, P..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Mass recalibration for desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging using endogenous reference ions.

1BackgroundMass spectrometry imaging (MSI) data often consist of tens of thousands of mass spectra collected from a sample surface. During the time necessary to perform a single acquisition, it is likely that uncontrollable factors alter the validity of the initial mass calibration of the instrument, resulting in mass errors of magnitude significantly larger than their expected values. This phenomenon has a two-fold detrimental effect: a) it reduces the ability to interpret the results based on the observed signals, b) it can affect the quality of the observed signal spatial distributions. ResultsWe present a post-acquisition computational method capable of reducing the observed mass drift by up to 60 ppm in biological samples, exploiting the presence of typical molecules with a known mass-to-charge ratio. The procedure, tested on time-of-flight (TOF) and Orbitrap mass spectrometry analyzers interfaced to a desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) source, improves the molecular annotation quality and the spatial distributions of the detected ions. ConclusionThe presented method represents a robust and accurate tool for performing post-acquisition mass recalibration of DESI-MSI datasets and can help to increase the reliability of the molecular assignment and the data quality.

bioinformatics↗

Co-localization features for classification of tumors using mass spectrometry imaging

Statistical modeling of mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) data is a crucial component for the understanding of the molecular characteristics of cancerous tissues. Quantification of the abundances of metabolites or batch effect between multiple spectral acquisitions represents only a few of the challenges associated with this type of data analysis. Here we introduce a method based on ion co-localization features that allows the classification of whole tissue specimens using MSI data, which overcomes the possible batch effect issues and generates data-driven hypotheses on the underlying mechanisms associated with the different classes of analyzed samples.

bioinformatics↗

Network analysis of mass spectrometry imaging data from colorectal cancer identifies key metabolites common to metastatic development.

A deeper understanding of inter-tumor and intra-tumor heterogeneity is a critical factor for the advancement of next generation strategies against cancer. The heterogeneous morphology exhibited by solid tumors is mirrored by their metabolic heterogeneity. Defining the basic biological mechanisms that underlie tumor cell variability will be fundamental to the development of personalized cancer treatments. Variability in the molecular signatures found in local regions of cancer tissues can be captured through an untargeted analysis of their metabolic constituents. Here we demonstrate that DESI mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) combined with network analysis can provide detailed insight into the metabolic heterogeneity of colorectal cancer (CRC). We show that network modules capture signatures which differentiate tumor metabolism in the core and in the surrounding region. Moreover, module preservation analysis of network modules between patients with and without metastatic recurrence explains the inter-subject metabolic differences associated with diverse clinical outcomes such as metastatic recurrence.\n\nSignificanceNetwork analysis of DESI-MSI data from CRC human tissue reveals clinically relevant co-expression ion patterns associated with metastatic susceptibility. This delineates a more complex picture of tumor heterogeneity than conventional hard segmentation algorithms. Using tissue sections from central regions and at a distance from the tumor center, ion co-expression patterns reveal common features among patients who developed metastases (up of > 5 years) not preserved in patients who did not develop metastases. This offers insight into the nature of the complex molecular interactions associated with cancer recurrence. Presently, predicting CRC relapse is challenging, and histopathologically like-for-like cancers frequently manifest widely varying metastatic tendencies. Thus, the methodology introduced here more robustly defines the risk of metastases based on tumor biochemical heterogeneity.\n\nAuthor contributionsP.I., Z.T., R.C.G.: designed the study, developed the workflow, analyzed the data, interpreted the results, wrote the paper; N.S. collected the MS, performed the H...E staining, wrote the paper; L.D.: interpreted the results, wrote the paper; A.M.: collected the MS; A.S.: histological assessment; L.P.: collected the tissue specimens and clinical metadata; A.D.: collected the MS; H.K.: performed the H...E staining; R.M.: collected the tissue specimens and clinical metadata. R.G.: histological assessment; J.K.N: designed the study, edited the paper.

cancer biology↗