bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Idowu, M. O.

Publications and source records attributed to Idowu, M. O..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Effective anti-tumor immune response against HCC is orchestrated by immune cell partnership network that functions through hepatic homeostatic pathways, not direct cytotoxicity

BackgroundMetabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) can progress to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet the immune mechanisms driving this transition remain unclear. MethodsIn a chronic Western diet (WD) mouse model, we performed single-nuclei RNA sequencing to track MAFLD progression into HCC and subsequent tumor inhibition upon dietary correction. ResultsCarcinogenesis begins during MAFLD, with tumor cells entering dormancy when HCC is mitigated. Rather than purely tolerogenic, the liver actively engages immune responses targeting myofibroblasts, fibroblasts and hepatocytes to maintain tissue homeostasis. Cytotoxic cells contribute to turnover of liver cells but do not primarily target the tumor. NKT cells predominate under chronic WD, while monocytes join them in HCC progression on a WD. Upon dietary correction, monocyte-driven immunity confers protection against HCC through targeting tissue homeostatic pathways and antioxidant mechanisms. Crucially, liver tissue response--not merely immune activation--dictates whether tumors grow or regress, emphasizing the importance of restoring liver tissue integrity. Also, protection against HCC is linked to a distinct immunological pattern, differing from healthy controls, underscoring the need for immune reprogramming. ConclusionThese findings reveal the dual roles of similar pathways, where immune patterns targeting different cells shape distinct outcomes. Restoring tissue homeostasis and regeneration creates a tumor-hostile microenvironment, whereas tumor-directed approaches fail to remodel the TME. This underscores the need for tissue remodeling strategies in cancer prevention and treatment. Lay summaryOur study challenges the traditional view that the liver is purely tolerant to immune responses, revealing that it actively regulates immunity to maintain tissue health. We found that liver cancer (HCC) begins during fatty liver disease (MAFLD) but can be halted if immune cells--especially monocytes--restore tissue integrity. Instead of focusing solely on killing tumors, effective immunotherapy should harness the bodys natural ability to repair the liver, creating an environment where cancer cannot thrive. This discovery paves the way for innovative treatments that promote immune-driven tissue regeneration as a strategy for cancer prevention and therapy.

immunology↗

Exploitation of sulfated glycosaminoglycan status for precision medicine of platinums in triple-negative breast cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer lacking targetable biomarkers. TNBC is known to be most aggressive, and when metastatic is often drug resistant and uncurable. Biomarkers predicting response to therapy improve treatment decisions and allow personalized approaches for TNBC patients. This study explores sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) levels as a predictor of TNBC response to platinum therapy. sGAG levels were quantified in three distinct TNBC tumor models including cell line-derived, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors, and isogenic models deficient in sGAG biosynthesis. The in vivo antitumor efficacy of Triplatin, a sGAG-directed platinum agent, was compared in these models to the clinical platinum agent, carboplatin. We determined that >40% of TNBC PDX tissue microarray samples have high levels of sGAGs. The in vivo accumulation of Triplatin in tumors as well as antitumor efficacy of Triplatin positively correlated with sGAG levels on tumor cells, whereas carboplatin followed the opposite trend. In carboplatin-resistant tumor models expressing high levels of sGAGs, Triplatin decreased primary tumor growth, reduced lung metastases and inhibited metastatic growth in lungs, liver, and ovaries. sGAG levels served as a predictor of Triplatin sensitivity in TNBC. Triplatin may be particularly beneficial in treating patients with chemotherapy-resistant tumors who have evidence of residual disease after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. More effective neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment will likely improve clinical outcome of TNBC. SignificanceTNBC is a heterogenous disease, often defined by the absence of a therapeutic target. Our recent results show sGAGs may provide a viable biomarker for Triplatin in patients with TNBC, producing a significant advantage over carboplatin in this setting. Selective precision medicine agents, such as Triplatin, that are active against chemotherapy-resistant disease and exploit molecular biomarkers like sGAGs may significantly benefit patients in this setting.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Syndecan-1 facilitates breast cancer metastasis to the brain

PurposeAlthough survival rates for patients with localized breast cancer have increased, patients with metastatic breast cancer still have poor prognosis. Understanding key factors involved in promoting breast cancer metastasis is imperative for better treatments. In this study, we investigated the role of syndecan-1 (Sdc1) in breast cancer metastasis. MethodsTo assess the role of Sdc1 in breast cancer metastasis, we silenced Sdc1 expression in the triple-negative breast cancer human MDA-MB-231 cell line and overexpressed it in the mouse mammary carcinoma 4T1 cell line. Intracardiac injections were performed in an experimental mouse metastasis model using both cell lines. In vitro transwell blood-brain barrier (BBB) and brain section adhesion assays were utilized to specifically investigate how Sdc1 promotes brain metastasis. A cytokine array was performed to evaluate differences in the breast cancer cell secretome when Sdc1 was silenced. ResultsSilencing expression of Sdc1 in breast cancer cells significantly reduced metastasis to the brain. Conversely, overexpression of Sdc1 increased metastasis to the brain. We found that the reduction in brain metastases with Sdc1 knockdown was likely due to reduced breast cancer cell migration across the BBB and adhesion to the perivascular regions of the brain. However, there was no change in attachment to brain endothelial cells or astrocytes. Loss of Sdc1 also led to changes in breast cancer cell-secreted cytokines, which may influence the BBB. ConclusionsTaken together, our study demonstrates a role for Sdc1 in promoting breast cancer metastasis to the brain. These findings suggest that Sdc1 supports breast cancer cell migration across the BBB through regulation of cytokines, which may modulate the BBB. Further elucidating this mechanism will allow for the development of therapeutic strategies to combat brain metastasis.

cancer biology↗