bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ichikawa, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Ichikawa, N..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Generalizable neuromarker for autism spectrum disorder across imaging sites and developmental stages: A multi-site study

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a lifelong condition, and its underlying biological mechanisms remain elusive. The complexity of various factors, including inter-site and development-related differences, makes it challenging to develop generalizable neuroimaging-based biomarkers for ASD. This study used a large-scale, multi-site dataset of 730 Japanese adults to develop a generalizable neuromarker for ASD across independent sites (U.S., Belgium, and Japan) and different developmental stages (children and adolescents). Our adult ASD neuromarker achieved successful generalization for the US and Belgium adults (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.70) and Japanese adults (AUC = 0.81). The neuromarker demonstrated significant generalization for children (AUC = 0.66) and adolescents (AUC = 0.71; all P<0.05, family-wise-error corrected). We identified 141 functional connections (FCs) important for discriminating individuals with ASD from TDCs. These FCs largely centered on social brain regions such as the amygdala, hippocampus, dorsomedial and ventromedial prefrontal cortices, and temporal cortices. Finally, we mapped schizophrenia (SCZ) and major depressive disorder (MDD) onto the biological axis defined by the neuromarker and explored the biological continuity of ASD with SCZ and MDD. We observed that SCZ, but not MDD, was located proximate to ASD on the biological dimension defined by the ASD neuromarker. The successful generalization in multifarious datasets and the observed relations of ASD with SCZ on the biological dimensions provide new insights for a deeper understanding of ASD.

neuroscience↗

A Large-Scale ENIGMA Multisite Replication Study of Brain Age in Depression

BackgroundSeveral studies have evaluated whether depressed persons have older appearing brains than their nondepressed peers. However, the estimated neuroimaging-derived "brain age gap" has varied from study to study, likely driven by differences in training and testing sample (size), age range, and used modality/features. To validate our previously developed ENIGMA brain age model and the identified brain age gap, we aim to replicate the presence and effect size estimate previously found in the largest study in depression to date (N=2,126 controls & N=2,675 cases; +1.08 years [SE 0.22], Cohens d=0.14, 95% CI: 0.08-0.20), in independent cohorts that were not part of the original study. MethodsA previously trained brain age model (www.photon-ai.com/enigma_brainage) based on 77 FreeSurfer brain regions of interest was used to obtain unbiased brain age predictions in 751 controls and 766 persons with depression (18-75 years) from 13 new cohorts collected from 20 different scanners. ResultsOur ENIGMA MDD brain age model generalized reasonably well to controls from the new cohorts (predicted age vs. age: r = 0.73, R2=0.47, MAE=7.50 years), although the performance varied from cohort to cohort. In these new cohorts, on average, depressed persons showed a significantly higher brain age gap of +1 year (SE 0.35) (Cohens d{square}={square}{square}.15, 95% CI: 0.05-0.25) compared with controls, highly similar to our previous finding. ConclusionsThis study further validates our previously developed ENIGMA brain age algorithm. Importantly, we replicated the brain age gap in depression with a comparable effect size. Thus, two large-scale independent mega-analyses across in total 32 cohorts and >3,400 patients and >2,800 controls worldwide show reliable but subtle effects of brain aging in adult depression.

neuroscience↗

Resting-state brain activity can predict target-independent aptitude in fMRI-neurofeedback training

Neurofeedback (NF) aptitude, which refers to an individuals ability to change its brain activity through NF training, has been reported to vary significantly from person to person. The prediction of individual NF aptitudes is critical in clinical NF applications. In the present study, we extracted the resting-state functional brain connectivity (FC) markers of NF aptitude independent of NF-targeting brain regions. We combined the data in fMRI-NF studies targeting four different brain regions at two independent sites (obtained from 59 healthy adults and six patients with major depressive disorder) to collect the resting-state fMRI data associated with aptitude scores in subsequent fMRI-NF training. We then trained the regression models to predict the individual NF aptitude scores from the resting-state fMRI data using a discovery dataset from one site and identified six resting-state FCs that predicted NF aptitude. Next we validated the prediction model using independent test data from another site. The result showed that the posterior cingulate cortex was the functional hub among the brain regions and formed predictive resting-state FCs, suggesting NF aptitude may be involved in the attentional mode-orientation modulation systems characteristics in task-free resting-state brain activity.

neuroscience↗

Common brain networks between major depressive disorder and symptoms of depression that are validated for independent cohorts

Many studies have highlighted the difficulty inherent to the clinical application of fundamental neuroscience knowledge based on machine learning techniques. It is difficult to generalize machine learning brain markers to the data acquired from independent imaging sites, mainly due to large site differences in functional magnetic resonance imaging. We address the difficulty of finding a generalizable major depressive disorder (MDD) brain network markers which would distinguish patients from healthy controls (a classifier) or would predict symptom severity (a prediction model) based on resting state functional connectivity patterns. For the discovery dataset with 713 participants from 4 imaging sites, we removed site differences using our recently developed harmonization method and developed a machine learning MDD brain network markers. The classifier achieved 70% generalization accuracy, and the prediction model moderately well predicted symptom severity for an independent validation dataset with 449 participants from 4 different imaging sites. Finally, we found common 2 functional connections between those related to MDD diagnosis and those related to depression symptoms. The successful generalization to the perfectly independent dataset acquired from multiple imaging sites is novel and ensures scientific reproducibility and clinical applicability.

neuroscience↗

Harmonization of resting-state functional MRI data across multiple imaging sites via the separation of site differences into sampling bias and measurement bias

When collecting large neuroimaging data associated with psychiatric disorders, images must be acquired from multiple sites because of the limited capacity of a single site. However, site differences represent the greatest barrier when acquiring multi-site neuroimaging data. We utilized a traveling-subject dataset in conjunction with a multi-site, multi-disorder dataset to demonstrate that site differences are composed of biological sampling bias and engineering measurement bias. Effects on resting-state functional MRI connectivity because of both bias types were greater than or equal to those because of psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, our findings indicated that each site can sample only from among a subpopulation of participants. This result suggests that it is essential to collect large neuroimaging data from as many sites as possible to appropriately estimate the distribution of the grand population. Finally, we developed a novel harmonization method that removed only the measurement bias by using traveling-subject dataset and achieved the reduction of the measurement bias by 29% and the improvement of the signal to noise ratios by 40%.

neuroscience↗

Overlapping but asymmetrical relationships between schizophrenia and autism revealed by brain connectivity

(Abstract included 248 words)Although the relationship between schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has long been debated, it has not yet been fully elucidated. To address this issue, we took advantage of dual (ASD and SSD) classifiers that discriminate patients from their controls based on resting state brain functional connectivity. An SSD classifier using sophisticated machine-learning algorithms that automatically selected SSD- specific functional connections was applied to Japanese datasets including adult patients with SSD in a chronic stage. We demonstrated good performance of the SSD classification for independent validation cohorts. The generalizability was tested by USA and European cohorts in a chronic stage, and one USA cohort including first episode schizophrenia. The specificity was tested by two adult Japanese cohorts of ASD and major depressive disorder, and one European cohort of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. The weighted linear summation of the classifiers functional connections constituted the biological dimensions representing neural liability to the disorders. Our previously developed robust ASD classifier constituted the ASD dimension. Distributions of individuals with SSD, ASD and healthy controls were examined on the SSD and ASD biological dimensions. The SSD and ASD populations exhibited overlapping but asymmetrical patterns on the two biological dimensions. That is, the SSD population showed increased liability on the ASD dimension, but not vice versa. Furthermore, the two dimensions were correlated within the ASD population but not the SSD population. Using the two biological dimensions based on resting-state functional connectivity enabled us to quantify and visualize the relationships between SSD and ASD.

neuroscience↗

A prediction model of working memory across health and psychiatric disease using whole-brain functional connectivity

Individual differences in cognitive function have been shown to correlate with brain-wide functional connectivity, suggesting a common foundation relating connectivity to cognitive function across healthy populations. However, it remains unknown whether this relationship is preserved in cognitive deficits seen in a range of psychiatric disorders. Using machine learning methods, we built a prediction model of working memory function from whole-brain functional connectivity among a healthy population (N = 17, age 19-24 years). We applied this normative model to a series of independently collected resting state functional connectivity datasets (N = 968), involving multiple psychiatric diagnoses, sites, ages (18-65 years), and ethnicities. We found that predicted working memory ability was correlated with actually measured working memory performance in both schizophrenia patients (partial correlation,{rho} = 0.25, P = 0.033, N = 58) and a healthy population (partial correlation,{rho} = 0.11, P = 0.0072, N = 474). Moreover, the model predicted diagnosis-specific severity of working memory impairments in schizophrenia (N = 58, with 60 controls), major depressive disorder (N = 77, with 63 controls), obsessive-compulsive disorder (N = 46, with 50 controls), and autism spectrum disorder (N = 69, with 71 controls) with effect sizes g = -0.68, -0.29, -0.19, and 0.09, respectively. According to the model, each diagnosiss working memory impairment resulted from the accumulation of distinct functional connectivity differences that characterizes each diagnosis, including both diagnosis-specific and diagnosis-invariant functional connectivity differences. Severe working memory impairment in schizophrenia was related not only with fronto-parietal, but also widespread network changes. Autism spectrum disorder showed greater negative connectivity that related to improved working memory function, suggesting that some non-normative functional connections can be behaviorally advantageous. Our results suggest that the relationship between brain connectivity and working memory function in healthy populations can be generalized across multiple psychiatric diagnoses. This approach may shed new light on behavioral variances in psychiatric disease and suggests that whole-brain functional connectivity can provide an individual quantitative behavioral profile in a range of psychiatric disorders.

neuroscience↗