bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hyde, L. W.

Publications and source records attributed to Hyde, L. W..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Epigenetic and brain age across development: Performance and associations in the MIND consortium

Understanding how biological age measures perform across development lays the groundwork for investigations into lifespan trajectories of healthy aging. We provide the most comprehensive assessment of epigenetic and brain age models across development (birth to 24 years; [≤]20,917 observations across 15 cohorts), evaluating how these models associate with chronological age and with each other, and how these associations change across development. Chronological age-prediction accuracy of epigenetic and brain age models was modest and varied substantially. Accuracy improved with age and stabilized by middle childhood. Few brain and fewer epigenetic clocks performed stably and well across all developmental stages. Performance was better when age range and tissue corresponded between training and testing data. Associations between epigenetic-brain age residuals were small, and changed little across development, tissues or clock generation. Given this developmentally dynamic system of epigenetic-brain age performances and associations, we give key recommendations to improve developmental research in this field.

neuroscience↗

Somatomotor disconnection links sleep duration with socioeconomic context, screen time, cognition, and psychopathology

BackgroundSleep is critical for healthy brain development and emotional wellbeing, especially during adolescence when sleep, behavior, and neurobiology are rapidly evolving. Theoretical reviews and empirical research have historically focused on how sleep influences mental health through its impact on higher-order brain systems. No studies have leveraged data-driven network neuroscience methods to uncover interpretable, brain-wide signatures of sleep duration in adolescence, their socio-environmental origins, or their consequences for cognition and mental health. MethodsHere, we implement graph theory and component-based predictive modeling to examine how a multimodal index of sleep duration is associated with intrinsic brain architecture in 3,173 youth (11-12 years) from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM Study. ResultsWe demonstrate that network integration/segregation exhibit a strong, generalizable multivariate association with sleep duration. We next identify a single component of brain architecture centered on a single network as the dominant contributor of this relationship. This component is characterized by increasing disconnection of a lower-order system - the somatomotor network - from other systems, with shorter sleep duration. Finally, greater somatomotor disconnection is associated with lower socioeconomic resources, longer screen times, reduced cognitive/academic performance, and elevated externalizing problems. ConclusionsThese findings reveal a novel neural signature of shorter sleep in adolescence that is intertwined with environmental risk, cognition, and psychopathology. By robustly elucidating the key involvement of an understudied brain system in sleep, cognition, and psychopathology, this study can inform theoretical and translational research directions on sleep to promote neurobehavioral development and mental health during the adolescent transition.

neuroscience↗

Current Reporting Practices in Human Neuroscience Research

Concerns for the replicability, reliability, and generalizability of human neuroimaging research have led to intense debates over sample size and open science practices, with more recent attention on the contributions of sampling and recruitment practices. Key to understanding the state of neuroscience research is an assessment of reporting practices that influence replicability, reliability, and generalizability. In this structured review, we evaluated reporting practice across three domains: (1) demographic (e.g., reporting participant race-ethnicity, age, any measure of socioeconomic position), (2) methodological (e.g., reporting recruitment methods, inclusion and exclusion criteria, why participants were excluded from analyses), and (3) open science and generalizability (e.g., analyses were preregistered, target population was stated). Included were 919 published MRI and fMRI studies from 2019 in nine top-ranked journals (N = 3,856 records screened). Reporting across domains was infrequent, with participant racial or ethnic identity (14.8%), reasons for missing imaging data (31.2%), and identification of a target population (19.4%) being particularly low/underreported. Reporting likelihood varied by study characteristics (e.g., participant age group) and was correlated across domains. The median sample size of studies was 55 participants. Study sample size, reporting frequency, was positively associated with two-year citation counts, providing some evidence that the complete reporting of demographic characteristics, methodological decisions, and open science and generalizability practices may not be as valued as study sample size. Recommendations for structural interventions at the journal level are proposed.

neuroscience↗

Assessing neurocognitive maturation in early adolescence based on baby and adult functional brain landscapes

Adolescence is a period of growth in cognitive performance and functioning. Recently, data-driven measures of brain-age gap, which can index cognitive decline in older populations, have been utilized in adolescent data with mixed findings. Instead of using a data-driven approach, here we assess the maturation status of the brain functional landscape in early adolescence by directly comparing an individuals resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) to the canonical early-life and adulthood communities. Specifically, we hypothesized that the degree to which a youths connectome is better captured by adult networks compared to infant/toddler networks is predictive of their cognitive development. To test this hypothesis across individuals and longitudinally, we utilized the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study at baseline (9-10 years; n = 6,489) and 2-year-follow-up (Y2: 11-12 years; n = 5,089). Adjusted for demographic factors, our anchored rsFC score (AFC) was associated with better task performance both across and within participants. AFC was related to age and aging across youth, and change in AFC statistically mediated the age-related change in task performance. In conclusion, we showed that a model-fitting-free index of the brain at rest that is anchored to both adult and baby connectivity landscapes predicts cognitive performance and development in youth.

neuroscience↗

Socioeconomic resources in youth are linked to divergent patterns of network integration and segregation across the brain's transmodal axis

Socioeconomic resources (SER) calibrate the developing brain to the current context, which can confer or attenuate risk for psychopathology across the lifespan. Recent multivariate work indicates that SER levels powerfully influence intrinsic functional connectivity patterns across the entire brain. Nevertheless, the neurobiological meaning of these widespread alterations remains poorly understood, despite its translational promise for early risk identification, targeted intervention, and policy reform. In the present study, we leverage the resources of graph theory to precisely characterize multivariate and univariate associations between household SER and the functional integration and segregation (i.e., participation coefficient, within-module degree) of brain regions across major cognitive, affective, and sensorimotor systems during the resting state in 5,821 youth (ages 9-10 years) from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. First, we establish that decomposing the brain into profiles of integration and segregation captures more than half of the multivariate association between SER and functional connectivity with greater parsimony (100-fold reduction in number of features) and interpretability. Second, we show that the topological effects of SER are not uniform across the brain; rather, higher SER levels are related to greater integration of somatomotor and subcortical systems, but greater segregation of default mode, orbitofrontal, and cerebellar systems. Finally, we demonstrate that the effects of SER are spatially patterned along the unimodal-transmodal gradient of brain organization. These findings provide critical interpretive context for the established and widespread effects of SER on brain organization, indicating that SER levels differentially configure the intrinsic functional architecture of developing unimodal and transmodal systems. This study highlights both sensorimotor and higher-order networks that may serve as neural markers of environmental stress and opportunity, and which may guide efforts to scaffold healthy neurobehavioral development among disadvantaged communities of youth.

neuroscience↗

Socioeconomic Resources are Associated with Distributed Alterations of the Brain's Intrinsic Functional Architecture in Youth

Little is known about how exposure to limited socioeconomic resources (SER) in childhood gets "under the skin" to shape brain development, especially using rigorous whole-brain multivariate methods in large, adequately powered samples. The present study examined resting state functional connectivity patterns from 5,821 youth in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, employing multivariate methods across three levels: whole-brain, network-wise, and connection-wise. Across all three levels, SER was associated with widespread alterations across the connectome. However, critically, we found that parental education was the primary driver of neural associations of SER. These parental education associations were robust to additional tests for confounding by head motion, and they exhibited notable concentrations in somatosensory and subcortical regions. Moreover, parental education associations with the developing connectome were partially accounted for by home enrichment activities, childs cognitive abilities, and childs grades, indicating interwoven links between parental education, child stimulation, and child cognitive performance. These results add a new data-driven, multivariate perspective on links between household SER and the childs developing functional connectome.

neuroscience↗

Assessing the Structure and Specificity of Polygenic Scores for Psychiatric Disorders in a Population-based Cohort of Older Adults

Although psychiatric phenotypes are hypothesized to organize into a two-factor internalizing - externalizing structure, few studies have evaluated the structure of psychopathology in older adults, nor explored whether genome-wide polygenic scores (PGSs) are associated with psychopathology in a domain-specific manner. We used data from 6,216 individuals of European ancestry from the Health and Retirement Study, a large population-based sample of older adults in the United States. Confirmatory factor analyses were applied to validated measures of psychopathology and PGSs were derived from well-powered GWAS. Genomic SEM was implemented to construct latent PGSs for internalizing, externalizing, and general psychopathology. Phenotypically, the data were best characterized by a single general factor of psychopathology, a factor structure that was replicated across genders and age groups. Although externalizing PGSs (cannabis use, antisocial behavior, alcohol dependence, ADHD) were not associated with any phenotypes, PGSs for MDD, neuroticism, and anxiety disorders were associated with both internalizing and externalizing phenotypes. Moreover, the latent internalizing PGS and the latent one-factor PGS, derived using weights from Genomic SEM, explained 1% more variance in the general factor of psychopathology than any of the individual PGSs. Results support the following conclusions: genetic risk factors for and phenotypic markers of psychiatric disorders are transdiagnostic in European ancestries, GWAS-derived PGSs fail to capture genetic variation associated with disease specificity in European ancestries, and blunt phenotypic measurement in GWAS may preclude our ability to evaluate the structure and specificity of genetic contributions to psychiatric disorders.

genomics↗

Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study

The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study is an ongoing, nationwide study of the effects of environmental influences on behavioral and brain development in adolescents. The ABCD Study is a collaborative effort, including a Coordinating Center, 21 data acquisition sites across the United States, and a Data Analysis and Informatics Center (DAIC). The main objective of the study is to recruit and assess over eleven thousand 9-10-year-olds and follow them over the course of 10 years to characterize normative brain and cognitive development, the many factors that influence brain development, and the effects of those factors on mental health and other outcomes. The study employs state-of-the-art multimodal brain imaging, cognitive and clinical assessments, bioassays, and careful assessment of substance use, environment, psychopathological symptoms, and social functioning. The data will provide a resource of unprecedented scale and depth for studying typical and atypical development. Here, we describe the baseline neuroimaging processing and subject-level analysis methods used by the ABCD DAIC in the centralized processing and extraction of neuroanatomical and functional imaging phenotypes. Neuroimaging processing and analyses include modality-specific corrections for distortions and motion, brain segmentation and cortical surface reconstruction derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), analysis of brain microstructure using diffusion MRI (dMRI), task-related analysis of functional MRI (fMRI), and functional connectivity analysis of resting-state fMRI.\n\nHighlightsO_LIAn overview of the MRI processing pipeline for the ABCD Study\nC_LIO_LIA discussion on the challenges of large, multisite population studies\nC_LIO_LIA methodological reference for users of publicly shared data from the ABCD Study\nC_LI

neuroscience↗