bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hutchinson, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Hutchinson, C..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Proton FLASH preserves neurocognition across delivery techniques: implications for clinical translation in pediatric brain tumors

BackgroundRadiation therapy is integral to the curative treatment of childhood brain tumors but contributes to late neurocognitive impairment in survivors. FLASH (ultra-high dose rate, >40Gy/s) reduces normal-tissue toxicity in preclinical models, and proton-FLASH is currently the only modality capable of delivering ultra-high dose rates to the deep targets, such as pediatric brain tumors. However, two questions remain unresolved before clinical translation: (1) whether the FLASH effect can be achieved on synchrotron-based proton systems, which deliver protons in discrete spills that may be insufficient to cover a clinical target within a single delivery, and (2) which dose-rate metric, among the multiple definitions currently used in the field, best predicts the biological FLASH effect. MethodsC57BL/6 mice (7-8 weeks) received 10 Gy whole-brain RT via a clinical Hitachi ProBEAT synchrotron with CBCT-guided delivery, using three transmission-beam techniques: single-spill pencil beam scanning (SS PBS), multi-spill PBS with [~]2-second inter-spot delay (MS PBS), and passive scatter (PS), compared to conventional (CONV) delivery and unirradiated controls (n=24-28/group, equal sex distribution). Dose rate was quantified using three frameworks: field dose rate (FDR), PBS dose rate (PBSDR), and dose-averaged dose rate (DADR). Recognition memory was assessed by novel object recognition (NOR) at 6 weeks post-RT, and cognitive flexibility was assessed via touchscreen visual discrimination and reversal learning at 14 weeks. Hippocampal neuroinflammation was evaluated by immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry for Iba1, NeuN, and GFAP. ResultsFLASH conditions were met by SS PBS and PS under all three dose-rate definitions, but MS PBS qualified as FLASH only by DADR. Despite this, neuroprotection was preserved across all three FLASH techniques: discrimination index was significantly higher for SS PBS (P=0.021), MS PBS (P=0.008), and PS (P<0.001) versus CONV, with no significant difference between FLASH techniques. On touchscreen testing, FLASH-treated females demonstrated preserved cognitive flexibility (P=0.047 vs. CONV on reversal learning correct trials). Iba1+ microglia were reduced in FLASH compared to CONV mice, with morphology suggestive of preserved homeostatic state. ConclusionsSynchrotron-based proton FLASH preserves neurocognitive function across all delivery techniques, including under multi-spill delivery essential for treating clinical-scale pediatric brain tumors. Critically, this neuroprotection was observed even for deliveries that qualified as FLASH only by DADR, identifying DADR as the dose-rate metric most relevant to the biological FLASH effect with direct implications for clinical trial design and dose-rate reporting standards.

cancer biology↗

PU.1 inhibition sensitizes stem-monocytic AML to BCL2 blockade

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) exhibits substantial transcriptional heterogeneity across differentiation states that influences therapeutic response to BCL2 inhibition with venetoclax. While hematopoietic stem cell (HSC)-like AMLs show high sensitivity to venetoclax and monocytic-like AMLs demonstrate resistance, the therapeutic behavior of leukemias harboring both transcriptional programs remains poorly defined. Analysis of a large AML cohort reveals a distinct patient population exhibiting concurrent HSC- and monocyte-like transcriptional signatures, which we term stem-monocytic AML. Ex vivo drug sensitivity profiling demonstrates that stem-monocytic AMLs exhibit venetoclax resistance comparable to pure monocytic disease, despite expressing HSC-like transcriptional features. Using a leukemia cell line model that recapitulates stem-monocytic AML characteristics, we show through immunophenotyping and single-cell lineage tracing that venetoclax preferentially depletes immature blasts while sparing differentiated monocytic populations. Single-cell transcriptomic and chromatin accessibility analyses identify enrichment of myeloid differentiation transcription factors, particularly PU.1, in resistant populations. A targeted CRISPR knockout screen confirms that PU.1 disruption induces differentiation arrest and enhances venetoclax sensitivity primarily in the immature immunophenotypic compartments. Pharmacologic PU.1 inhibition with the small molecule DB2313 synergizes with venetoclax in both cell line models and primary patient samples. These findings establish stem-monocytic AML as a transcriptionally and functionally distinct subtype and nominate combined PU.1 and BCL2 inhibition as a rational therapeutic strategy for improving venetoclax response in this patient population.

cancer biology↗

COMBINATION THERAPIES TARGETING ALK-ABERRANT NEUROBLASTOMA IN PRECLINICAL MODELS.

BackgroundALK activating mutations are identified in approximately 10% of newly diagnosed neuroblastomas and ALK amplifications in a further 1-2% of cases. Lorlatinib, a third generation ALK inhibitor, will soon be given alongside induction chemotherapy for children with ALK-aberrant neuroblastoma. However, resistance to single agent treatment has been reported and therapies that improve the response duration are urgently required. We studied the preclinical combination of lorlatinib with chemotherapy, or with the MDM2 inhibitor, idasanutlin, as recent data has suggested that ALK inhibitor resistance can be overcome through activation of the p53-MDM2 pathway. AimsTo study the preclinical activity of ALK inhibitors alone and in combination with chemotherapy or idasanutlin. MethodsWe compared different ALK inhibitors in preclinical models prior to evaluating lorlatinib in combination with chemotherapy or idasanutlin. We developed a triple chemotherapy (CAV: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine) in vivo dosing schedule and applied this to both neuroblastoma genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) and patient derived xenografts (PDX). ResultsLorlatinib in combination with chemotherapy was synergistic in immunocompetent neuroblastoma GEMM. Significant growth inhibition in response to lorlatinib was only observed in the ALK-amplified PDX model with the highest ALK expression. In this PDX lorlatinib combined with idasanutlin resulted in complete tumor regression and significantly delayed tumor regrowth. ConclusionOur study suggests that in neuroblastoma, high ALK expression could be associated with response to lorlatinib and either chemotherapy or idasanutlin. The synergy between MDM2 inhibition and ALK inhibition warrants further evaluation of this combination as a potential clinical approach for children with neuroblastoma. STATEMENT OF TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCENeuroblastoma is a pediatric tumor of the developing sympathetic nervous system. Around 50% of high-risk neuroblastoma patients are curable. Mutations or amplification of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) have emerged as a marker with which to further risk-stratify patients. The ALK inhibitor lorlatinib will soon be used alongside chemotherapy in upfront treatment of high-risk patients with ALK-aberrant disease. In this preclinical study, we used a panel of ALK aberrant neuroblastoma models to evaluate ALK inhibitors focusing on lorlatinib in combination with conventional chemotherapy and the small molecule MDM2 inhibitor idasanutlin. In both approaches we found synergy in models with high basal ALK expression without MAPK pathway alterations. We conclude that in neuroblastoma the level of ALK expression could be an additional biomarker predictive of clinical response to ALK inhibitors.

cancer biology↗

Non-invasive imaging platform reveals a potential tumourigenicity hazard of systemically administered cells

BackgroundCell-based regenerative medicine therapies are now frequently tested in clinical trials. In many conditions, cell therapies are administered systemically, but there is little understanding of their fate, and adverse events are often under-reported. Currently, it is only possible to assess safety and fate of cell therapies in preclinical studies, specifically by monitoring animals longitudinally using multimodal imaging approaches. Here, using a suite of in vivo imaging modalities to explore the fate of a range of human and murine cells, we investigate how route of administration, cell type and host immune status affect the fate of administered cells.\n\nMethodsWe applied a unique imaging toolkit combining bioluminescence, optoacoustic and magnetic resonance imaging modalities to assess the safety of different human and murine cell types by following their biodistribution and persistence in mice following administration into the venous or arterial system. Results: Longitudinal imaging analyses (i) suggested that the intra-arterial route may be more hazardous than intravenous administration for certain cell types; (ii) revealed that the potential of a mouse mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC) line to form tumours, depended on administration route and mouse strain; and (iii) indicated that clinically tested human umbilical cord (hUC)-derived MSCs can transiently and unexpectedly proliferate when administered intravenously to mice.\n\nConclusionsIn order to perform an adequate safety assessment of potential cell-based therapies, a thorough understanding of cell biodistribution and fate post administration is required. The non-invasive imaging toolbox used here can expose not only the general organ distribution of these therapies, but also a detailed view of their presence within different organs and, importantly, tumourigenic potential. Our observation that the hUC-MSCs but not the human bone marrow (hBM)-derived MSCs persisted for a period in some animals, suggests that therapies with these cells should proceed with caution.

cell biology↗