bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Husemann, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Husemann, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Urbanisation drives biodiversity loss, fitness decline and community shifts in cavity-nesting Hymenoptera

Urbanisation is reshaping landscapes worldwide, posing challenges to biodiversity and ecosystem function. Cavity-nesting Hymenoptera, including bees and wasps, deliver vital ecological services but are increasingly vulnerable to urbanisation. In this citizen science-based study, we deployed 286 trap nests across Leipzig and Hamburg (Germany) to investigate how urbanisation and landscape-scale environmental features influence the diversity, community composition, reproductive success, offspring survival and demographic status of these insects. Using Bayesian hierarchical and phylogenetically informed modelling, we found that urbanisation significantly reduced species richness, reproductive output and offspring survival in both guilds, despite stable nesting activity, suggesting potential ecological trap effects. For bees, urbanisation also reduced the probability of nests functioning as demographic sources. Environmental drivers shaped responses in taxon-specific ways: bee richness and survival increased with landscape diversity but declined with fragmentation, while wasp richness and nesting declined with higher temperatures, though survival increased with more green cover. Bee nests were more likely to serve as demographic sources in higher temperatures. Community composition responses also diverged; bee communities shifted via increased species turnover, while wasp assemblages remained relatively stable. Temperature was a major driver of compositional dissimilarity in both groups, whereas landscape diversity was associated with homogenisation in bees and diversification in wasps. Our findings demonstrate that cities filter cavity-nesting Hymenoptera through multiple ecological pathways, highlighting the need for differentiated conservation strategies that consider both habitat structure and taxon-specific responses.

ecology↗

New estimates of genome size in Orthoptera and their evolutionary implications

Animal genomes vary widely in size, and much of their architecture and content remains poorly understood. Even among related groups, such as orders of insects, genomes may vary in size by orders of magnitude - for reasons unknown. The largest known insect genomes were repeatedly found in Orthoptera, e.g., Podisma pedestris (1C = 16.93 pg), Stethophyma grossum (1C = 18.48 pg) and Bryodemella holdereri (1C = 18.64 pg). While all these species belong to the suborder of Caelifera, the ensiferan Deracantha onos (1C = 19.60 pg) was recently found to have the largest genome. Here, we present new genome size estimates of 50 further species of Ensifera (superfamilies Gryllidea, Tettigoniidea) and Caelifera (Acrididae, Tetrigidae) based on flow cytometric measurements. We found that Bryodemella tuberculata (Caelifera: Acrididae) has the so far largest measured genome of all insects with 1C = 21.96 pg (21.48 gBp). Species with 2n = 16 and 2n = 22 chromosomes have significantly larger genomes than species with other chromosome counts. Gryllidea genomes vary between 1C = 0.95 and 2.88 pg, and Tetrigidae between 1C = 2.18 and 2.41, while the genomes of all other studied Orthoptera range in size from 1C = 1.37 to 21.96 pg. Reconstructing ancestral genome sizes based on a phylogenetic tree of mitochondrial genomic data, we found genome size values of >15.84 pg only for the nodes of Bryodemella holdereri / B. tuberculata and Chrysochraon dispar / Euthystira brachyptera. The predicted values of ancestral genome sizes are 6.19 pg for Orthoptera, 5.37 pg for Ensifera, and 7.28 pg for Caelifera. The reasons for the large genomes in Orthoptera remain largely unknown, but a duplication seems unlikely as chromosome numbers do not differ. Sequence-based genomic studies may shed light on the underlying evolutionary mechanisms.

genomics↗