bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Huntley, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Huntley, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Mechanisms regulating combination effect of antibody-drug conjugates and cancer immunotherapy

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a transformative class of cancer therapeutics with important challenges still to be addressed. Combination of ADC with immunotherapy is a promising strategy but mechanisms and effective application remain to be determined. We evaluated ADC combinations with T cell engagers (TCEs) and checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). ADC-TCE combinations produced robust antitumor activity independent of antigen and payload and persisted despite ADC-related T cell loss. Efficacy was dominated by a direct effect of ADC on tumor cells. ADCs induced autophagy that upregulated TNF receptors (TNFRs) and mannose-6-phosphate receptors (M6PR). When ADCs were combined with TCEs TNF released by T cells was primarily responsible for potent antitumor effect of combination. In contrast, M6PR was dispensable for ADC-TCE activity but critical for combinations with CPI expanded antigen-specific T cells via enhanced granzyme B uptake. These data reveal a unifying, target- and payload-agnostic mechanism enabling rational ADC-immunotherapy combinations. SignificanceThis is first evidence that ADC-induced tumor cell autophagy via up-regulation of TNFR and M6PR could be responsible for potent antitumor effect of combination of ADC with TCE. TCEs exploit a TNF-TNFR axis, whereas antigen-specific T cells leverage granzyme B-M6PR uptake. This mechanistic framework explains broad ADC-TCE synergy and guides rational selection of ADC-immunotherapy combinations beyond checkpoint blockade.

immunology↗

Does the margin of stability measure predict stability of gait with a constrained base of support?

This study aimed to determine the validity of the centre of mass position (COM) position and extrapolated COM (XCOM), relative to the base of support, for predicting stability during a walking task where the base of support is constrained. Nine young healthy participants walked on a narrow beam. Three-dimensional motion capture was used to calculate the COM and XCOM relative to the base of support. Steps were classified as having either the COM or XCOM inside or outside the base of support, and were classified as successful (stable - foot placed on the beam) or failed (unstable - foot stepped off the beam). If the COM or XCOM are valid measures of stability, they should be within the base of support for successful steps and outside the base of support for failed steps. Classifying the COM and XCOM inside or outside the base of support correctly predicted successful or failed steps in 69% and 58% of cases, respectively. When the COM or XCOM were outside the base of support, walking faster seemed to help participants to maintain stability. The further the COM or XCOM were outside the base of support during a successful step, the more likely participants were to fail on a subsequent step. The results of this study suggest that both COM and XCOM are valid measures of stability during a beam walking task, but that classifying COM and XCOM as inside or outside the base of support may be over-simplistic.

bioengineering↗