Hulbert, J. C. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2022

Reduced Hippocampal-Cortical Connectivity During Memory Suppression Predicts the Ability to Forget Unwanted Memories

The ability to suppress unwelcome memories is important for productivity and well-being. Successful memory suppression is associated with hippocampal deactivations and a concomitant disruption of this regions functionality. Much of the previous neuroimaging literature exploring such suppression-related hippocampal modulations has focused on the regions negative coupling with the prefrontal cortex. In contrast, task-based changes in functional connectivity between the hippocampus and other brain regions have remained relatively underexplored. Here, we utilize psychophysiological interactions and seed connectome-based predictive modeling (seed-CPM) to investigate the relationship between the hippocampus and the rest of the brain as 134 participants attempted to suppress unwanted memories during the Think/No-Think task. The results show that during retrieval suppression, the right hippocampus exhibited decreased functional connectivity with visual cortical areas (bilateral intracalcarine cortex, right cuneal cortex, left lingual gyrus, right supracalcarine cortex, right occipital pole), left nucleus accumbens and the brain-stem that predicted superior forgetting of unwanted memories on later memory tests. Validation tests verified that prediction performance was not an artifact of head motion or prediction method and that the negative features remained consistent across different brain parcellations. These findings suggest that systemic memory suppression involves more than the modulation of hippocampal activity--it alters functional connectivity patterns between the hippocampus and visual cortex, leading to successful forgetting.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Reductions in Retrieval Competition Predict the Benefit of Repeated Testing

Repeated testing leads to improved long-term memory retention compared to repeated study, but the mechanism underlying this improvement remains controversial. In this work, we test the hypothesis that retrieval practice benefits subsequent recall by reducing competition from related memories. This hypothesis implies that the degree of reduction in competition between retrieval practice attempts should predict subsequent memory for practiced items. To test this prediction, we collected electroencephalography (EEG) data across two sessions. In the first session, participants practiced selectively retrieving exemplars from superordinate semantic categories (high competition), as well as retrieving the names of the superordinate categories from exemplars (low competition). In the second session, participants repeatedly studied and were tested on Swahili-English vocabulary. One week after session two, participants were again tested on the vocabulary. We trained a within-subject classifier on the data from session one to distinguish high and low competition states.We then used this classifier to measure competition across multiple retrieval practice attempts in the second session. The degree to which competition decreased for a given vocabulary word predicted whether that item was subsequently remembered in the third session. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that repeated testing improves retention by reducing competition.

neuroscience↗