bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Huang, C.-C. F.

Publications and source records attributed to Huang, C.-C. F..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Motif-based model of transcription predicts effects of sequence variants in AR enhancers and reveals distinct functions for AR-associated transcription factors

Androgen receptor (AR)-mediated transcription plays a central role in prostate cancer development and progression, yet the contributions of individual transcription factors (TFs) to AR-dependent enhancer activity remain incompletely understood. Here we use a biophysically motivated, interpretable motif-based model to dissect these contributions from STARR-seq data in LNCaP cells. By fitting the model separately to androgen inducibility and to baseline enhancer activity, we resolve TFs into three functional classes: hormone-dependent drivers, constitutive activators, and dual-role factors that contribute to both. These patterns suggest that inducibility is associated not only with the presence of AR and co-activator motifs, but also with the relative absence of constitutive activators that may saturate enhancer output. We validate the model against an independent saturation-mutagenesis dataset spanning 40 AR enhancers, predicting mutational effects at single-base resolution (AUC = 0.76), and show that direct fitting to these data independently recovers known AR regulators. Finally, we apply the model to prostate cancer GWAS risk alleles in AR binding site regions, prioritizing four candidate variants predicted to reduce the DHT/EtOH enhancer activity ratio at these loci.

genomics↗

Optimized high-throughput screening of non-coding variants identified from genome-wide association studies

The vast majority of disease-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms identified from genome-wide association study (GWAS) are localized in non-coding regions. A significant fraction of these variants impact transcription factors binding to enhancer elements and alter gene expression. To functionally interrogate the activity of such variants we developed snpSTARRseq, a high-throughput experimental method that can interrogate the functional impact of hundreds to thousands of non-coding variants on enhancer activity. snpSTARRseq dramatically improves signal-to-noise by utilizing a novel sequencing and bioinformatic approach that increases both insert size and number of variants tested per loci. Using this strategy, we interrogated 70 of 140 known prostate cancer (PCa) risk-associated loci and demonstrated that 26 (37%) of them harbor 36 SNPs that significantly altered enhancer activity. Combining these results with chromosomal looping data we could identify interacting genes and provide a mechanism of action for 20 PCa GWAS risk regions. When benchmarked to orthogonal methods, snpSTARRseq showed a strong correlation with in vivo experimental allelic-imbalance studies whereas there was no correlation with predictive in silico approaches. Overall, snpSTARRseq provides an integrated experimental and computational framework to functionally test non-coding genetic variants.

genetics↗

Genetic determinants of chromatin reveal prostate cancer risk mediated by context-dependent gene regulation

Methods that link genetic variation to steady-state gene expression levels, such as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), are widely used to functionally annotate trait-associated variants, but they are limited in identifying context-dependent effects on transcription. To address this challenge, we developed the cistrome-wide association study (CWAS), a framework for nominating variants that impact traits through their effects on chromatin state. CWAS associates the genetic determinants of cistromes (e.g., the genome-wide profiles of transcription factor binding sites or histone modifications) with traits using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We performed CWASs of prostate cancer and androgen-related traits, using a reference panel of 307 prostate cistromes from 165 individuals. CWAS nominated susceptibility regulatory elements or androgen receptor (AR) binding sites at 52 out of 98 known prostate cancer GWAS loci and implicated an additional 17 novel loci. We functionally validated a subset of our results using CRISPRi and in vitro reporter assays. At 28 of the 52 risk loci, CWAS identified regulatory mechanisms that are not observable via eQTLs, implicating genes with complex or context-specific regulation that are overlooked by current approaches that relying on steady-state transcript measurements. CWAS genes include transcription factors that govern prostate development such as NKX3-1, HOXB13, GATA2, and KLF5. Moreover, CWAS boosts discovery power in modestly sized GWAS, identifying novel genetic associations mediated through AR binding for androgen-related phenotypes, including resistance to prostate cancer therapy. CWAS is a powerful and biologically interpretable paradigm for studying variants that influence traits by affecting context-dependent transcriptional regulation.

genetics↗

Functional mapping of androgen receptor enhancer activity

Androgen receptor (AR) is critical to the initiation, growth and progression of almost all prostate cancers. Once activated, the AR binds to cis-regulatory enhancer elements on DNA that drive gene expression. Yet, there are 10-100x more binding sites than differentially expressed genes. It still remains unclear how individual sites contribute to AR-mediated transcription. While descriptive functional genomic approaches broadly correlate with enhancer activity, they do not provide the locus-specific resolution needed to delineate the underlying regulatory logic of AR-mediated transcription. Therefore, we functionally tested all commonly occuring clinical AR binding sites with Self-Transcribing Active Regulatory Regions sequencing (STARRseq) to generate the first map of intrinsic AR enhancer activity. This approach is not significantly affected by endogenous chromatin modifications and measures the potential enhancer activity at each cis-regulatory element. Interestingly we found that only 7% of AR binding sites displayed increased enhancer activity upon hormonal stimulation. Instead, the vast majority of AR binding sites were either inactive (81%) or constitutively active enhancers (11%). These annotations strongly correlated with enhancer-associated features in both cell line and clinical prostate cancer. With these validated annotations we next investigated the effect of each enhancer class on transcription and found that AR-driven inducible enhancers frequently interacted with promoters, forming central chromosomal loops critical for gene transcription. We demonstrated that these inducible enhancers act as regulatory hubs that increase contacts with both other AR binding sites and gene promoters. This functional map was used to identify a somatic mutation that significantly reduces the expression of a commonly mutated AR-regulated tumour suppressor. Together, our data reveal a complex interplay between different AR binding sites that work in a highly coordinated manner to drive gene transcription.

cancer biology↗