bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hsu, J. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Hsu, J. S..

11 recordsLinked to original sources

deCYPher: Star Allele-Resolution Computational Framework of Pharmacogenes for Haplotype-Resolved Long-Read Assemblies

Although existing next-generation sequencing (NGS) tools, such as Aldy and Cyrius, have been applied for allele typing, they cannot achieve complete accuracy due to various genomic challenges including pseudogenes, structural variations, hybrid genes, copy number variations, and gene deletions. These complexities make accurate pharmacogene interpretation more challenging, despite the crucial role pharmacogenomics plays in precision medicine. We developed deCYPher, a tool that generates personalized pharmacogenomic reports from haplotype-resolved assemblies. The tool enables analysis of all PharmVar 1A level genes, such as CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A5, CYP4F2, DPYD, NUDT15, and SLCO1B1. Applied to all HPRC haplotypes (including both release 1 and release 2 data), deCYPher demonstrated high accuracy in resolving complex gene structures. In the case of CYP2D6, release 1 identified 6% gene multiplications, 6% full gene deletions, and 4% CYP2D6/CYP2D7 hybrids. By contrast, release 2 demonstrated an increased prevalence of multiplications (14%) and hybrids (11%), while the frequency of full gene deletions remained comparable at 5%. Comparison with pb-StarPhase revealed discrepancies in 12 of 94 assemblies in the release 1 dataset. For instance, in sample HG02257, Aldy, Cyrius, and deCYPher consistently identified the genotype as *2/*35, whereas pb-StarPhase reported *2/*2. Notably, the *35-defining variants were present in the BAM and VCF files in the pb-StarPhase pipeline, but the local read depth over the *35-specific region was only 5x in HG02257-p, suggesting that the misclassification likely resulted from insufficient coverage - a known limitation of pb-StarPhase under low-depth conditions.

bioinformatics↗

gAIRR-wgs: An Algorithm to Genotype T Cell Receptor Alleles Using Whole Genome Sequencing Data

T cell receptor (TR) genes, including variable (TR_V), diversity (TR_D), and joining (TR_J) segments, exhibit allelic diversity that is critical to adaptive immunity. Growing evidence has identified associations between TR genes and immune-related diseases. Germline variants may influence TR gene function and subsequent usage, highlighting the importance of accurate TR allele profiling. However, accurately identifying germline TR from standard WGS data remains challenging due to short read lengths, limited depth, and high sequence similarity. To address these challenges, we developed gAIRR-wgs, for WGS-based TR allele typing. By incorporating novel alleles from HPRC individuals, gAIRR-wgs exhibited excellent performance in allele calling, with F1 scores of 100.0% for TR_D, 99.8% for TR_J, and 98.3% for TR_V. Applying this pipeline to 1,492 individuals from the Taiwan Biobank (TWB), we identified 449 novel TR alleles, 277 of which overlapped with HPRC release 1 data of mixed ethnicity and are absent in the IMGT database. Further population comparison analysis revealed significant TR allele distribution differences across global populations, showing population-specific patterns and diversity variations between ethnic groups. We also discovered TWB-specific deletion polymorphisms affecting contiguous TRGV and TRBV genes, which are not recorded in the gnomAD database and undetected by standard structural variant callers, highlighting the need for tailored approaches to resolve complex immune gene regions. In conclusion, gAIRR-wgs enables accurate TR allele calling from standard WGS data using feasible computational resources and reveals substantial immunogenetic diversity in population cohorts.

bioinformatics↗

TypeAssembly: Copy number estimation and allele typing for haplotype assemblies

Accurately annotating complex genes in the human genome, particularly from haplotype assemblies, remains a significant challenge. To overcome this, we developed TypeAssembly, a local alignment-based framework for copy number estimation and allele typing. Operating in two modes, mode-FASTA and mode-VCF, TypeAssembly can define alleles by either sequence or variant information. We successfully applied it to annotate 41 genes in the MHC locus, 17 KIR genes, and, for the first time, 15 pharmacogenes across 466 haplotype assemblies. This study establishes TypeAssembly as a robust method for accurately annotating complex genomic regions and provides an evaluation of existing gene annotations and callers.

bioinformatics↗

Unmasking Human T Cell Receptor Germline Diversity: 335 Novel Alleles Identified in 47 Pangenome Reference Individuals Using the gAIRR Suite

The adaptive immune receptor repertoire (AIRR), composed of V(D)J-recombined T cell receptors (TR) and immunoglobulins (IG), is central to adaptive immunity. Accurate AIRR profiling depends on a comprehensive and diverse germline gene set encoding AIRR (gAIRR). Furthermore, gAIRR alleles themselves are associated with immune-related phenotypes and diseases. However, for TR genes, the IMGT database - the primary gAIRR reference - has not been updated since 2020 and lacks sufficient population diversity and complete flanking sequences. To address these limitations, we investigated 47 high-quality genomes from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium (HPRC) using the gAIRR Suite and identified 335 novel TR alleles - 305 TRV and 30 TRJ - representing 91.6% and 30.9% increases over IMGT records. All novel alleles were crosschecked using two orthogonal pipelines. We also established a comprehensive flanking sequence database, including recombination signal sequences (RSS). We have made all resources publicly available to support immunogenomics research and clinical applications.

genomics↗

Toward Automatic Variant Interpretation: Discordant Genetic Interpretation Across Variant Annotations for ClinVar Pathogenic Variants

PurposeHigh-throughput sequencing has revolutionized genetic disorder diagnosis, but variant pathogenicity interpretation is still challenging. Even though the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) provides recommendations for variant nomenclature, discrepancies in annotation remain a significant hurdle. MethodsThis study evaluated the annotation concordance between three tools-- ANNOVAR, SnpEff, and Variant Effect Predictor (VEP)--using 164,549 two-star variants from ClinVar. The analysis used HGVS nomenclature string-match comparisons to assess annotation consistency from each tool, corresponding coding impacts, and associated ACMG criteria inferred from the annotations. ResultsThe analysis revealed variable concordance rates, with 58.52% agreement for HGVSc, 84.04% for HGVSp, and 85.58% for the coding impact. SnpEff showed the highest match for HGVSc (0.988), while VEP bettered for HGVSp (0.977). The substantial discrepancies were noted in the Loss-of-Function (LoF) category. Incorrect PVS1 interpretations affected the final pathogenicity and downgraded PLP variants (ANNOVAR 55.9%, SnpEff 66.5%, VEP 67.3%), risking false negatives of clinically relevant variants in reports. ConclusionsThese findings highlight the critical challenges in accurately interpreting variant pathogenicity due to discrepancies in annotations. To enhance the reliability of genetic variant interpretation in clinical practice, standardizing transcript sets and systematically cross-validating results across multiple annotation tools is essential. Graphic abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=120 SRC="FIGDIR/small/617756v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (24K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9f6378org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3b9a2corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@106fb58org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15f70c8_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG This study examined the consistency of variant annotations produced by three widely used open-source toolsANNOVAR, SnpEff, and VEPagainst 164,549 ClinVar two starts variants. The investigation covers HGVS-based transcript, protein nomenclature and coding impact annotation. The results showed that none of the tools were fully consistent with ClinVar across all coding impact categories, particularly in the LoF category, which exhibited the poorest consistency. This inconsistency may lead to discrepancies in PVS1 interpretation, affecting the final pathogenicity assessment. PVS1 loss resulted in a significant downgrading of PLP variants, potentially leading to the omission of clinically relevant variants in reports. C_FIG

genomics↗

Graph-KIR: Graph-based KIR Copy Number Estimation and Allele Calling Using Short-read Sequencing Data

MotivationThe Killer-cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptor (KIR) is a highly polymorphic region in the human genome, associated with autoimmune diseases and organ transplantation. The sequences of KIR genes are highly similar among star alleles as well as in between individual genes, with the copy number of each KIR gene typically ranging from 0 to 4. In this study, we introduce a tool Graph-KIR that aims to estimate the copy number of genes and to call full-resolution (7-digit) KIR alleles from a whole genome sequencing (WGS) sample. ResultsGraph-KIR, unlike most KIR tools, is capable of independently typing KIR alleles per sample with no reliance on the distribution of any framework gene in a cohort. In a set of 100 simulated samples, Graph-KIR demonstrated 100% accuracy in copy number estimation and high accuracy of allele typing: 91.2% at 7-digit resolution, 97.0% at 5-digit resolution, 97.2% at 3-digit resolution, and 99.6% at gene-level resolution. Graph-KIR outperforms existing tools such as PINGs WGS version (91.9% accuracy) and T1K (84.6% accuracy) at 5-digit resolution. By analyzing the results on 44 HPRC samples, Graph-KIR achieves an accuracy of 85.0%, better than PINGs WGS version (75.5% accuracy) at 5-digit resolution. The release of Graph-KIR adds another valuable tool to assist users in accurately estimating copy numbers and calling alleles of KIR genes from WGS samples, ensuring reliable performance. AvailabilityThe Graph-KIR and paper-related pipeline codes are available at https://github.com/linnil1/KIR_graph.

bioinformatics↗

Genetic Diversity and Structural Complexity of the Killer-Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor Gene Complex: A Comprehensive Analysis using Human Pangenome Assemblies

The killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) gene complex, a highly polymorphic region of the human genome that encodes proteins involved in immune responses, poses strong challenges in genotyping due to its remarkable genetic diversity and structural intricacy. Accurate analysis of KIR alleles, including their structural variations, is crucial for understanding their roles in various immune responses. Leveraging the high-quality genome assemblies from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium (HPRC), we present a novel bioinformatic tool, the Structural KIR annoTator (SKIRT), to investigate gene diversity and facilitate precise KIR allele analysis. We applied SKIRT on 47 HPRC-phased assemblies and identified a recurrent novel KIR2DS4/3DL1 fusion gene in the paternal haplotype of HG02630 and maternal haplotype of NA19240. Additionally, SKIRT accurately identifies eight structural variants and 17 novel nonsynonymous alleles, all of which were independently validated using short-read data or quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Our study has discovered a total of 570 novel alleles, among which eight haplotypes harbor at least one KIR gene duplication, six haplotypes have lost at least one framework gene, and 75 out of 94 haplotypes (79.8%) carry at least five novel alleles, thus confirming KIR genetic diversity. These findings are pivotal in providing insights into KIR gene diversity and serve as a solid foundation for understanding the functional consequences of KIR structural variations. High-resolution genome assemblies offer unprecedented opportunities to explore polymorphic regions that are challenging to investigate using short-read sequencing methods. The SKIRT pipeline emerges as a highly efficient tool, enabling the comprehensive detection of the complete spectrum of KIR alleles within human genome assemblies.

genomics↗

Somatic mutation detection workflow validity distinctly influences clinical decision.

Evaluating robustness of somatic mutation detections is essential when utilizing whole exome sequencing (WES) for treatment decision-making. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted using tumor WES from the FDA-led Sequencing Quality Control Phase 2 (SEQC2) project, in which multiple library kits sequenced identical DNA materials across three labs to benchmark analytical validity. These workflows included various read aligner (BWA, Bowtie2, DRAGEN-Aligner, DRAGMAP, and HISAT2) and mutation caller (Mutect2, TNscope, DRAGEN-Caller, and DeepVariant) combinations. The results revealed that DRAGEN exhibited superior performance, achieving mean F1-scores of 0.966 and 0.791 for SNV and INDEL detection, respectively. Among open-source software, BWA Mutect2 and HISAT2 Mutect2 combinations showed the highest mean F1-scores for SNV (0.949) and IN-DEL (0.722), respectively. The analyses indicated that high-quality data can be analyzed as having worse results, and vice versa. Evaluations of COSMIC reported mutations unveiled discrepancies across enrichment kits. IDT enrichment kits showed a higher false negative rate, while Agilent WES kits tended to miss mutations in CBL and IDH1, and Roche library kits tended to miss the mutations in PIK3CB. For drug-related biomarkers, Sentieon TNscope tended to underestimate tumor mutation burden and overlook crucial drug-resistance mutations such as FLT3 (c.G1879A: p.A627T) for cytarabine resistance in leukemia and MAP2K1 (c.G199A:p.D67N) for BRAF inhibitors in melanoma. The findings highlight the importance of robust bioinformatic analysis in identifying tumor mutations and guiding clinical decision-making. HighlightsO_LIMutation callers had a significantly higher effect on overall sensitivity than aligners. C_LIO_LIBenchmarking analyses demonstrated that high-quality sequencing reads can be analyzed as having worse results, and vice versa. C_LIO_LIDRAGEN exhibited the best performance among other aligner-caller combinations. C_LIO_LIThe combination of BWA with Mutect2 and HISAT2 with Mutect2 yielded the highest mean F1 scores for detecting SNVs and INDELs by open-source software, respectively. C_LIO_LISentieon TNscope tended to underestimate the tumor mutation burden and missed several drug-resistant mutations. C_LI

bioinformatics↗

Evaluating the analytical validity of mutation calling pipeline for tumor whole exome sequencing

Detecting somatic mutations from the patients tumor tissues has the clinical impacts in medical decision making. Library preparation methods, sequencing platforms, read alignment tools and variant calling algorithms are the major factors to influence the data analysis results. Understanding the performance of the tool combinations of the somatic variant calling pipelines has become an important issue in the use of the whole exome sequences (WES) analysis in clinical actions. In this study, we selected four state-of-the-art sequence aligners including BWA, Bowtie2, DRAGMAP, DRAGEN aligner (DragenA) and HISAT2. For the variant callers, we chose GATK Mutect2, Sentieon TNscope, DRAGEN caller (DragenC) and DeepVariant. The benchmarking tumor whole exome sequencing data released from the FDA-led Sequencing and Quality Control Phase 2 (SEQC2) consortium was applied as the true positive variants to evaluate the overall performance. Multiple combinations of the aligners and variant callers were used to assess the variation detection capability. We measured the recall, precision and F1-score for each combination in both single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short insertions and deletions (InDels) variant detections. We also evaluated their performances in different variant allele frequencies (VAFs) and the base pair length. The results showed that the top recall, precision and F1-score in the SNVs detection were generated by the combinations of BWA+DragenC(0.9629), Bowtie2+TNscope(0.9957) and DRAGMAP+DragenC(0.9646), respectively. In the InDels detection, BWA+DragenC(0.9546), Hisat2+TNscope(0.7519) and DragenA+DragenC(0.8081) outperformed the other combinations in the recall, precision and F1-Score, respectively. In addition, we found that the variant callers could bias the variant calling results. Finally, although some combinations yielded high accuracies of variant detection, but some variants still could not be detected by these outperformed combinations. The results of this study provided the vital information that no single combination could achieve superior results in detecting all the variants of the benchmarking dataset. In conclusion, applying both merged-based and ensemble-based variants detection approaches is encouraged to further detect variants comprehensively.

bioinformatics↗

Profiling Germline Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoire with gAIRR Suite

Genetic profiling of germline adaptive immune receptor repertoire (AIRR), including T cell receptor (TR) and immunoglobulin (IG), is imaginably relevant to numerous immune-related conditions, but currently insurmountable due to high genetic complexity. Our gAIRR Suite comprises three modules. gAIRR-seq, a probe capture-based targeted sequencing pipeline, profiles AIRR from individual DNA samples. gAIRR-call and gAIRR-annotate call alleles from gAIRR-seq reads and annotate whole-genome assemblies respectively. We gAIRR-seqed TRV and TRJ of seven Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) DNA samples with 100% accuracy, and discovered novel alleles. We also gAIRR-seqed and gAIRR-called a subject from both the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and oral mucosal cells. The calling results from these two cell types have a high concordance (99% for all known AIRR alleles). We gAIRR-annotated 36 genomes to cumulatively unearth 325 novel TRV alleles and 29 novel TRJ alleles. We could further profile the flanking sequences, including the recombination signal sequence (RSS). We validated two structural variants for HG002. We uncovered substantial conflicts of AIRR genes in references GRCh37 and GRCh38. The gAIRR Suite can potentially benefit future genetic study and clinical applications of various immune-related phenotypes.

genomics↗

variant2literature: full text literature search for genetic variants

MotivationWhole genome sequencing (WGS) by next-generation sequencing produces millions of variants for an individual. The retrieval of biomedical literature for such a large number of genetic variants remains challenging, because in many cases the variants are only present in tables as images, or in the supplementary documents of which the file formats are diverse.\n\nResultsThe proposed tool named variant2literature from the TaiGenomics (Toolkits for AI genomics) resolves the problem by incorporating text recognition with image processing. In addition to the adoption of advanced image-based text retrieval, the recall rate of finding the literature containing the variants of interest is further improved by employing the skill of variant normalization. Different variant presentations are transformed into chromosome coordinates (standard VCF format) such that false negatives can be largely avoided. variant2literature is available in two ways. First, a web-based interface is provided to search all the literature in PMC Open Access Subset. Second, the command-line executable can be downloaded such that the users are free to search all the files in a specified directory locally.\n\nAvailabilityhttp://variant2literature.taigenomics.com/\n\nContactchienyuchen@ntu.edu.tw

genetics↗