bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Houdijk, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Houdijk, H..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Quadriceps-hamstrings muscle co-activation during the swing phase of walking is modulated by task constraints in healthy adults

BackgroundMuscle co-activation, the simultaneous activation of muscles or muscle groups, is a common strategy to enhance the stability of the musculoskeletal system. However, co-activation can also be the consequence of underlying neurological impairments. To better understand and discern functional co-activation during walking, this study explored the difference in quadriceps-hamstrings co-activation during the swing phase of walking and an isolated leg-swinging movement in healthy adults. MethodsTwelve healthy young adults performed walking and isolated leg-swinging at slow (0.6 m/s) and comfortable speed. Isolated leg-swinging was frequency and amplitude matched to the walk conditions. Electromyography signals from m. vastus lateralis, m. rectus femoris, m. biceps femoris, and m. semitendinosus were recorded. Pearson correlation coefficient (Pearson-CI) was calculated as a measure of rate of co-activation. Area under the curve (AUC-CI) was calculated as a measure of co-activation magnitude. Co-activation indices were calculated for both metric across the four muscle pairs and averaged into a single quadriceps-hamstrings CI for each metric. ResultsThe results showed a higher Pearson-CI, but not AUC-CI, during walking compared to isolated leg-swinging, specifically during mid- and terminal-swing at both speeds. AUC-CI, but not Pearson-CI, was significantly higher during slow speed, compared to comfortable speed. ConclusionQuadriceps-hamstrings co-activation towards the end of the swing phase during walking reflects preparation for heel-strike, which is not present in isolated leg-swinging. Therefore, an isolated leg-swinging task could serve as a feasible method to distinguish pathological from functional muscle co-activation during walking.

neuroscience↗

The effect of external lateral stabilization on energy cost of walking - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous studies have estimated the energy cost required for the control of medio-lateral stability in human walking by means of external lateral stabilization. Results were inconsistent, possibly due to differences in task constraints or stabilization devices. To better understand the effects of lateral stabilization on energy cost, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies, which directly assessed effects of lateral stabilization on energy cost in healthy young adult participants (18-41 years old). We obtained individual participant data on net energy cost (J kg-1 m-1) from previously published studies. Across all studies reviewed, the net energy cost reduction during stabilized walking at preferred and zero step widths equaled to 0.05 {+/-} 0.35 (~2-3% reduction) and 0.25 {+/-} 0.29 J kg-1 m-1 (mean {+/-} s.d.) (~8-9% reduction), respectively. The effect of external lateral stabilization was significant only for walking at zero step width and without arm swing. Lateral stabilization devices with short rope length increased energy cost reduction. However, spring stiffness and habituation time did not influence energy cost reduction. We provide recommendations for improvement of lateral stabilization devices to avoid some of the confounding effects. External lateral stabilization reduces energy cost during walking by a small amount. It can be concluded that a small proportion of total energy cost is required to control medio-lateral stability; this proportion is larger when walking with narrow steps and without arm swing.

physiology↗

How does external lateral stabilization constrain normal gait, apart from improving medio-lateral gait stability?

BackgroundThe effect of external lateral stabilization on medio-lateral gait stability has been investigated previously. However, existing lateral stabilization devices not only constrains lateral motions, but also transverse and frontal pelvis rotations. This study aimed to investigate the effect of external lateral stabilization with and without constrained transverse pelvis rotation on mechanical and metabolic gait features. MethodsWe undertook 2 experiments with eleven and ten young adult subjects, respectively. Experiment 2 supplemented experiment 1, as it considered several potential confounding factors in the design and set-up of experiment 1. Kinematic, kinetic, and breath-by-breath oxygen consumption data were recorded during 3 walking conditions (normal walking (Normal), lateral stabilization with (Free) and without transverse pelvis rotation (Restricted)) and at 3 speeds (0.83, 1.25, and 1.66 m/s) for each condition. ResultsExternal lateral stabilization significantly reduced the amplitudes of the transverse and frontal pelvis rotations, medio-lateral pelvis displacement, transverse thorax rotation, arm swing, and step width. The amplitudes of free vertical moment, anterior-posterior and vertical pelvis displacements, step length, and energy cost were not significantly influenced by external lateral stabilization. The removal of transverse pelvis rotation restriction by our experimental set-up resulted in significantly higher transverse pelvis rotation, although it remained significantly less than Normal condition. In concert, concomitant gait features such as transverse thorax rotation and arm swing were not significantly influenced by our new set-up. ConclusionExisting lateral stabilization set-ups not only constrain medio-lateral motions (i.e. medio-lateral pelvis displacement), but also constrains other movements such as transverse and frontal pelvis rotations, which leads to several other gait changes such as reduced transverse thorax rotation, and arm swing. Our new setup allowed for more transverse pelvis rotation, however, this did not result in more normal pelvis rotation, arm swing, etc. Hence, to provide medio-lateral support without constraining other gait variables, more elaborate set-ups are needed. Unless such a set-up is realized the observed side effects need to be taken into account when interpreting the effects of lateral stabilization as reported in previous studies.

bioengineering↗

Influence of Arm Swing on Cost of Transport during Walking

Normal arm swing plays a role in decreasing the cost of transport during walking. However, whether excessive arm swing can reduce the cost of transport even further is unknown. Therefore, we tested the effects of normal and exaggerated arm swing on the cost of transport in the current study. Healthy participants (n=12) walked on a treadmill (1.25 m/s) in seven trials with different arm swing amplitudes (in-phase, passive restricted, active restricted, normal, three gradations of extra arm swing), while metabolic energy cost and the vertical angular momentum (VAM) and ground reaction moment (GRM) were measured.\n\nIn general, VAM and GRM decreased as arm swing amplitude was increased, except for in the largest arm swing amplitude condition. The decreases in VAM and GRM were accompanied by a decrease in cost of transport from in-phase walking (negative amplitude) up to a slightly increased arm swing (non-significant difference compared to normal arm swing). The most excessive arm swings led to an increase in the cost of transport, most likely due to the cost of swinging the arms. In conclusion, increasing arm swing amplitude leads to a reduction in vertical angular moment and ground reaction moments, but it does not lead to a reduction in cost of transport for the most excessive arm swing amplitudes. Normal or slightly increased arm swing amplitude appears to be optimal in terms of cost of transport in young and healthy individuals.\n\nSUMMARY STATEMENTExcessive arm swing reduces the vertical angular momentum and ground reaction moment, but not necessarily the energetic cost of transport.

neuroscience↗