bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Houborg, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Houborg, C..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

How we draw and recognize things that don't exist

How do we make sense of something weve never seen before? Classifying objects into superordinate classes like animal is a key step in interpreting novel experiences, but is challenging because radically different items (e.g., octopus, rabbit) must somehow be grouped together. In general, no single feature is shared by all members. We reasoned that to classify or imagine novel items from outside the distribution of previous experiences, observers parse objects into meaningful component features that they can mentally recombine ( compositionality). To test this, we asked participants to draw familiar and novel members of nine superordinate object classes. We then asked other participants to classify the drawings, and mark and label their defining parts. We find that human classification performance is well predicted by a Bayesian classifier that optimally combines the part labels, suggesting humans can create and classify out-of-distribution experiences through a compositional generative representation of object features.

neuroscience↗

Brief temporal perturbations in somatosensory reafference disrupt perceptual and neural attenuation and increase supplementary motor-cerebellar connectivity

Intrinsic delays in sensory feedback can be detrimental for motor control. As a compensation strategy, the brain predicts the sensory consequences of movement via a forward model on the basis of a copy of the motor command. Using these predictions, the brain attenuates the somatosensory reafference to facilitate the processing of exafferent information. Theoretically, this predictive attenuation gets disrupted by (even minimal) temporal errors between the predicted and the actual reafference, but direct evidence for such disruption is lacking since previous neuroimaging studies contrasted conditions of nondelayed reafferent input with exafferent one. Here, we combined psychophysics with functional magnetic resonance imaging to test whether subtle perturbations in the timing of somatosensory reafference disrupt its predictive processing. Twenty-eight participants generated touches on their left index finger by tapping a sensor with their right index finger. The touches on the left index finger were delivered at the time of the two fingers contact or with a 100 ms delay. We found that such brief temporal perturbations disrupted the attenuation of the somatosensory reafference both at the perceptual and neural level, leading to greater somatosensory and cerebellar responses and weaker somatosensory connectivity with the cerebellum proportionally to perceptual changes. Moreover, we observed increased connectivity of the supplementary motor area with the cerebellum during the perturbations. We interpret these effects as the failure of the forward model to predictively attenuate the delayed somatosensory reafference and the return of the prediction error to the motor centers, respectively. Significance statementOur brain receives the somatosensory feedback of our movements with delay. To counteract these delays, motor control theories postulate that the brain predicts the timing of the somatosensory consequences of our movements and attenuates sensations received at that timing. This makes a self-generated touch feel weaker than an identical external touch. However, how subtle temporal errors between the predicted and the actual somatosensory feedback perturb this predictive attenuation remains unknown. We show that such errors make the otherwise attenuated touch feel stronger, elicit stronger somatosensory responses, weaken the cerebellar connectivity with somatosensory areas, and increase it with motor areas. These findings show that motor and cerebellar areas are fundamental in forming temporal predictions about the sensory consequences of our movements.

neuroscience↗

Rapid learning and unlearning of predicted sensory delays in self-generated touch

Self-generated touch feels less intense and less ticklish than identical externally generated touch. This somatosensory attenuation occurs because the brain predicts the tactile consequences of our self-generated movements. To produce attenuation, the tactile predictions need to be time-locked to the movement, but how the brain maintains this temporal tuning remains unknown. Using a bimanual self-touch paradigm, we demonstrate that people can rapidly unlearn to attenuate touch immediately after their movement and learn to attenuate delayed touch instead, after repeated exposure to a systematic delay between the movement and the resulting touch. The magnitudes of the unlearning and learning effects are correlated and dependent on the number of trials that participants have been exposed to. We further show that delayed touches feel less ticklish and non-delayed touches more ticklish after exposure to the systematic delay. These findings demonstrate that the attenuation of self-generated touch is adaptive.

neuroscience↗