bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hormuth, D. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Hormuth, D. A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Estimating glioblastoma migration-to-proliferation ratio from single time-point MRI data via radial density distribution

Glioblastoma (GBM) tumors with a high migration-to-proliferation ratio (D/k) are associated with treatment resistance, motivating the estimation of D/k from routine pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and the investigation of mechanisms underlying its heterogeneity across patients. Unlike previous approaches based on nested spherical approximations of enhancing and non-enhancing tumor volumes, we incorporate the spatial arrangement of the enhancing and non-enhancing tumor regions by deriving a 1D tumor density distribution from their segmentations and fitting a 1D reaction-diffusion model to estimate D/k. We achieved an error of under 5% when comparing our method to synthetic density distributions and found excellent correlation with synthetic tumor segmentations (Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) = 0.996). We then evaluated associations between patient-specific D/k values and their clinical, transcriptomic, and radiomic features. When applied to 102 pre-treatment MRI scans from the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) 2017 dataset, elevated D/k significantly correlated with reduced overall survival (log-rank p = 0.01), older age (p = 0.04), and a trend toward lower Karnofsky Performance Status (p = 0.059). In a subset of 91 patients with available microarray data, mesenchymal-like phenotypes consistently exhibited elevated D/k across three established molecular subtype classifications (p = 0.013, p = 0.055, and p = 0.127). Elastic Net regularization followed by overrepresentation analysis revealed an enrichment of glycosylation-related pathways among genes associated with D/k variability (p = 0.0123 and p = 0.0368). Furthermore, Multi-Omic Factor Analysis identified a radiomic factor correlated with D/k (r = 0.57, p = 4x10-9), with the highest-weighted features corresponding to smoothness of the non-enhancing tumor region on T2 and FLAIR.

systems biology↗

75 Years of Mathematical Oncology

Constructing a comprehensive overview of any scientific field requires accurate literature selection, yet conventional keyword-based searches are susceptible to false positives. This problem is magnified in growing or interdisciplinary fields such as mathematical modeling in oncology that contain a rich but heterogeneous body of literature. Here, a generalizable, context-enriched artificial intelligence pipeline based on large language models (LLMs) curates large scientific corpora according to a user-defined field: mathematical modeling in oncology (>35k publications). Benchmarking against expert evaluation demonstrates high accuracy (ROC AUC[~]0.95) and agreement with human judgement (correlation[~]0.68), outperforming zero-shot LLM curation Analysis of the curated corpus ([~]14k) suggests that Mathematical Oncology s distinct from either Systems Biology and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics despite employing overlapping methods. Co-occurring citation network analysis defines nine research clusters focused on a range of applications including drug delivery, optimal control, stochastic modeling, tumor microenvironment, radiation, cancer evolution, and spatial multiscale modeling. Significance StatementA generalizable, context-enriched artificial intelligence pipeline accurately curates large scientific corpora Analysis of the curated dataset applied to the se of mathematics n oncology provides comprehensive view of mathematical modeling in oncology across 140 years, revealing its shift from fundamental cancer biology towards therapeutic modelling.

cancer biology↗

PhysiCOOL: A generalized framework for model Calibration and Optimization Of modeLing projects

In silico models of biological systems are usually very complex and rely on several parameters describing physical and biological properties that require validation. As such, parameter space exploration is an essential component of computational model development to fully characterize and validate simulation results. Experimental data may also be used to constrain parameter space (or enable model calibration) to enhance the biological relevance of model parameters. One widely used computational platform in the mathematical biology community is PhysiCell which provides a standardized approach to agent-based models of biological phenomena at different time and spatial scales. Nonetheless, one limitation of PhysiCell is that there has not been a generalized approach for parameter space exploration and calibration that can be run without high-performance computing access. Taking this into account, we present PhysiCOOL, an open-source Python library tailored to create standardized calibration and optimization routines of PhysiCell models. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=96 SRC="FIGDIR/small/516671v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (31K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16d2601org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@da335dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1623bd3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@45d9f4_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

bioengineering↗

An experimental-mathematical approach to predict tumor cell growth as a function of glucose availability in breast cancer cell lines

We present the development and validation of a mathematical model that predicts how glucose dynamics influence metabolism and therefore tumor cell growth. Glucose, the starting material for glycolysis, has a fundamental influence on tumor cell growth. We employed time-resolved microscopy to track the temporal change of the number of live and dead tumor cells under different initial glucose concentrations and seeding densities. We then constructed a family of mathematical models (where cell death was accounted for differently in each member of the family) to describe overall tumor cell growth in response to the initial glucose and confluence conditions. The Akaikie Information Criteria was then employed to identify the most parsimonious model. The selected model was then trained on 75% of the data to calibrate the system and identify trends in model parameters as a function of initial glucose concentration and confluence. The calibrated parameters were applied to the remaining 25% of the data to predict the temporal dynamics given the known initial glucose concentration and confluence, and tested against the corresponding experimental measurements. With the selected model, we achieved an accuracy (defined as the fraction of measured data that fell within the 95% confidence intervals of the predicted growth curves) of 77.2 {+/-} 6.3% and 87.2 {+/-} 5.1% for live BT-474 and MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively.

cancer biology↗