bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hof, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Hof, F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Efficacy and safety evaluation of artificial intelligence-identified antimicrobial peptides for use against avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in the poultry industry

The overuse of antibiotics in both veterinary and human medicine has resulted in the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, prompting a search for effective alternatives. Antimicrobial peptides (AMP) are short, often cationic, peptide-based molecules with antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activity, which makes them promising alternatives to conventional antibiotics in poultry production. From a prior machine-learning-guided screen of 875 candidate AMPs, 62 exhibited activity against avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) and low in vitro hemolytic and cytotoxic activity. We selected three lead AMPs from this list (named TeRu4, TeBi1, and PeNi4), and evaluated their in vitro and in vivo efficacy, safety, and immunomodulatory potential for use in poultry farming. In animal experiments, AMPs were administered via in ovo injection on day 18 of embryonic development. In APEC challenge trials, yolk sacs were inoculated with APEC post-hatch to assess early chick mortality, while in pen trials, birds were raised in a commercial production setting for 35 days. For challenged birds, TeBi1 (10 g/egg) significantly reduced bacterial detection in the air sac and pericardium, increased body weight by 50% and reduced cytokine transcript levels by 10-30% on day 7 post hatch. In HD11 chicken macrophage-like cultured cells, TeRu4 (16 g/mL) suppressed lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine transcript levels. In pen trials, TeRu4 (20 g/egg) increased the survival probability of female birds by 4.9%, while TeBi1 (20 g/egg) increased the survival probability of all birds by 4.4%, by day 35. Gene expression analysis revealed AMP- and sex-specific cytokine responses. In pen trials, no significant differences were observed in mean weights, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and flock uniformity on day 35. These findings demonstrate that the three selected AMPs are safe antibiotic alternatives that improve survival, modulate immune responses, and maintain normal growth performance in broiler chickens.

microbiology↗

A structural competition involving WDR5 times circadian oscillations

In the mammalian circadian clock, the transcription factor BMAL1/CLOCK cycles between an active state recruiting co-activators like MLL1, and repressed states associated with the clock proteins Period1/2 (PER1/2) and Cryptochrome1/2 (CRY1/2). The MLL1 complex component WDR5 was also found in a repressive PER complex, but the roles of WDR5-PER interactions are unknown. Here we show that WDR5 directly binds to the C-terminal CRY binding domain (CBD) regions of PER1 and PER2. PER2 binds WDR5 via a WDR5 binding (WBM) motif within the PER2/CRY interface, imposing a molecular choice between PER2/WDR5- and PER2/CRY complexes. PER1 predominantly binds WDR5 via a WDR5 interacting (WIN) motif outside the CBD and exhibits a 15-fold higher WDR5 affinity than PER2. Thereby PER1 can form trimeric PER1WIN/WDR5/RbBP5WBM - and PER1/WDR5/CRY complexes as potential transition states between activating MLL1WIN/WDR5/RbBP5WBM - and repressive PER/CRY complexes. Overexpressing WDR5 in mammalian cells increases the circadian amplitude, whereas a compound targeting the WIN motif binding site of WDR5 weakens PER1-WDR5 interactions and shortens the circadian oscillation period by 2 to 3 hours. Together, our studies uncover WDR5 as direct PER interaction partner at the interface between active- and repressed states of BMAL1/CLOCK and suggest a functional role of WDR5 and its WIN site interactions in the mammalian clock by both enhancing circadian oscillations and creating a temporal delay.

biochemistry↗