Hodges, T. E. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2022

Sex and age differences in cognitive bias and neural activation in response to cognitive bias

Cognitive symptoms of depression, including negative cognitive bias, are more severe in women than in men. Current treatments to reduce negative cognitive bias are not effective and sex differences in the neural activity underlying cognitive bias may play a role. Here we examined sex and age differences in cognitive bias and functional connectivity in a novel paradigm. Male and female rats underwent an 18-day cognitive bias procedure, in which they learned to discriminate between two contexts (shock paired context A, no-shock paired context B), during either adolescence (postnatal day (PD 40)), young adulthood (PD 100), or middle-age (PD 210). Cognitive bias was measured as freezing behaviour in response to an ambiguous context (context C), with freezing levels akin to the shock paired context coded as negative bias. All animals learned to discriminate between the two contexts, regardless of sex or age. However, adults (young adults, middle-aged) displayed a greater negative cognitive bias compared to adolescents, and middle-aged males had a greater negative cognitive bias than middle-aged females. Females had greater neural activation of the nucleus accumbens, amygdala, and hippocampal regions to the ambiguous context compared to males, and young rats (adolescent, young adults) had greater neural activation in these regions compared to middle-aged rats. Functional connectivity between regions involved in cognitive bias differed by age and sex, and only adult males had negative correlations between the frontal regions and hippocampal regions. These findings highlight the importance of examining age and sex when investigating the underpinnings of negative cognitive bias and lay the groundwork for determining what age- and sex-specific regions to target in future cognitive bias studies. HighlightsO_LIMiddle-aged males had a greater negative cognitive bias than middle-aged females C_LIO_LIAdult rats displayed a greater negative cognitive bias compared to adolescents C_LIO_LIGreater neural activity in females than males in limbic and reward regions C_LIO_LIGreater role of the frontal cortex activation in the cognitive bias of adults C_LIO_LIFunctional connectivity in response to cognitive bias differed by age and sex C_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Harnessing the Power of Sex Differences: What a Difference Ten Years Did Not Make

Sex differences exist in many neurological and psychiatric diseases. Mandates have been initiated across funding agencies for research to include males and females. What has been lacking in the literature is a detailed assessment of how sex is incorporated into the design (e.g. balanced design) and into the analyses (e.g. covariate). We surveyed papers in 2009 and 2019 across six journals in Neuroscience and Psychiatry. There was a 30% increase in the percentage of papers that included both sexes to 68% in 2019. Despite this increase, in 2019 only 19% of studies used an optimal design for discovery of possible sex differences and only 5% analyzed sex as a discovery variable. Here we show that little progress has been made in harnessing the power that sex differences can afford in research for discovery and therapeutic potential for neurological and psychiatric disease to improve the health of men, women and gender diverse individuals. Highlights68% of Neuroscience and Psychiatry papers reported the use of both sexes in 2019 Only 19% of studies in 2019 used sex consistently throughout the study analyses Of the studies that used males and females, 59% did not include sex in the analyses Only 5% of studies in 2019 used sex as a discovery variable in their analyses Male only papers were 8.4 times more prevalent than female-only papers

neuroscience↗