bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Hodges, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Hodges, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A comprehensive assessment of benign genetic variability for neurodegenerative disorders

1AbstractOver the last few years, as more and more sequencing studies have been performed, it has become apparent that the identification of pathogenic mutations is, more often than not, a complex issue. Here, with a focus on neurodegenerative diseases, we have performed a survey of coding genetic variability that is unlikely to be pathogenic.\n\nWe have performed whole-exome sequencing in 478 samples derived from several brain banks in the United Kingdom and the United States of America. Samples were included when subjects were, at death, over 60 years of age, had no signs of neurological disease and were subjected to a neuropathological examination, which revealed no evidence of neurodegeneration. This information will be valuable to studies of genetic variability as a causal factor for neurodegenerative syndromes. We envisage it will be particularly relevant for diagnostic laboratories as a filter step to the results being produced by either genome-wide or gene-panel sequencing. We have made this data publicly available at www.alzforum.org/exomes/hex.

genomics

Does genetic risk help to predict amyloid burden in a non-demented population? A Bayesian approach.

INTRODUCTIONIn this study we investigate the association between A{beta} levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and genetic risk in a non-demented population. This paper presents the first analysis to use a Bayesian methodology in this area.\n\nMETHODSData from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and the EDAR* and DESCRIPA** studies was used in a Bayesian logistic regression analysis. We modeled CSF A{beta} burden using age, diagnosis (healthy control or mild cognitive impairment), APOE and a polygenic risk score (PGRS) associated with Alzheimers Disease (AD). We compared models built using informative priors on age, diagnosis and APOE with non-informative priors on all variables.\n\nRESULTSThe use of informative priors did not improve model performance in the majority of cases. Models using only age, diagnosis and APOE genotype showed the best predictive ability.\n\nDISCUSSIONA previous study indicated that a PGRS of AD case/control status was associated with CSF A{beta} burden in healthy controls. The current study suggests that this association does not lead to models that are more predictive of amyloid positivity than already known factors such as age and APOE.\n\n* Beta amyloid oligomers in the early diagnosis of AD and as marker for treatment response\n\n** Development of screening guidelines and criteria for pre-dementia Alzheimers disease

bioinformatics