Biology subjects

Hiraga, S.-i.

Publications and source records attributed to Hiraga, S.-i..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Cohesin–axis interaction via a conserved Red1 motif promotes domain-specific DSB formation and Mek1 activation

Faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis I requires tight control of interhomolog recombination. In budding yeast, the meiotic chromosome axis, built on Rec8-containing cohesin together with Red1 and Hop1, acts as a central platform regulating meiotic recombination from programmed DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation to checkpoint signaling and chromosome segregation, yet how cohesin recruits axis proteins remains unclear. Here, we identified a conserved cohesin-interacting motif (CIM) in Red1 that directly binds Rec8. AlphaFold3 modeling predicted that Red1-CIM forms a short -helix that docks into a conserved hydrophobic pocket within the Rec8 C-terminal winged-helix domain, which we confirmed biochemically. Disruption of the Red1-CIM preferentially impaired Red1 recruitment to Rec8-dependent chromosomal regions, while relative enrichment in Rec8-independent domains was preserved, leading to reduced DSB formation in Rec8-dependent domains. The Red1-CIM mutation also reduced crossover formation, increased chromosome missegregation, and reduced spore viability. Notably, this spore lethality exceeded that predicted by the reduction in DSB formation. Consistently, red1-CIM mutants failed to activate the meiotic checkpoint kinase Mek1. Finally, we provide evolutionary, structural, and biochemical evidence that this Red1-Rec8 interaction is conserved across fungi and plants. Together, these findings define a direct molecular bridge linking cohesin to chromosome-axis organization, spatial DSB regulation, and checkpoint signaling during meiosis.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2021

SAF-A promotes origin licensing and replication fork progression to ensure robust DNA replication

The organisation of chromatin is closely intertwined with biological activities of chromosome domains, including transcription and DNA replication status. Scaffold attachment factor A (SAF-A), also known as Heteronuclear Ribonucleoprotein Protein U (HNRNPU), contributes to the formation of open chromatin structure. Here we demonstrate that SAF-A promotes the normal progression of DNA replication, and enables resumption of replication after inhibition. We report that cells depleted for SAF-A show reduced origin licensing in G1 phase, and consequently reduced origin activation frequency in S phase. Replication forks progress slowly in cells depleted for SAF-A, also contributing to reduced DNA synthesis rate. Single-cell replication timing analysis revealed that the boundaries between early- and late-replicating domains are blurred in cells depleted for SAF-A. Associated with these defects, SAF-A-depleted cells show elevated {gamma}H2A phosphorylation and tend to enter quiescence. Overall we find that SAF-A protein promotes robust DNA replication to ensure continuing cell proliferation.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Checkpoint phosphorylation sites on budding yeast Rif1 protect nascent DNA from degradation by Sgs1-Dna2

In budding yeast the Rif1 protein is important for protecting nascent DNA at blocked replication forks, but the mechanism has been unclear. Here we show that budding yeast Rif1 must interact with Protein Phosphatase 1 to protect nascent DNA. In the absence of Rif1, removal of either Dna2 or Sgs1 prevents nascent DNA degradation, implying that Rif1 protects nascent DNA by targeting Protein Phosphatase 1 to oppose degradation by the Sgs1-Dna2 nuclease-helicase complex. This functional role for Rif1 is conserved from yeast to human cells. Yeast Rif1 was previously identified as a target of phosphorylation by the Tel1/Mec1 checkpoint kinases, but the importance of this phosphorylation has been unclear. We find that nascent DNA protection depends on a cluster of Tel1/Mec1 consensus phosphorylation sites in the Rif1 protein sequence, indicating that the intra-S phase checkpoint acts to protect nascent DNA through Rif1 phosphorylation. Our observations uncover the pathway by which budding yeast Rif1 stabilises newly synthesised DNA, highlighting the crucial role Rif1 plays in maintaining genome stability from lower eukaryotes to humans. Author summaryGenome instability is a leading factor contributing to cancer. Maintaining efficient error-free replication of the genome is key to preventing genome instability. During DNA replication, replication forks can be stalled by external and intrinsic obstacles, leading to processing of nascent DNA ends to enable replication restart. However, the nascent DNA must be protected from excessive processing to prevent terminal fork arrest, which could potentially lead to more serious consequences including failure to replicate some genome sequences. Using a nascent DNA protection assay we have investigated the role of the budding yeast Rif1 protein at blocked replication forks. We find that Rif1 protects nascent DNA through a mechanism that appears conserved from yeast to humans. We show that budding yeast Rif1 protects nascent DNA by targeting Protein Phosphatase 1 activity to prevent degradation of nascent DNA by the Sgs1-Dna2 helicase-nuclease complex. Furthermore, we find that Rif1 phosphorylation by the checkpoint pathway during replication stress is crucial for this function. Our results indicate that the S phase checkpoint machinery acts by phosphorylating Rif1 to protect nascent DNA, providing important clues concerning the conserved role of Rif1 in regulating events when replication is challenged.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Replication timing maintains the global epigenetic state in human cells.

DNA is replicated in a defined temporal order termed the replication timing (RT) program. RT is spatially segregated in the nucleus with early/late replication corresponding to Hi-C A/B chromatin compartments, respectively. Early replication is also associated with active histone modifications and transcriptional permissiveness. However, the mechanistic interplay between RT, chromatin state, and genome compartmentalization is largely unknown. Here we report that RT is central to epigenome maintenance and compartmentalization in both human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and cancer cell line HCT116. Knockout (KO) of the conserved RT control factor RIF1, rather than causing discrete RT switches as previously suspected, lead to dramatically increased cell to cell heterogeneity of RT genome wide, despite RIF1s enrichment in late replicating chromatin. RIF1 KO hESCs have a nearly random RT program, unlike all prior RIF1 KO cells, including HCT116, which show localized alterations. Regions that retain RT, which are prevalent in HCT116 but rare in hESCs, consist of large H3K9me3 domains revealing two independent mechanisms of RT regulation that are used to different extents in different cell types. RIF1 KO results in a striking genome wide downregulation of H3K27ac peaks and enrichment of H3K9me3 at large domains that remain late replicating, while H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 are re-distributed genome wide in a cell type specific manner. These histone modification changes coincided with global reorganization of genome compartments, transcription changes and a genome wide strengthening of TAD structures. Inducible degradation of RIF1 revealed that disruption of RT is upstream of genome compartmentalization changes. Our findings demonstrate that disruption of RT leads to widespread epigenetic mis-regulation, supporting previously speculative models in which the timing of chromatin assembly at the replication fork plays a key role in maintaining the global epigenetic state, which in turn drives genome architecture.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2019

The RIF1-Long splice variant promotes G1 phase 53BP1 nuclear bodies to protect against replication stress

Human cells lacking RIF1 are highly sensitive to replication inhibitors, but the reasons for this sensitivity have been enigmatic. Here we show that RIF1 must be present both during replication stress and in the ensuing recovery period to promote cell survival. Of two isoforms produced by alternative splicing, we find that RIF1-Long alone can protect cells against replication inhibition, but RIF1-Short is incapable of mediating protection. Consistent with this isoform-specific role, RIF1-Long is required to promote the formation of the 53BP1 nuclear bodies that protect unrepaired damage sites in the G1 phase following replication stress. Overall, our observations show that RIF1 is needed at several cell cycle stages after replication insult, with the RIF1-Long isoform playing a specific role during the ensuing G1 phase in damage site protection.

molecular biology↗