Biology subjects

Herrgard, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Herrgard, M..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

An automated workflow for multi-omics screening of microbial model organisms

Multi-omics datasets are becoming of key importance to drive discovery in fundamental research as much as generating knowledge for applied biotechnology. However, the construction of such large datasets is usually time-consuming and expensive. Automation is needed to overcome these issues by streamlining workflows from sample generation to data analysis. Here, we describe the construction of a complex workflow for the generation of high-throughput microbial multi-omics datasets. The workflow comprises a custom-built platform for automated cultivation and sampling of microbes, sample preparation protocols, analytical methods for sample analysis and automated scripts for raw data processing. We demonstrate possibilities and limitations of such workflow in generating data for three biotechnologically relevant model organisms, namely Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Pseudomonas putida.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2020

SmartPeak automates targeted and quantitative metabolomics data processing

SmartPeak is an application that encapsulates advanced algorithms to enable fast, accurate, and automated processing of CE-, GC- and LC-MS(/MS) data, and HPLC data for targeted and semi-targeted metabolomics, lipidomics, and fluxomics experiments. HighlightsO_LINovel algorithms for retention time alignment, calibration curve fitting, and peak integration C_LIO_LIEnables reproducibility by reducing operator bias and ensuring high QC/QA C_LIO_LIAutomated pipeline for high throughput targeted and/or quantitative metabolomics, lipidomics, and fluxomics data processing from multiple analytical instruments C_LIO_LIManually curated data set of LC-MS/MS, GC-MS, and HPLC integrated peaks for further algorithm development and benchmarking C_LI

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2020

Benchmarking kinetic models of Escherichia coli metabolism

Predicting phenotype from genotype is the holy grail of quantitative systems biology. Kinetic models of metabolism are among the most mechanistically detailed tools for phenotype prediction. Kinetic models describe changes in metabolite concentrations as a function of enzyme concentration, reaction rates, and concentrations of metabolic effectors uniquely enabling integration of multiple omics data types in a unifying mechanistic framework. While development of such models for Escherichia coli has been going on for almost twenty years, multiple separate models have been established and systematic independent benchmarking studies have not been performed on the full set of models available. In this study we compared systematically all recently published kinetic models of the central carbon metabolism of Escherichia coli. We assess the ease of use of the models, their ability to include omics data as input, and the accuracy of prediction of central carbon metabolic flux phenotypes. We conclude that there is no clear winner among the models when considering the resulting tradeoffs in performance and applicability to various scenarios. This study can help to guide further development of kinetic models, and to demonstrate how to apply such models in real-world setting, ultimately enabling the design of efficient cell factories. Author summaryKinetic modeling is a promising method to predict cell metabolism. Such models provide mechanistic description of how concentrations of metabolites change in the cell as a function of time, cellular environment and the genotype of the cell. In the past years there have been several kinetic models published for various organisms. We want to assess how reliably models of Escherichia coli metabolism could predict cellular metabolic state upon genetic or environmental perturbations. We test selected models in the ways that represent common metabolic engineering practices including deletion and overexpression of genes. Our results suggest that all published models have tradeoffs and the model to use should be chosen depending on the specific application. We show in which cases users could expect the best performance from published models. Our benchmarking study should help users to make a better informed choice and also provides systematic training and testing dataset for model developers.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Adaptive laboratory evolution reveals general and specific chemical tolerance mechanisms and enhances biochemical production

Tolerance to high product concentrations is a major barrier to achieving economically viable processes for bio-based chemical production. Chemical tolerance mechanisms are often unknown, thus their rational design is not achievable. To reveal unknown tolerance mechanisms we used an automated platform to evolve Escherichia coli to grow in previously toxic concentrations of 11 chemicals that have applications as polymer precursors, chemical intermediates, or biofuels. Re-sequencing of isolates from 88 independently evolved populations, reconstruction of mutations, and cross-compound tolerance profiling was employed to uncover general and specific tolerance mechanisms. We found that: 1) the broad tolerance of strains towards chemicals varied significantly depending on the chemical stress condition under which the strain was evolved; 2) the strains that acquired high levels of NaCl tolerance also became broadly tolerant to most chemicals; 3) genetic tolerance mechanisms included alterations in regulatory, cell wall, transcriptional and translational functions, as well as more chemical-specific mechanisms related to transport and metabolism; 4) using pre-tolerized starting strains can significantly enhance subsequent production of chemicals when a production pathway is inserted; and 5) only a subset of the evolved isolates showed improved production indicating that this approach is especially useful when a large number of independently evolved isolates are screened for production. We provide a comprehensive genotype-phenotype map based on identified mutations and growth phenotypes for 224 chemical tolerant strains.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2018

A genome-scale metabolic model for Methylococcus capsulatus predicts reduced efficiency uphill electron transfer to pMMO.

BackgroundGenome-scale metabolic models allow researchers to calculate yields, to predict consumption and production rates, and to study the effect of genetic modifications in silico, without running resource-intensive experiments. While these models have become an invaluable tool for optimizing industrial production hosts like E. coli and S. cerevisiae, few such models exist for one-carbon (C1) metabolizers.\n\nResultsHere we present a genome-scale metabolic model for Methylococcus capsulatus, a well-studied obligate methanotroph, which has been used as a production strain of single cell protein (SCP). The model was manually curated, and spans a total of 877 metabolites connected via 898 reactions. The inclusion of 730 genes and comprehensive annotations, make this model not only a useful tool for modeling metabolic physiology, but also a centralized knowledge base for M. capsulatus. With it, we determined that oxidation of methane by the particulate methane monooxygenase is most likely driven through uphill electron transfer operating at reduced efficiency as this scenario matches best with experimental data from literature.\n\nConclusionsThe metabolic model will serve the ongoing fundamental research of C1 metabolism, and pave the way for rational strain design strategies towards improved SCP production processes in M. capsulatus.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Cameo: A Python Library for Computer Aided Metabolic Engineering and Optimization of Cell Factories

Computational systems biology methods enable rational design of cell factories on a genomescale and thus accelerate the engineering of cells for the production of valuable chemicals and proteins. Unfortunately, for the majority of these methods implementations are either not published, rely on proprietary software, or do not provide documented interfaces, which has precluded their mainstream adoption in the field. In this work we present cameo, a platform-independent software that enables in silico design of cell factories and targets both experienced modelers as well as users new to the field. It is written in Python and implements state-of-the-art methods for enumerating and prioritizing knock-out, knock-in, over-expression, and down-regulation strategies and combinations thereof. Cameo is an open source software project and is freely available under the Apache License 2.0. A dedicated website including documentation, examples, and installation instructions can be found at http://cameo.bio. Users can also give cameo a try at http://try.cameo.bio.

bioengineering↗