bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Henaut, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Henaut, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Viral interference between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and influenza A viruses

Some respiratory viruses can cause a viral interference through the activation of the interferon (IFN) pathway that reduces the replication of another virus. Epidemiological studies of coinfections between SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses have been hampered by non-pharmaceutical measures applied to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. With the ease of these interventions, SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A viruses can now co-circulate. It is thus of prime importance to characterize their interactions. In this work, we investigated viral interference effects between an Omicron variant and a contemporary influenza A/H3N2 strain, in comparison with an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 virus. We infected nasal human airway epitheliums with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza, either simultaneously or 24 h apart. Viral load was measured by RT-qPCR and IFN-/{beta}/{lambda}1/{lambda}2 proteins were quantified by immunoassay. Expression of four interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs; OAS1/IFITM3/ISG15/MxA) was also measured by RT-droplet digital PCR. Additionally, susceptibility of each virus to IFN-/{beta}/{lambda}2 recombinant proteins was determined. Our results showed that influenza A, and especially A/H3N2, interfered with both SARS-CoV-2 viruses, but that SARS-CoV-2 only interfered with A/H1N1. Consistently with these results, influenza, and particularly the A/H3N2 strain, caused a higher production of IFN proteins and expression of ISGs than SARS-CoV-2. The IFN production induced by SARS-CoV-2 was marginal and its presence during coinfections with influenza was associated with a reduced IFN response. All viruses were susceptible to exogenous IFNs, with the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron being less susceptible to type I and type III IFNs, respectively. Thus, influenza A causes a viral interference towards SARS-CoV-2 most likely through an IFN response. The opposite is not necessarily true, and a concurrent infection with both viruses leads to a lower IFN response. Taken together, these results help us to understand how SARS-CoV-2 interacts with another major respiratory pathogen. Author summaryDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, non-pharmaceutical measures were able to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and most respiratory viruses. Since the ease of these measures, SARS-CoV-2 variants and other viruses, such as influenza A, have started to co-circulate and can now infect a same host and interact with each other. These interactions can lead to attenuated or aggravated infections and can affect the timing of epidemics. Therefore, it is very important to elucidate how the new SARS-CoV-2 interacts with other viruses to better predict their implications in human health and their epidemic activity. Our work contributes to better understand these interactions using viruses that have likely co-circulated after lifting mitigation interventions, i.e., SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and a contemporary influenza A/H3N2 strain. We studied how each virus may affect the other virus growth and how these interactions were associated with the innate immune response of the host. We found that a prior infection with influenza A can decrease the growth of SARS-CoV-2 while the latter reduces the innate immune response. Our results help to understand the interplay between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A in the host and may improve mathematical models predicting epidemics.

microbiology↗

Validation of Flavivirus Infectious Clones Carrying Fluorescent Markers for Antiviral Drug Screening and Replication Studies

Flaviviruses have emerged as major arthropod-transmitted pathogens and represent an increasing public health problem worldwide. High-throughput screening can be facilitated by the use of viruses that express easily detectable marker proteins. Developing molecular tools such as reporter-carrying versions of flaviviruses for studying viral replication and screening of antiviral compounds therefore represents a top priority. However, the engineering of flaviviruses carrying either fluorescent or luminescent reporters remains challenging due to the genetic instability caused by marker insertion; therefore, new approaches to overcome these limitations are needed. Here, we describe reverse genetic methods which includes design and validation of infectious clones of Zika, Kunjin and Dengue viruses harboring different reporter genes for infection, rescue, imaging and morphology using super-resolution microscopy. It was observed that for different flaviviruses constructs with identical design displayed strikingly different genetic stability while corresponding virions resembled wild-type virus particles in shape and size. A successful strategy was assessed to increase stability of rescued reporter virus and permit antiviral drug screening based on quantitative automated fluorescence microscopy and replication studies.

molecular biology↗

Low selectivity index of ivermectin and macrocyclic lactones on SARS-CoV2 replication in vitro argues against their therapeutic use for COVID-19.

There are very limited antiviral therapeutic options for coronavirus infections, therefore global drug re-purposing efforts are paramount to identify available compounds that could provide clinical benefits to patients with COVID-19. Ivermectin was first approved for human use as an endectocide in the 1980s. It remains one of the most important global health medicines in history and has recently been shown to exert in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2. However, the macrocyclic lactone family of compounds has not previously been evaluated for activity against SARS-CoV-2. The present study aims at comparing their anti-viral activity in relevant pulmonary cell lines in vitro. Here, in vitro antiviral activity of the avermectins (ivermectin and selamectin) and milbemycins (moxidectin and milbemycin oxime) were assessed against a clinical isolate from a CHU Montpellier patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020. Ivermectin demonstrated anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity in vitro in human pulmonary cells in comparison to VeroE6 (with EC50 of 1-3 M). Similarly, the other macrocyclic lactones moxidectin, milbemycin oxime and selamectin reduced SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro (with EC50 of 2-5 M). Immunofluorescence assays with ivermectin and moxidectin showed a reduction in the number of infected and polynuclear cells suggesting a drug action on viral cell fusion. However, cellular toxicity of the avermectins and milbemycins during infection showed a very low selectivity index <10 for all compounds. In conclusion, none of these agents appears suitable for human use for its anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity per se, due to low selectivity index. This is discussed in regards to recent clinical COVID studies on ivermectin.

microbiology↗

Direct visualization of native infectious SARS-CoV-2 ant its inactivation forms using high resolution Atomic Force Microscopy

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for COVID19, a new emerging pandemic affecting humans. Here, single viruses were analyze by atomic force microscopy (AFM) operating directly in a level 3 biosafety (BSL3) facility, which appeared as a fast and powerful method to assess infectious virus morphology in its native conformation, or upon inactivation treatments, at the nanoscale level and in 3D. High resolution AFM reveals structurally intact infectious and inactivated SARS-CoV-2 upon low concentration of formaldehyde treatment. This protocol allows the preparation of intact inactivated SARS-CoV-2 particles for safe use of samples out of level 3 laboratory, as revealed by combining AFM and plaque assays, to accelerate researches against the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, we illustrate how adapted BSL3-atomic force microscopy is a remarkable toolbox for rapid and direct virus identification and characterization.

microbiology↗