bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hempel, C. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Hempel, C. A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Predicting environmental stressor levels with machine learning: a comparison between amplicon sequencing, metagenomics, and total RNA sequencing based on taxonomically assigned data

BackgroundMicrobes are increasingly (re)considered for environmental assessments because they are powerful indicators for the health of ecosystems. The complexity of microbial communities necessitates powerful novel tools to derive conclusions for environmental decision-makers, and machine learning is a promising option in that context. While amplicon sequencing is typically applied to assess microbial communities, metagenomics and total RNA sequencing (herein summarized as omics-based methods) can provide a more holistic picture of microbial biodiversity at sufficient sequencing depths. Despite this advantage, amplicon sequencing and omics-based methods have not yet been compared for taxonomy-based environmental assessments with machine learning. In this study, we applied 16S and ITS-2 sequencing, metagenomics, and total RNA sequencing to samples from a stream mesocosm experiment that investigated the impacts of two aquatic stressors, insecticide and increased fine sediment deposition, on stream biodiversity. We processed the data using similarity clustering and denoising (only applicable to amplicon sequencing) as well as multiple taxonomic levels, data types, feature selection, and machine learning algorithms and evaluated the stressor prediction performance of each generated model for a total of 1,536 evaluated combinations of taxonomic datasets and data-processing methods. ResultsSequencing and data-processing methods had a substantial impact on stressor prediction. While omics-based methods detected much more taxa than amplicon sequencing, 16S sequencing outperformed all other sequencing methods in terms of stressor prediction based on the Matthews Correlation Coefficient. However, even the highest observed performance for 16S sequencing was still only moderate. Omics-based methods performed poorly overall, but this was likely due to insufficient sequencing depth. Data types had no impact on performance while feature selection significantly improved performance for omics-based methods but not for amplicon sequencing. ConclusionAmplicon sequencing might be a better candidate for machine-learning-based environmental stressor prediction than omics-based methods, but the latter require further research at higher sequencing depths to confirm this conclusion. More sampling could improve stressor prediction performance, and while this was not possible in the context of our study, thousands of sampling sites are monitored for routine environmental assessments, providing an ideal framework to further refine the approach for possible implementation in environmental diagnostics.

genomics↗

Reconstruction of Small Subunit Ribosomal RNA from High-Throughput Sequencing Data: A Comparative Study of Metagenomics and Total RNA Sequencing

The small subunit (SSU) ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is the most commonly used marker for the identification of microbial taxa, but its full-length reconstruction from high-throughput sequencing (HTS) data remains challenging, especially for complex and diverse environmental samples. Metagenomics and total RNA sequencing (total RNA-Seq) are target-PCR-free HTS methods that are used to characterize microbial communities and simultaneously reconstruct SSU rRNA sequences. However, more testing is required to determine and improve their effectiveness. In this study, we processed metagenomics and total RNA-Seq data retrieved from a commercially available mock microbial community using 112 combinations of commonly used data-processing tools, determined SSU rRNA reconstruction completeness of both sequencing methods for each species in the mock community, and analyzed the impact of data-processing tools on SSU rRNA and genome completeness. Total RNA-Seq allowed for the complete or near-complete reconstruction of all mock community SSU rRNA sequences and outperformed metagenomics. SSU rRNA completeness of metagenomics strongly correlated with the genome size of mock community species. The impact of data-processing tools was overall low, although certain tools resulted in significantly lower SSU rRNA completeness. These results are promising for the high-throughput reconstruction of novel full-length SSU rRNA sequences and could advance the simultaneous application of multiple -omics approaches in routine environmental assessments to allow for more holistic assessments of ecosystems.

genomics↗

Metagenomics vs. total RNA sequencing: most accurate data-processing tools, microbial identification accuracy, and implications for freshwater assessments

Metagenomics and total RNA sequencing (total RNA-Seq) have the potential to improve the taxonomic identification of diverse microbial communities, which could allow for the incorporation of microbes into routine freshwater assessments. However, these targeted-PCR- free techniques require more testing and optimization. In this study, we processed metagenomics and total RNA-Seq data from a commercially available microbial mock community using 768 data-processing workflows, identified the most accurate data-processing tools, and compared their microbial identification accuracy at equal and increasing sequencing depths. The accuracy of data-processing tools substantially varied among replicates. Total RNA-Seq was more accurate than metagenomics at equal sequencing depths and even at sequencing depths almost one order of magnitude lower than those of metagenomics. We show that while data-processing tools require further exploration, total RNA-Seq might be a favorable alternative to metagenomics for targeted-PCR-free taxonomic identifications of microbial communities and might enable a substantial reduction in sequencing costs while maintaining accuracy. This could be particularly an advantage for routine freshwater assessments, which require cost-effective yet accurate methods, and might allow for the incorporation of microbes into freshwater assessments.

genomics↗