bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hedges, S. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Hedges, S. B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Detecting stabilizing, directional, and disruptive patterns of anthropogenic species loss with general models of nonrandom extinction

The selective landscape that gave rise to Earths species has shifted in the Anthropocene. Humans have accelerated extinction pressures, making efforts to detect general non-random patterns of extinction increasingly important. Much research has focused on detecting which traits make some species more likely to go extinct, such as large body size and slow reproductive rate in animals, limited dispersal in vascular plants, and narrow habitat requirements in cacti. However, general models for such non-random extinction are lacking. Here, we adapt the three general models of natural selection to classify non-random extinction as directional, disruptive, or stabilizing extinction. We develop a quantitative method for testing which general extinction model best describes observed data and apply it to the Caribbean lizard genus Leiocephalus as a case study. We surveyed the literature for recorded last occurrence for extinct and threat status for extant species. Eight species have gone extinct and ten are predicted to go extinct soon. Past extinctions in Leiocephalus showed directional extinction of large bodied species, while future-predicted extinctions exhibited a more complex extinction model similar to both random and stabilizing extinction with respect to body size. Similarly, future-predicted extinctions exhibited stabilizing extinction with respect to limb and tail lengths. Lizards with either very long or very short appendages are most likely to go extinct in the future. This shift from directional to stabilizing extinction for Leiocephalus is consistent with hunting, introduced predators, and habitat loss that first increased extinction pressure on the largest species and then extinction pressure on species that deviate from an adaptive peak centered on a generalist ground-lizard body plan. As adaptive optima shift in the Anthropocene, general models of non-random extinction are essential to developing a mature strategy for future successful conservation efforts.

ecology↗

Elevated human footprint on islands promotes both introduction and extinction probability of insular reptiles at opposite ends of geographic, evolutionary and ecological continua

Species ranges are changing in the Anthropocene, the ranges of introduced species are expanding, while extinction-prone species are contracting. Introductions and extinctions are both caused by how species respond to human impacts, but it is unknown why the ranges of some species expand and some contract. Here, we test that this opposite response of human impact is due to introduced and extinction-prone species falling at opposite ends of geographic, evolutionary, or ecological trait continua. We constructed a database of native range maps, traits, phylogenetic relationships, and the introduction and extinction-prone status of squamate reptiles with ranges native to the Western Hemisphere. Across >3,000 snake and lizard species (88% of known native squamates), 142 had been introduced elsewhere and 483 were extinction-prone (i.e., extinct, vulnerable, threatened). To explain variation in status, we first tested if the same human-impacted regions in the Americas contained the native ranges of species of either status. Second, we tested for phylogenetic signal in species status. Finally, we tested the explanatory power of multiple trait continua. The native ranges of introduced and extinction-prone reptiles were clustered in island regions with high human impact vs. mainland regions with lower human impact. Phylogenetic signal was weak for status, but introduced and extinction-prone species were clustered in different clades. All geographic and ecological traits that explained both statuses supported the opposite ends hypothesis. Introduced species had larger, edgier ranges, while extinction-prone species had smaller, simpler ranges. Introduced species were mostly herbivorous/omnivorous, while extinction-prone species were mostly carnivorous. Introduced species produced larger clutches, while extinction-prone species were smaller in body size. In the Anthropocene, the naive ranges of introduced and extinction-prone species are in the same human-impacted regions where trait continua, having opposite effects, determine whether species ranges expand or contract in the continuing face of global change.

ecology↗