Biology subjects

Hebras, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Hebras, C..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Reduction of cortical pulling at mitotic entry facilitates aster centration

Although it has been studied for more than a century, the question of how one cell divides into two equal parts is still not fully resolved. Zygotes have provided much of the mechanistic insight into how the mitotic apparatus finds the center of the cell since the centrally-located mitotic apparatus is created from a large sperm aster that forms at the cortex and thus far from the zygote center. Here we show that in ascidians, the sperm aster extends throughout the cytoplasm during interphase yet remains located near the cortex and does not migrate towards the zygote center. It is only at mitotic entry, when the sperm aster has duplicated and the mitotic apparatus is being assembled, that most of the migration and centration occurs. This temporal pattern of centration behavior is mirrored by primate zygotes (including human). The current mechanisms of aster centration include cytoplasmic pulling that scale with microtubule (MT) length, MT pushing against the proximal cortex or MT-based cortical pulling. However, it is not yet known whether and how these 3 mechanisms are coordinated to prevent aster migration during interphase and trigger migration at mitotic entry. By monitoring quantitatively all three mechanisms (cytoplasmic pulling, pushing and cortical pulling) we have discovered that cortical pulling is switched off as the zygote enters mitosis while both cytoplasmic pulling and proximal cortical pushing remain active. Physical simulations could recapitulate both the static and migratory aspects of sperm aster and mitotic apparatus behavior. We therefore surmise that the reduction in cortical pulling at mitotic entry represents a switch that allows proximal cortical pushing forces and cytoplasmic pulling forces to center the nascent mitotic apparatus. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=156 SRC="FIGDIR/small/533625v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@135189dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e2ef1dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c070f7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@38832f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LISperm aster/mitotic apparatus centration occurs at entry into first mitosis C_LIO_LIMT-based cortical pulling is active during interphase and switched off at mitotic entry C_LIO_LILoss of cortical pulling at mitosis entry facilitates centration of the aster C_LIO_LIMT-based cytoplasmic pulling is active during both interphase and mitosis C_LIO_LIAgent-based simulations advocate the need for cytoplasmic pulling, a switch in cortical pulling and a minor role of pushing for aster centration at mitotic entry. C_LI

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Role of midbody remnant in meiosis II creating tethered polar bodies

Polar body (PB) formation is an extreme form of unequal cell division that occurs in oocytes due to the eccentric position of the small meiotic spindle near the oocyte cortex. Prior to PB formation, a chromatin-centered process causes the cortex overlying the meiotic chromosomes to become polarized. This polarized cortical subdomain marks the site where a cortical protrusion or outpocket forms at the oocyte surface creating the future PBs. We observed that PB1 becomes tethered to the egg via PB2, indicating that the site of PB1 cytokinesis directed the precise site for PB2 emission. We therefore studied whether the midbody remnant left behind following PB1 emission was involved, together with the egg chromatin, in defining the precise cortical site for PB2 emission. During outpocketing of PB2 in ascidians, we discovered that a small corps around 1m in diameter protruded from the center of the cortical outpocket that will form the future PB2, which we call the \"polar corps\". During emission of PB2, this small polar corps became localized between PB2 and PB1 and appeared to link PB2 to PB1. We tested the hypothesis that this small polar corps on the surface of the forming PB2 was the midbody remnant from the previous round of PB1 cytokinesis. We had previously discovered that Plk1::Ven labeled midbody remnants in ascidian embryos. We therefore used Plk1::Ven to follow the dynamics of the PB1 midbody remnant during meiosis II. Plk1::Ven strongly labeled the small polar corps that formed on the surface of the cortical outpocket that created PB2. Following emission of PB2, this polar corps was rich in Plk1::Ven and linked PB2 to PB1. By labelling actin (with LifeAct::mCherry/GFP or TRITC-Phalloidin) we also demonstrated that actin accumulates at the midbody remnant and also forms a cortical cap around the midbody remnant in meiosis II that prefigured the precise site of cortical outpocketing during PB2 emission. Phalloidin staining of actin and immunolabelling of anti-phospho aPKC during meiosis II in eggs that had PB1 removed showed that the midbody remnant remained within the egg following emission of PB1. Dynamic imaging of microtubules labelled with Ens::3GFP, MAP7::GFP or EB3::3GFP showed that one pole of the second meiotic spindle was located near the midbody remnant while the other pole rotated away from the cortex during outpocketing. Finally, we report that failure of the second meiotic spindle to rotate can lead to the formation of two cortical outpockets at anaphase II, one above each set of chromatids. It is not known whether the midbody remnant of PB1 is involved in directing the precise location of PB2 in other species as in ascidians. However, a review of the literature indicates that PB1 is tethered to the egg surface via PB2 in a number of species including members of the cnidarians, lophotrochozoa and echinoids, suggesting that the midbody remnant formed during PB1 emission may be involved in directing the precise site of PB2 emission throughout the invertebrates.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Kif2 microtubule depolymerase is required for unequal cell division and localizes to a subdomain of cortical endoplasmic reticulum

Unequal cell division (UCD) is a fundamental process responsible for creating sibling cell size asymmetry; however, how microtubules are specifically depolymerized on one aster of the mitotic spindle creating a smaller sibling cell during UCD has remained elusive. Using invertebrate chordate embryos (ascidian) that possess a large cortical structure (CAB) that causes UCD, we identified a microtubule depolymerase (Kif2) involved in creating cell size asymmetry. Kif2 localizes to the cortical subdomain of endoplasmic reticulum in the CAB. During three successive UCDs, Kif2 protein accumulates at the CAB during interphase and is delocalized from the CAB in mid mitosis. Rapid imaging of microtubule dynamics at the cortex revealed that microtubules do not penetrate the CAB during interphase. Inhibition of Kif2 function prevents the development of mitotic aster asymmetry and centrosome movement towards the CAB thereby blocking UCD, whereas locally increasing microtubule depolymerization causes exaggerated asymmetric spindle positioning. This study provides insights into the fundamental process of UCD and for the first time shows that a microtubule depolymerase is localized to a cortical site controlling UCD.

cell biology↗