Biology subjects

Heberling, J. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Heberling, J. M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Evaluating the definition and distribution of spring ephemeral wildflowers in eastern North America

The herbaceous layer accounts for the majority of plant biodiversity in eastern North American forests, encompassing substantial variation in life history strategy and function. One group of early season herbaceous understory species, colloquially referred to as "spring ephemeral wildflowers," are of particular ecological and cultural importance. Despite this, little is known about the prevalence and biogeographic patterns of the spring ephemeral strategy. Here, we used georeferenced and dated observations from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) to define the phenological strategies of 559 herbaceous, vascular, understory plant species in eastern North America from a composite species list encompassing 16 site-level species lists ranging from Georgia to southern Canada. Specifically, we estimated activity periods from regional observations (primarily consisting of citizen scientist iNaturalist observations) and classified species as ephemeral if they completed all aboveground activity (including leafing, flowering, fruiting, and senescence) prior to an estimated date of canopy closure derived from remote-sensed data. We then evaluated the richness of these species at the landscape scale using estimates of biogeographic and environmental drivers aggregated for 100 km x 100 km grid cells. Importantly, our spatially-explicit approach defines each species spring ephemerality along a continuous scale (which we call the Ephemerality Index, EI) based on the proportion of its range in which it senesces before canopy closure (with EI = 0 indicating a species that is never ephemeral and EI = 1 indicating a species that is always ephemeral). We found that 18.4% (103 species) of understory wildflowers exhibited spring ephemerality in at least part of their range, with only 3.4% of all species exhibiting ephemeral behavior in all parts of their range. Ephemeral species had higher overall richness and composed a higher proportion of understory biodiversity in low-elevation areas with intermediate spring temperatures and elevated spring precipitation. Spring ephemerals peaked in both absolute species richness and relative proportion at mid latitudes. These biogeographic patterns deserve further study in other regions of the world and to uncover mechanisms behind these patterns. Using our new metric, our results demonstrate that the spring ephemeral strategy is not a discrete category, but rather a continuum that can vary across species ranges.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2023

Phenological mismatch between trees and wildflowers: Reconciling divergent findings in two recent analyses

O_LIRecent evidence suggests that community science and herbarium datasets yield similar estimates of species phenological sensitivities to temperature. Despite this, two recent studies by Alecrim et al. (2023) and Miller et al. (2022) found contradictory results when investigating an identical ecological mechanism (phenological mismatch of wildflower flowering and of shading by deciduous trees; "phenological escape") with separate datasets. C_LIO_LIHere, we investigated whether differences between the two studies results could be reconciled by testing four hypotheses related to model design, species selection, spatiotemporal data extent, and phenophase selection. C_LIO_LIHybrid model structures brought results from the two datasets closer together but did not fully reconcile the differences between the studies. Cropping the datasets to match spatial and temporal extents appeared to reconcile most differences but only at the cost of much higher uncertainty associated with reduced sample size. Neither species selection nor phenophase selection seemed to be responsible for differences in results. C_LIO_LISynthesis: Our analysis suggests that although species-level estimates of phenological sensitivity may be similar between crowd-sourced and herbarium datasets, inherent differences in the types and extent of data may lead to contradictory inference about complex biotic interactions. We conclude that, until community science data repositories grow to match the range of climate conditions present in herbarium collections or until herbarium collections grow to match the spatial extent and temporal frequency of community science repositories, ecological studies should ideally be evaluated using both datasets to test the possibility of biased results from either. C_LI

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

Wildflower phenological escape differs by continent and spring temperature

Temperate understory plant species are at risk from climate change and anthropogenic threats that include increased deer herbivory, habitat loss, pollinator declines and mismatch, and nutrient pollution. Recent work suggests that spring ephemeral wildflowers may be at additional risk due to phenological mismatch with deciduous canopy trees. The study of this dynamic, commonly referred to as "phenological escape", and its sensitivity to spring temperature is limited to eastern North America. Here, we use herbarium specimens to show that phenological sensitivity to spring temperature is remarkably conserved for understory wildflowers across North America, Europe, and Asia, but that canopy trees in North America are significantly more sensitive to spring temperature compared to in Asia and Europe. We predict that advancing tree phenology will lead to decreasing spring light windows in North America while spring light windows will be maintained or even increase in Asia and Europe in response to projected climate warming.

ecology↗