bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hayatigolkhatmi, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Hayatigolkhatmi, K..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Cell cycle control of chromatin creates a therapeutic window for epigenetic therapy in tumors

The relationship between cell cycle length and differentiation competence is well established in developmental biology, particularly in embryonic stem cells, where a short G1 phase maintains pluripotency and G1 lengthening permits lineage commitment. Whether this principle operates in cancer cells, where the cell cycle is deregulated and G1 is frequently shortened, and whether it can be pharmacologically exploited for therapy, has not been tested. Here we show that the duration of G1 is a causal determinant of chromatin state in cancer cells and that extending G1 creates a therapeutic window for epigenetic drugs. Using acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as a model, we demonstrate that low-dose palbociclib, at concentrations well below those required for cytostatic arrest, extends G1 without halting proliferation. This modest prolongation reshapes the histone modification landscape: repressive marks (H3K9me2/3, H4K20me2/3) increase while acetylation decreases, and chromatin accessibility rises broadly in the euchromatic compartment. Naturally slow-cycling AML lines share this epigenetic signature regardless of their oncogenic driver mutations, and pharmacologically extending G1 in fast-cycling cells recapitulates it, establishing G1 length as a causal regulator of the cancer epigenome rather than a passive correlate. To identify epigenetic vulnerabilities created by G1 extension, we performed complementary drug and CRISPR-Cas9 screens in G1-extended AML cells. Both approaches converged on LSD1 (KDM1A): slow-cycling AML cells are intrinsically sensitive to LSD1 inhibition, while fast-cycling cells become sensitive when G1 is prolonged. The combination of low-dose palbociclib and LSD1 inhibition triggers differentiation and significantly prolongs survival in AML xenograft models. p21 (CDKN1A) emerges as the central molecular determinant of this response. In slow-cycling AML cells, p21 is highly expressed and its knockdown abolishes LSD1 inhibitor sensitivity. Structure-function analysis using p21 mutants separates the two known activities of p21: the CDK-inhibitory function (which extends G1) is required for sensitization, whereas the PCNA-binding function is dispensable. Three pharmacological routes converge on the same endpoint, CDK inhibition, G1 extension, and a differentiation-competent chromatin state: direct CDK4/6 inhibition by palbociclib, p21 overexpression, and p21 induction through HDAC or EZH1/2 inhibitors. Palbociclib bypasses the requirement for p21 entirely, confirming that G1 length itself, not p21 as a protein, is the critical variable. Mechanistically, the combination of G1 extension and LSD1 inhibition produces a qualitatively distinct chromatin state rather than an additive one. ATAC-seq reveals thousands of combination-exclusive accessible regions, enriched for footprints of myeloid differentiation transcription factors including SPI1/PU.1, IRF1, and STAT1/2. A double-lock principle governs this remodeling: palbociclib drives the removal of repressive marks (H3K9me3 and H3K27me3), while LSD1 inhibition installs active marks at the newly accessible regions. The ncBAF chromatin remodeling complex, identified in our CRISPR screen and validated by knockout of its essential subunits BRD9 and SMARCD1, is specifically required for this response. Loss of ncBAF abolishes the combination-induced chromatin remodeling and differentiation program but does not affect the initial G1 extension or retinoic acid-induced differentiation, indicating that ncBAF specifically couples cell-cycle modulation to chromatin remodeling rather than acting as a general differentiation factor. The principle generalizes beyond AML. In melanoma, breast cancer, and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), sensitivity to LSD1 inhibition tracks with p21 expression and cycling speed. Primary melanoma samples stratified by p21 recapitulate the same pattern: p21-high, slow-cycling cells are sensitive; p21-low, fast-cycling cells are resistant but can be sensitized by palbociclib cotreatment. Cisplatin-induced drug-tolerant persister (DTP) cells, which emerge as a slow-cycling, chemo-resistant population and upregulate both p21 and LSD1, become vulnerable to LSD1 inhibition and are eradicated by the combination. In melanoma patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, p21-high tumors respond to LSD1 inhibitor monotherapy, while p21-low tumors are sensitized by palbociclib cotreatment, with p21 knockdown abolishing the response. Together, these findings establish cell-cycle duration as a tunable regulator of the cancer epigenome and demonstrate that pharmacological G1 extension converts cytostatic CDK4/6 inhibition into an epigenetic sensitization strategy. Both fast-proliferating and slow-cycling tumor compartments (including drug-resistant persisters) can be targeted by matching the epigenomic state to the appropriate combination of cell-cycle modulators and epigenetic drugs. p21 emerges as a candidate biomarker for patient stratification. More broadly, our work repositions the cell cycle from a passive conduit for proliferation signals to an active, druggable regulator of chromatin fate, with implications that extend from cancer therapy to stem cell biology and regenerative medicine.

cancer biology↗

LSD1 serine 166 is a phosphorylation switch for chromatinlandscaping, gene activation, and tissue remodeling

LSD1 is a histone 3 (H3) demethylase that can either repress or activate gene expression. We discover here that the so far enigmatic balance between these two activities in non-hormonal cancer cells is regulated by phosphorylation of serine 166 (S166) on LSD1. SET-mediated Protein Phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibition in KRAS mutant cells promotes S166 phosphorylation. Endogenous LSD1 S166 alanine mutant (S166A) cells display H3 lysine 9 demethylation and acetylation, euchromatin, and gene activation. Mechanistically this is explained by the impaired interaction of S166A mutant LSD1 with repressor proteins SNAI2 and MYBP1. Functionally LSD1 S166A mutant cells display augmented beta1 integrin activity and stress fiber formation, and the mutant xenograft tumors have altered tumor microenvironment associated with increased macrophage recruitment. Collectively, PP2A-regulated S166 of LSD1 is a phosphorylation switch for epigenetic gene activation in non-hormonal cancer cells. Conceptually we demonstrate how dephosphorylation of one amino acid on a non-histone protein shapes chromatin landscape in cancer cells, and modify tumor stroma, and immune cell content. Highlights* Mechanism for gene activation by LSD1 in non-hormonal cancers * Single phosphorylation switch in a non-histone protein controls epigenetic landscape * Epigenetic protein phosphorylation in cancer cells shapes tumour immune microenvironment * Novel function for Protein Phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in epigenome regulation via LSD1 Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=185 SRC="FIGDIR/small/653937v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (54K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19548b3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d7fd4dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13707b3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1da7b71_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

genomics↗

Automated workflow for the cell cycle analysis of non-adherent and adherent cells using a machine learning approach

Understanding the details of the cell cycle at the level of individual cells is critical for both cellular biology and cancer research. While existing methods using specific fluorescent markers have advanced our ability to study the cell cycle in cells that adhere to surfaces, there is a clear gap when it comes to non-adherent cells. In this study, we combine a specialized surface to improve cell attachment, the genetically-encoded FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image processing and analysis pipeline, and a custom machine-learning algorithm. This combined approach allowed us to precisely measure the duration of different cell cycle phases in non-adherent cells. Our method provided detailed information from hundreds of cells under different experimental conditions in a fully automated manner. We validated this approach in two different Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) cell lines, NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics. Additionally, we tested the impact of drugs affecting the cell cycle in NB4 cells. Importantly, our cell cycle analysis system is freely available and has also been validated for use with adherent cells. In summary, this report introduces a comprehensive, automated method for studying the cell cycle in both adherent and non-adherent cells, offering a valuable tool for cancer research and drug development.

cell biology↗