bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hauduc, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Hauduc, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

EpiATLAS - a reference for human epigenomic research

The sequence of the human genome provides a foundation for understanding cellular processes in health and disease1. The organisation of this primary genetic information into cell-specific structure and function is critical to understanding the cell type-specific interpretation and execution of the genome. Epigenetic processes are essential for packaging and higher-level functional organisation of the genome, and changes therein are increasingly recognised as contributors to human disease. Building on primary data generated by multinational consortia, the International Human Epigenome Consortium2 (IHEC) has uniformly processed a collection of more than 2000 comprehensive human reference epigenomes, collectively referred to as EpiATLAS. This effort involved the development of standardised molecular and bioinformatics protocols, metadata models, and analytical tools to manage, integrate, display, and share vast amounts of epigenomic data. This includes the creation of a publicly available Epigenome Reference Registry, which provides a system for accessing protected human subject datasets and facilitates open searching of de-identified samples and experimental data. The integrated EpiATLAS ecosystem and its comprehensive human reference epigenome maps provide an unprecedented resource for the biosciences, expanding the annotated epigenomic landscape while uncovering previously unappreciated relationships among regulatory layers and revealing how epigenetic inputs underpin fundamental cellular functions and disease associations.

genomics↗

Cell type-specific epigenomic variation and its association with genotype in the human breast

BackgroundUnderstanding the interplay between genomic variation and the epigenome is fundamental to the study of development and mechanisms of disease. Previous studies have leveraged population-scale genotype surveys to associate alleles with epigenomic states in heterogenous tissue types. However, epigenomes are inherently cell type-specific, giving rise to unique genome-epigenome interactions that can influence distinct functional states and susceptibility to disease. Moreover, the extent of individual variation in cell type-specific epigenotypes remains poorly understood, posing additional challenges to accurately link genotypes with epigenomic features. ResultsWe generated comprehensive genomic and epigenomic profiles of four functionally defined human breast epithelial cell types from eight healthy individuals. To quantify inter-individual epigenomic variation, we developed a statistical framework that measures variability in histone modification landscapes across individuals. This analysis revealed substantially greater variation in repressive chromatin marked by H3K27me3 than in active chromatin marked by H3K27ac and H3K4me3. Integrative chromatin state analysis further identified enhancer elements as the principal source of epigenomic divergence between individuals. Stable enhancer states corresponded to high-confidence cis-regulatory elements that underpin cell type-specific transcriptional programs, whereas variable enhancer states were enriched for environmentally responsive regulatory circuits. Mapping genetic variants associated with chromatin state variation uncovered extensive cell type-specificity, with nearly 90% of regulatory variants detected in only a single cell type. These associations were strongly enriched within active regulatory chromatin and, when integrated with gene expression, enabled the prioritization of functional regulatory variants. We experimentally validated one such variant, rs75071948, demonstrating allele-specific regulation of ANXA1 expression using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. ConclusionsOur study defines the landscape of normal epigenomic variation across the major human breast epithelial cell types and demonstrates that genome-epigenome interactions are highly cell type-specific. These findings establish cell type as a critical determinant of the functional interpretation of regulatory genetic variation and provide a framework for understanding how inherited genetic variation shapes normal breast biology and disease susceptibility.

genomics↗