bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hampton, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Hampton, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Hot and sick: impacts of warming and oomycete parasite infection on endemic dominant zooplankter of Lake Baikal.

Climate warming impacts ecosystems through multiple interacting pathways, including via direct thermal responses of individual taxa and the combined responses of closely interacting species. In this study we examined how warming and infection by an oomycete parasite affect the dominant zooplankter of Russias Lake Baikal, the endemic cold-adapted stenotherm Epischura baikalensis (Copepoda). We used a combination of laboratory experiments, long-term monitoring data and population modeling. Experiments showed large thermal mismatch between host and parasite, with strong negative effects of warm temperatures on E. baikalensis survival and reproduction and a negative synergistic effect of Saprolegnia infection. However, Saprolegnia infection had an unexpected positive effect on E. baikalensis reproductive output, which may be consistent with fecundity compensation by infected females. Long-term monitoring data showed that Saprolegnia infections were most common during the warmest periods of the year and that infected individuals tended to accumulate in deep water. Population models, parameterized with experimental and literature data, correctly predicted the timing of Saprolegnia epizootics, but overestimated the negative effect of warming on E.baikalensis populations. Models suggest that diel vertical migration may allow E. baikalensis to escape the negative effects of increasing temperatures and parasitism and enable E. baikalensis to persist as Lake Baikal warms. Our results contribute to understanding of how multiple interacting stressors affect warming pelagic ecosystems of cold lakes and oceans and show that the population-level consequences of thermal mismatch between hosts and parasites can vary seasonally, interannual and spatially.

ecology↗

Do Synthesis Centers Synthesize? A Semantic Analysis of Diversity and Performance

Synthesis centers are a recently-developed form of scientific organization that catalyzes and supports a form of interdisciplinary research that integrates diverse theories, methods and data across spatial or temporal scales, scientific phenomena, and forms of expertise to increase the generality, parsimony, applicability, or empirical soundness of scientific explanations. Research has shown the synthesis working group to be a distinctive form of scientific collaboration that reliably produces consequential, high-impact publications, but no one has asked: do synthesis working groups produce publications that are substantially more diverse than those produced outside of synthesis centers, and if so, how and with what effects? We have investigated these questions through a novel textual analysis. We found that if diversity is measured solely by mean difference in the Rao-Stirling (aggregate) measure of diversity, then the answer is no. But synthesis center papers have significantly greater variety and balance, but significantly lower disparity, than papers in the reference corpus. Synthesis center influence is mediated by the greater size of synthesis center collaborations (numbers of authors, distinct institutions, and references) but even when taking size into account, there is a persistent direct effect: synthesis center papers have significantly greater variety and balance, but less disparity, than papers in the reference corpus. We conclude by inviting further exploration of what this novel textual analysis approach might reveal about interdisciplinary research and by offering some practical implications of our results.

scientific communication and education↗