bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hampton, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Hampton, D..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

The Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1 regulates the morphology and maturation of human and rat oligodendrocytes

The Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein (FMRP) is an RNA binding protein that regulates the translation of multiple mRNAs and is expressed by neurons and glia in the mammalian brain. Loss of FMRP leads to Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), a common inherited form of intellectual disability and autism. While most research has been focusing on the neuronal contribution to FXS pathophysiology, the role of glia, particularly oligodendro-cytes, is largely unknown. FXS individuals are characterised by white matter changes which imply impairments in oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination. We hypothesized that FMRP regulates oligodendrocyte maturation and myelination during postnatal development. Using a combination of human pluripotent stem cell - derived oligodendrocytes and an Fmr1 knockout rat model, we studied the role of FMRP on mammalian oligodendrocyte development. We found that the loss of FMRP leads to shared defects in oligodendrocyte morphology in both rat and human systems in vitro which persist in the presence of FMRP expressing axons in chimeric engraftment models. Our findings point to species-conserved, cell-autonomous defects during oligodendrocyte maturation in FXS.

neuroscience↗

An EYA3/NF-κB/CCL2 signaling axis suppresses cytotoxic NK cells in the pre-metastatic niche to promote triple negative breast cancer metastasis

Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) exhibit high rates of metastases and poor prognoses. The Eyes absent (EYA) family of proteins are developmental transcriptional cofactors/phosphatases that are re-expressed and/or upregulated in numerous cancers. Herein, we demonstrate that EYA3 correlates with decreased survival in breast cancer, and that it strongly, and specifically, regulates metastasis via a novel mechanism that involves NF-kB signaling and an altered innate immune profile at the pre-metastatic niche (PMN). Remarkably, restoration of NF-kB signaling downstream of Eya3 knockdown (KD) restores metastasis without restoring primary tumor growth, isolating EYA3/NF-kB effects to the metastatic site. We show that secreted CCL2, regulated downstream of EYA3/NF-kB, specifically decreases cytotoxic NK cells in the PMN and that re-expression of Ccl2 in Eya3-KD cells is sufficient to rescue activation/levels of cytotoxic NK cells in vitro and at the PMN, where EYA3-mediated decreases in cytotoxic NK cells are required for metastatic outgrowth. Importantly, analysis of public breast cancer datasets uncovers a significant correlation of EYA3 with NF-kB/CCL2, underscoring the relevance of EYA3/NF-kB/CCL2 to human disease. Our findings suggest that inhibition of EYA3 could be a powerful means to re-activate the innate immune response at the PMN, inhibiting TNBC metastasis. SignificanceEYA3 promotes metastasis of TNBC cells by promoting NF-kB-mediated CCL2 expression and inhibiting cytotoxic NK cells at the pre-metastatic niche, highlighting a potential therapeutic target in this subset of breast cancer.

cancer biology↗

Performance comparison of the Maxim and Sedia Limiting Antigen Avidity assays for incidence surveillance

BackgroundTwo manufacturers, Maxim Biomedical and Sedia Biosciences Corporation, supply US CDC-approved versions of the HIV-1 Limiting Antigen Avidity EIA (LAg assay) for detecting recent HIV infection in cross-sectional incidence estimation. This study assesses and compares the performance of the Maxim and Sedia LAg assays for incidence surveillance.\n\nMethodsWe ran both assays on a panel of 2,500 well-characterized HIV-1-infected specimens, most with estimated dates of (detectable) infection. We analysed concordance of assay results, assessed reproducibility using repeat testing and estimated the critical performance characteristics of a test for recent infection--mean duration of recent infection (MDRI) and false-recent rate (FRR)--for a range of normalized optical density (ODn) recency discrimination thresholds, alone and in combination with viral load thresholds. We further defined three hypothetical surveillance scenarios and evaluated overall performance for incidence surveillance, defined as the precision of incidence estimates, by estimating context-specific performance characteristics.\n\nResultsThe Maxim assay produced lower ODn values than the Sedia assay on average, largely as a result of higher calibrator readings (mean calibrator OD of 0.749 vs. 0.643). Correlation of non-normalized OD readings was greater (R2 = 0.938) than those of ODn readings (R2 = 0.908), and the slope was closer to unity (1.054 vs. 0.899). Reproducibility of repeat testing of three blinded control specimens (25 replicates each) was slightly better for the Maxim assay (CV 8.9% to 14.8% vs. 13.2% to 15.0%). The MDRI of a Maxim-based algorithm at the standard recency discrimination threshold in combination with viral load (ODn [≤]1.5 & VL >1,000) was 201 days (95% CI: 180,223) and for Sedia was 171 days (95% CI: 152,191). Commensurately, the Maxim algorithm had a higher FRR in treatment-naive subjects (1.7% vs. 1.1%). We observed statistically significant differences in MDRI using the ODn alone ([≤]1.5) and in combination with viral load (>1,000). Under three fully-specified hypothetical surveillance scenarios (comparable to South Africa, Kenya and a concentrated epidemic), recent infection testing algorithms based on the two assays produced similar precision of incidence estimates.\n\nConclusionsDifferences in ODn measurements between the Maxim and Sedia LAg assays on the same specimens largely resulted from differences in the reactivity of calibrators supplied by the manufacturers. Performance for surveillance purposes was extremely similar, although different ODn thresholds were optimal and different values of MDRI and FRR were appropriate for use in survey planning and incidence estimation.

epidemiology↗

Two central pattern generators from the crab, Cancer borealis, respond robustly and differentially to extreme extracellular pH

Animals and their neuronal circuits must maintain function despite significant environmental fluctuations. The crab, Cancer borealis, experiences daily changes in ocean temperature and pH. Here, we describe the effects of extreme changes in extracellular pH - from pH 5.5 to 10.4 - on two central pattern generating networks, the stomatogastric and cardiac ganglia of C. borealis. Given that the physiological properties of ion channels are known to be sensitive to pH within the range tested, it is surprising that these rhythms generally remained robust from pH 6.1 to pH 8.8. Unexpectedly, the stomatogastric ganglion was more sensitive to acid while the cardiac ganglion was more sensitive to base. Considerable animal-to-animal variability was likely a consequence of similar network performance arising from variable sets of underlying conductances. Together, these results illustrate the potential difficulty in generalizing the effects of environmental perturbation across circuits, even within the same animal.\n\nAbbreviations

neuroscience↗