bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hamprecht, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Hamprecht, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Machine learning-guided discovery of a conserved plasmid proteomic signature enables MALDI-TOF MS detection of pOXA-48-carrying Enterobacterales

OXA-48 carbapenemases are among the most widespread and important resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales. Yet detecting carbapenemases by conventional workflows necessitates additional testing, thus delaying optimization of therapy and implementation of infection control measures. Here, we present a machine learning approach that identifies the conserved pOXA-48 plasmid directly from routine MALDI-TOF spectra acquired for species identification. The model detects pOXA-48 carriers with an AUROC of 0.96-0.98 across two independent hospital cohorts and instrument platforms, indicating near-perfect discrimination. Using bottom-up proteomics, plasmid conjugation, and plasmid curing, we link the discriminative MALDI-TOF spectral features to proteins encoded on pOXA-48, with DUF1496 domain-containing protein producing the most discriminative spectral feature. Our approach reframes the resistance prediction task from inferring a resistance phenotype to detecting a conserved plasmid through its expressed proteomic signature and has the potential to enable rapid MALDI-TOF MS-based diagnostics for a wide range of plasmid-based resistance determinants.

microbiology↗

Comparison of Vitek(R) 2, three different gradient strip tests and broth microdilution for detecting vanB-positive Enterococcus faecium isolates with low vancomycin MICs

ObjectivesIn 2018, EUCAST issued a warning regarding unreliable results of gradient strip tests for confirming vancomycin resistance in enterococci. We compared the performance of various diagnostic standard and confirmatory tests to identify and determine vanB-type vancomycin resistance.\n\nMethodsWe analysed a collection of vanB-positive E. faecium isolates (n = 68) with low level vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and compared the performance of Vitek(R) 2 (bioMerieux), of broth microdilution and of three different gradient strip test providers (Oxoid, Liofilchem, bioMerieux). For the latter we compared the standard procedure vs. a protocol with increased inoculum, a rich agar medium and a longer incubation time (\"macromethod\").\n\nResultsThe sensitivity of Vitek(R) 2 was 81% of vanB-isolates compared to 72% for broth microdilution and 61 - 63% for the three gradient strip tests using standard conditions. The \"macromethod\" substantially improved performance of all strip tests resulting in a sensitivity of 89 - 96% at 48h readout.\n\nConclusionsThe \"macromethod\" provided the overall best performance for recognition of vanB E. faecium. We therefore propose to adapt the EUCAST warning and to recommend the \"macromethod\" with an additional 48h readout or a confirmation by a vanB-specific PCR from culture.

microbiology↗