bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Halfon, M. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Halfon, M. S..

9 recordsLinked to original sources

EnhancerDetector: Enhancer Discovery from Human to Fly via Interpretable Deep Learning

BackgroundDeciphering how enhancers encode regulatory information in DNA remains a central genomics challenge, as sequencing outpaces functional annotation. A key question is whether enhancers possess an intrinsic, sequence-based "enhancerness" distinguishing them from other regions, independent of species, cell type, or assay. Confirming its existence and learnability is both biologically fundamental and essential for scalable genome annotation. ResultsWe introduce EnhancerDetector, a convolutional neural network-based framework for cross-species enhancer prediction that combines high accuracy with biological interpretability. Trained on human data, EnhancerDetector achieves strong performance across human, mouse, and fly datasets, consistently outperforming existing methods in precision and F1. It generalizes to datasets generated using diverse experimental assays. Unlike chromatin feature-based predictors requiring complex post hoc thresholding, EnhancerDetector directly outputs enhancer probability scores from short sequence windows, simplifying enhancer discovery workflows. An ensemble strategy further improves prediction reliability by reducing false positives. EnhancerDetector supports fine-tuning on new species and retains strong performance even when adapted with as few as 20,000 enhancer sequences, making it ideal for newly sequenced genomes with limited experimental data. For interpretability and visualization, we apply class activation maps to identify sequence regions predictive of enhancer activity. Experimental validation in transgenic flies confirms the predictive power of EnhancerDetector : five of six tested candidates drove reporter expression, and four exhibited expression patterns supported by prior literature. These analyses highlight distinct sequence and contextual features that confer what we term "enhancerness:" enhancer sequences possess a characteristic, identifiable signature. ConclusionsEnhancerDetector provides a sequence-based and interpretable framework for enhancer discovery across species and experimental contexts. Our results support the presence of recurring enhancer-associated sequence features that can be learned from DNA sequence and transferred across genomes. By combining cross-species prediction, fine-tuning, model interpretation, and experimental validation, EnhancerDetector offers a practical approach for prioritizing candidate enhancers in well-studied genomes. These features position EnhancerDetector as a useful first-stage annotation tool for identifying putative enhancers in newly sequenced genomes with limited experimental data.

bioinformatics↗

Regulatory genome annotation of 33 insect species

Annotation of newly-sequenced genomes frequently includes genes, but rarely covers important non-coding genomic features such as the cis-regulatory modules--e.g., enhancers and silencers--that regulate gene expression. Here, we begin to remedy this situation by developing a workflow for rapid initial annotation of insect regulatory sequences, and provide a searchable database resource with enhancer predictions for 33 genomes. Using our previously-developed SCRMshaw computational enhancer prediction method, we predict over 2.8 million regulatory sequences along with the tissues where they are expected to be active, in a set of insect species ranging over 360 million years of evolution. Extensive analysis and validation of the data provides several lines of evidence suggesting that we achieve a high true-positive rate for enhancer prediction. One, we show that our predictions target specific loci, rather than random genomic locations. Two, we predict enhancers in orthologous loci across a diverged set of species to a significantly higher degree than random expectation would allow. Three, we demonstrate that our predictions are highly enriched for regions of accessible chromatin. Four, we achieve a validation rate in excess of 70% using in vivo reporter gene assays. As we continue to annotate both new tissues and new species, our regulatory annotation resource will provide a rich source of data for the research community and will have utility for both small-scale (single gene, single species) and large-scale (many genes, many species) studies of gene regulation. In particular, the ability to search for functionally-related regulatory elements in orthologous loci should greatly facilitate studies of enhancer evolution even among distantly related species.

genomics↗

EnhancerTracker: Comparing cell-type-specific enhancer activity of DNA sequence triplets via an ensemble of deep convolutional neural networks

MotivationTranscriptional enhancers -- unlike promoters -- are unrestrained by distance or strand orientation with respect to their target genes, making their computational identification a challenge. Further, there are insufficient numbers of confirmed enhancers for many cell types, preventing robust training of machine-learning-based models for enhancer prediction for such cell types. ResultsWe present EnhancerTracker, a novel tool that leverages an ensemble of deep separable convolutional neural networks to identify cell-type-specific enhancers with the need of only two confirmed enhancers. EnhancerTracker is trained, validated, and tested on 52,789 putative enhancers obtained from the FANTOM5 Project and control sequences derived from the human genome. Unlike available tools, which accept one sequence at a time, the input to our tool is three sequences; the first two are enhancers active in the same cell type. EnhancerTracker outputs 1 if the third sequence is an enhancer active in the same cell type(s) where the first two enhancers are active. It outputs 0 otherwise. On a held-out set (15%), EnhancerTracker achieved an accuracy of 64%, a specificity of 93%, a recall of 35%, a precision of 84%, and an F1 score of 49%. Availability and implementationhttps://github.com/BioinformaticsToolsmith/EnhancerTracker Contacthani.girgis@tamuk.edu

bioinformatics↗

Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation in Anopheles gambiae revealed by allele specific expression

Malaria control relies on insecticides targeting the mosquito vector, but this is increasingly compromised by insecticide resistance, which can be achieved by elevated expression of detoxifying enzymes that metabolize the insecticide. In diploid organisms, gene expression is regulated both in cis, by regulatory sequences on the same chromosome, and by trans acting factors, affecting both alleles equally. Differing levels of transcription can be caused by mutations in cis-regulatory modules (CRM), but few of these have been identified in mosquitoes. We crossed bendiocarb resistant and susceptible Anopheles gambiae strains to identify cis-regulated genes that might be responsible for the resistant phenotype using RNAseq, and cis-regulatory module sequences controlling gene expression in insecticide resistance relevant tissues were predicted using machine learning. We found 115 genes showing allele specific expression in hybrids of insecticide susceptible and resistant strains, suggesting cis regulation is an important mechanism of gene expression regulation in Anopheles gambiae. The genes showing allele specific expression included a higher proportion of Anopheles specific genes on average younger than genes those with balanced allelic expression. Author SummaryThe evolution of insecticide resistance, including resistance that is due to changes in the expression levels of certain resistance associated genes is threatening progress in malaria control. We investigated how the expression of genes in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae is controlled, by implementing a method for the first time in this species. Each mosquito inherits a set of chromosomes from both parents, so has a maternal and paternal copy of most genes. When a gene is expressed, the DNA encoding that gene is transcribed into messenger RNA. This process is controlled by the cellular environment and by other DNA sequences on the same chromosome as each gene. We crossed mosquitoes from insecticide resistant and susceptible strains to equalize the cellular environment and then measured the levels of messenger RNA from both gene copies. 115 genes showed consistently different messenger RNA levels between gene copies in most crosses, suggesting these genes are regulated by factors on the same chromosome. There were relatively more Anopheles specific genes with imbalanced expression. Using machine learning we identified DNA sequences that may be responsible for controlling gene expression in mosquito tissues; several of these sequences were close to genes with imbalanced expression.

genetics↗

Conserved and novel enhancers regulate expression of Aedes aegypti single-minded in the embryonic ventral midline

Transcriptional cis-regulatory modules, e.g., enhancers, control the time and location of metazoan gene expression. While changes in enhancers can provide a powerful force for evolution, there is also significant deep conservation of enhancers for developmentally important genes, with function and sequence characteristics maintained over hundreds of millions of years of divergence. Not well understood, however, is how the overall regulatory composition of a locus evolves, with important outstanding questions such as how many enhancers are conserved vs. novel, and to what extent are the locations of conserved enhancers within a locus maintained? We begin here to address these questions with a comparison of the respective single-minded (sim) loci in the two dipteran species Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) and Aedes aegypti (mosquito). sim encodes a highly conserved transcription factor that mediates development of the arthropod embryonic ventral midline. We identify two enhancers in the A. aegypti sim locus and demonstrate that they function equivalently in both transgenic flies and transgenic mosquitoes. One A. aegypti enhancer is highly similar to known Drosophila counterparts in its activity, location, and autoregulatory capability. The other differs from any known Drosophila sim enhancers with a novel location, failure to autoregulate, and regulation of expression in a unique subset of midline cells. Our results suggest that the conserved pattern of sim expression in the two species is the result of both conserved and novel regulatory sequences. Further examination of this locus will help to illuminate how the overall regulatory landscape of a conserved developmental gene evolves. AUTHOR SUMMARYThe expression patterns and roles of genes, especially those involved in core developmental processes, are often conserved over vast evolutionary distances. Paradoxically, the DNA sequences surrounding these genes, which contain the cis-regulatory sequences (enhancers) that regulate gene expression, tend to be highly diverged. The manner and extent to which enhancers are functionally conserved, and how the overall organization of regulatory sequences within a locus is preserved or restructured, is not well understood. In this paper, we investigate these questions by identifying enhancers controlling expression of a master nervous system regulatory gene named sim in the mosquito Aedes aegypti, and comparing their functions and locations to those in the well-characterized sim locus of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Our results suggest that the two species generate identical patterns of sim expression through a mix of conserved and novel regulatory sequences. Continued exploration of the sim locus in these two species will help to build a comprehensive picture of how a regulatory locus for a master developmental regulator has evolved.

evolutionary biology↗

Challenges in Improving Genomic Literacy: Results from National and Regional Surveys of Genomic Knowledge, Attitudes, Concerns, and Behaviors

PurposeInformation about genomics is increasingly available to mainstream society, with more and more emphasis on using genomic information to make health care decisions. To determine how prepared people are to use this knowledge to make critical health-related decisions, we assessed the publics level of genomic literacy and whether this knowledge affects their engagement in behaviors related to genomics, such as getting genetic testing. MethodsA survey assessing perceived and actual knowledge, attitudes, concerns, sources of information, and behaviors related to genomics was administered to national and regional samples of participants. A hierarchical linear regression tested whether knowledge and attitudes predicted engagement in behaviors related to genomics. ResultsParticipants had good basic knowledge of genetics, though they were less familiar with the term "the human genome." They also displayed positive attitudes towards genomic research, despite expressing many concerns. Both greater knowledge and more positive attitudes significantly and independently predicted greater engagement in genetic testing and other related proactive health behaviors. ConclusionKnowledge and concerns about genomics impact the publics ability and willingness to obtain genetic testing and engage in other proactive health behaviors. The publics genomic literacy could be enhanced by integrating their knowledge (e.g of DNA) with broader concepts (e.g. the human genome and genomics) and how they relate to health. Future research is needed on interventions that do this, to improve the publics genomic literacy through relationships that build trust

scientific communication and education↗

Reporter gene assays and chromatin-level assays define substantially non-overlapping sets of enhancer sequences

Transcriptional enhancers are essential for gene regulation, but how these regulatory elements are best defined remains a significant unresolved question. Traditional definitions rely on activity-based criteria such as reporter gene assays, while more recently, biochemical assays based on chromatin-level phenomena such as chromatin accessibility, histone modifications, and localized RNA transcription have gained prominence. We examine here whether these two types of definitions effectively identify the same sets of sequences and find that, concerningly, the overlap between the two groups is strikingly limited. Our results raise important questions as to the appropriateness of both old and new enhancer definitions.

genomics↗

Distinct roles and requirements for Ras pathway signaling in visceral versus somatic muscle founder specification

Pleiotropic signaling pathways must somehow engender specific cellular responses. In the Drosophila mesoderm, Ras pathway signaling specifies muscle founder cells from among the broader population of myoblasts. For somatic muscles, this is an inductive process mediated by the ETS-domain downstream Ras effectors Pointed and Aop (Yan). We demonstrate here that for the circular visceral muscles, despite superficial similarities, a significantly different specification mechanism is at work. Not only is visceral founder cell specification not dependent on Pointed or Aop, but Ras pathway signaling in its entirety can be bypassed. Our results show that de-repression, not activation, is the predominant role of Ras signaling in the visceral mesoderm and that accordingly, Ras signaling is not required in the absence of repression. The key repressor acts downstream of the transcription factor Lameduck and is likely a member of the ETS transcription factor family. Our findings fit with a growing body of data that point to a complex interplay between the Ras pathway, ETS transcription factors, and enhancer binding as a critical mechanism for determining unique responses to Ras signaling.\n\nSUMMARYA fundamentally different mechanism is shown for how Ras signaling governs cell fate specification in the Drosophila somatic versus visceral mesoderms, providing insight into how signaling specificity is achieved.

developmental biology↗

Enhancer identification and activity evaluation in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum

Evolution of cis-properties (such as enhancers) often plays an important role in the production of diverse morphology. However, a mechanistic understanding is often limited by the absence of methods to study enhancers in species outside of established model systems. Here, we sought to establish methods to identify and test enhancer activity in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. To identify possible enhancer regions, we first obtained genome-wide chromatin profiles from various tissues and stages of Tribolium via FAIRE (Formaldehyde Assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements)-sequencing. Comparison of these profiles revealed a distinct set of open chromatin regions in each tissue and stage. Second, we established the first reporter assay system that works in both Drosophila and Tribolium, using nubbin in the wing and hunchback in the embryo as case studies. Together, these advances will be useful to study the evolution of cis-language and morphological diversity in Tribolium and other insects.

developmental biology↗