bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hagena, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Hagena, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Brainstem arousal systems adaptively shape large-scale cortical interactions for flexible decision-making

Most perceptual decisions entail a flexible mapping from sensory input to motor output. Flexible input-output mapping is reflected in correlated variability within the cortical network involved in perceptual decisions. Here, we tested the idea that brainstem arousal systems are involved in flexible input-output mapping and changes in cortical correlated variability. We combined brainstem fMRI, pupillometry, and time-resolved assessment of the intrinsic correlations between cortical population codes for stimulus and action. Human participants reported the orientation of visual stimuli by button presses, while the required stimulus-response mapping rule could undergo hidden and unpredictable changes. Rule switches evoked brainstem and pupil responses as well as changes in computational model-inferred, latent variables. These variables governed participants rule-switching behavior and pupil responses. Brainstem activity and pupil dilation preceded increases in the strength of correlations between cortical stimulus and action codes. Brainstem arousal systems may promote the reorganization of sensorimotor cortical pathways for flexible decisions.

neuroscience↗

Large-Scale Circuit Configuration for Flexible Sensory-Motor Decisions

Humans and non-human primates can flexibly switch between different arbitrary mappings from sensation to action to solve a cognitive task. It has remained unknown how the brain implements such flexible sensory-motor mapping rules. Here, we uncovered a dynamic reconfiguration of task-specific correlated variability between sensory and motor brain regions. Human participants switched between two rules for reporting visual orientation judgments during fMRI recordings. Rule switches were either signaled explicitly or inferred by the participants from ambiguous cues. We used behavioral modeling to reconstruct the time course of their belief about the active rule. In both contexts, the patterns of correlations between ongoing fluctuations in stimulus- and action-selective activity across visual and action-related brain regions tracked participants belief about the active rule. The rule-specific correlation patterns broke down around the time of behavioral errors. We conclude that internal beliefs about task state are instantiated in brain-wide, selective patterns of correlated variability.

neuroscience↗