Biology subjects

Haber, J. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Haber, J. E..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

PP2C phosphatases promote autophagy by dephosphorylation of the Atg1 complex

Autophagy is orchestrated by the Atg1-Atg13 complex in budding yeast. Under nutrient-rich conditions, Atg13 is maintained in a hyperphosphorylated state by TORC1 kinase. After nutrient starvation, Atg13 is dephosphorylated, triggering Atg1 kinase activity and autophagy induction. The phosphatases that dephosphorylate Atg13 remain uncharacterized. We show that two redundant PP2C phosphatases, Ptc2 and Ptc3, regulate autophagy via dephosphorylating both Atg13 and Atg1. In the absence of these phosphatases, starvation-induced macroautophagy is inhibited, as is the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting (Cvt) pathway, and the recruitment of the essential autophagy machinery to phagophore assembly sites (PAS) is impaired. Despite prolongation of the DNA damage-induced checkpoint in ptc2{Delta} ptc3{Delta} cells, genotoxin-induced autophagy is also blocked. Creating a genomic atg13-8SA allele under its endogenous promoter, lacking key TORC1 phosphorylation sites, bypasses the autophagy defect in ptc2{Delta} ptc3{Delta} strains. Taken together, these results imply that PP2C type phosphatases promote autophagy by regulating Atg1 complex.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Live cell monitoring of double strand breaks in S. cerevisiae

We have used two different live-cell fluorescent protein markers to monitor the formation and localization of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in budding yeast. Using GFP derivatives of the Rad51 recombination protein or the Ddc2 checkpoint protein, we find that cells with three site-specific DSBs, on different chromosomes, usually display 2 or 3 foci that coalesce and dissociate. Rad51-GFP, by itself, is unable to repair DSBs by homologous recombination in mitotic cells, but is able to form foci and allow repair when heterozygous with a wild type Rad51 protein. The kinetics of disappearance of Rad51-GFP foci parallels the completion of DSB repair. However, in meiosis, Rad51-GFP is proficient when homozygous. Using Ddc2-GFP, we conclude that co-localization of foci following 3 DSBs does not represent formation of a homologous recombination \"repair center,\" as the same distribution of Ddc2-GFP foci was found in the presence or absence of the Rad52 protein. The maintenance of separate DSB foci and much of their dynamics depend on functional microtubules, as addition of nocodazole resulted in a greater population of cells displaying a single focus.\n\nAuthor SummaryDouble strand breaks (DSBs) pose the greatest threat to the fidelity of an organisms genome. While much work has been done on the mechanisms of DSB repair, the arrangement and interaction of multiple DSBs within a single cell remain unclear. Using two live-cell fluorescent DSB markers, we show that cells with 3 site-specific DSBs usually form 2 or 3 foci what can coalesce into fewer foci but also dissociate. The aggregation of DSBs into a single focus does not depend on the Rad52 recombination protein, suggesting that there is no \"repair center\" for homologous recombination. DSB foci are highly dynamic and their dynamic nature is dependent on microtubules.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2017

CRISPR/Cas9 cleavages in budding yeast reveal templated insertions and strand-specific insertion/deletion profiles

Harnessing CRISPR-Cas9 technology has provided an unprecedented ability to modify genomic loci via DNA double-strand break (DSB) induction and repair. We have analyzed nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair induced by Cas9 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and find that the orientation of binding of Cas9 and its guide RNA (gRNA) profoundly influences the pattern of insertion/deletions (indels) at the site of cleavage. A common indel created by Cas9 is a one base pair (+1) insertion that appears to result from Cas9 creating a 1-bp 5 overhang that is filled in by a DNA polymerase and ligated. The origin of +1 insertions was investigated by using two gRNAs with PAM sequences located on opposite DNA strands but designed to cleave the same sequence. These templated +1 insertions are dependent on the X-family DNA polymerase, Pol4. Deleting Pol4 also eliminated +2 and +3 insertions, which were biased toward homonucleotide insertions. Using inverted PAM (iPAM) sequences, we also found significant differences in overall NHEJ efficiency and repair profiles, suggesting that the binding of the Cas9::gRNA complex influences subsequent NHEJ processing. As with well-studied events induced by the site-specific HO endonuclease, CRISPR-Cas9 mediated NHEJ repair depends on the Ku heterodimer and DNA ligase 4. Cas9 events, however, are highly dependent on the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex, independent of Mre11s nuclease activity. Inspection of the outcomes of a large number of Cas9 cleavage events in mammalian cells (van Overbeek et al., 2016) reveals a similar templated origin of +1 insertions in human cells, but also a significant frequency of similarly templated +2 insertions.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Selective and mechanistic sources of recurrent rearrangements across the cancer genome

Cancer cells can acquire profound alterations to the structure of their genomes, including rearrangements that fuse distant DNA breakpoints. We analyze the distribution of somatic rearrangements across the cancer genome, using whole-genome sequencing data from 2,693 tumor-normal pairs. We observe substantial variation in the density of rearrangement breakpoints, with enrichment in open chromatin and sites with high densities of repetitive elements. After accounting for these patterns, we identify significantly recurrent breakpoints (SRBs) at 52 loci, including novel SRBs near BRD4 and AKR1C3. Taking into account both loci fused by a rearrangement, we observe different signatures resembling either single breaks followed by strand invasion or two separate breaks that become joined. Accounting for these signatures, we identify 90 pairs of loci that are significantly recurrently juxtaposed (SRJs). SRJs are primarily tumor-type specific and tend to involve genes with tissue-specific expression. SRJs were frequently associated with disruption of topology-associated domains, juxtaposition of enhancer elements, and increased expression of neighboring genes. Lastly, we find that the power to detect SRJs decreases for short rearrangements, and that reliable detection of all driver SRJs will require whole-genome sequencing data from an order of magnitude more cancer samples than currently available.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Position Effects Influencing Intrachromosomal Repair of a Double-Strand Break in Budding Yeast

Repair of a double-strand break (DSB) by an ectopic homologous donor sequence is subject to the three-dimensional arrangement of chromosomes in the nucleus of haploid budding yeast. The data for interchromosomal recombination suggest that searching for homology is accomplished by a random collision process, strongly influenced by the contact probability of the donor and recipient sequences. Here we explore how recombination occurs on the same chromosome and whether there are additional constraints imposed on repair. Specifically, we examined how intrachromosomal repair is affected by the location of the donor sequence along the 812-kb chromosome 2 (Chr2), with a site-specific DSB created on the right arm (position 625kb). Repair correlates well with contact frequencies determined by chromosome conformation capture-based studies (r = 0.85). Moreover, there is a profound constraint imposed by the anchoring of the centromere (CEN2, position 238kb) to the spindle pole body. Sequences at the same distance on either side of CEN2 are equivalently constrained in recombining with a DSB located more distally on one arm, suggesting that sequences on the opposite arm from the DSB are not otherwise constrained in their interaction with the DSB. The centromere constraint can be partially relieved by inducing transcription through the centromere to inactivate CEN2 tethering. In diploid cells, repair of a DSB via its allelic donor is strongly influenced by the presence and the position of an ectopic intrachromosomal donor.\n\nAuthor SummaryA double-strand break (DSB) on a chromosome can be repaired by recombining with an ectopic homologous donor sequence. Interchromosomal ectopic recombination is strongly influenced by the three-dimensional arrangement of chromosomes in the nucleus of haploid budding yeast, that is strongly influenced by the probability of chemical cross-linking of the donor and recipient sequences. Here we explore how recombination occurs on the same chromosome. We examined how intrachromosomal repair is affected by the location of the donor sequence along the 812-kb chromosome 2 (Chr2), with a site-specific DSB created on the right arm (position 625kb). Repair correlates well with contact frequencies determined by chromosome conformation capture-based studies (r = 0.85). Moreover, there is a profound constraint imposed by the anchoring of the centromere (CEN2, position 238kb) to the spindle pole body. Sequences at the same distance on either side of CEN2 are equivalently accessible in recombining with a DSB located more distally on one arm, suggesting that sequences on the opposite arm from the DSB are not otherwise constrained in their interaction with the DSB. The centromere constraint can be partially relieved by inducing transcription through the centromere to inactivate CEN2 tethering. In diploid cells, repair of a DSB via its allelic donor is strongly influenced by the presence and the position of an ectopic intrachromosomal donor.

genetics↗