bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Gupta, H. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Gupta, H. P..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Decoding neuronal wiring by joint inference of cell identity and synaptic connectivity

Animal behaviors are executed by motor neurons (MNs), which receive information from complex pre-motor neuron (preMN) circuits and output commands to muscles. How motor circuits are established during development remains an important unsolved problem in neuroscience. Here we focus on the development of the motor circuits that control the movements of the adult legs in Drosophila melanogaster. After generating single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) datasets for leg MNs at multiple time points, we describe the time course of gene expression for multiple gene families. This analysis reveals that transcription factors (TFs) and cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) appear to drive the molecular diversity between individual MNs. In parallel, we introduce ConnectionMiner, a novel computational tool that integrates scRNAseq data with electron microscopy-derived connectomes. ConnectionMiner probabilistically refines ambiguous cell type annotations by leveraging neural wiring patterns, and, in turn, it identifies combinatorial gene expression signatures that correlate with synaptic connectivity strength. Applied to the Drosophila leg motor system, ConnectionMiner yields a comprehensive transcriptional annotation of both MNs and preMNs and uncovers candidate effector gene combinations that likely orchestrate the assembly of neural circuits from preMNs to MNs and ultimately to muscles.

neuroscience↗

Cis inhibition of co-expressed DIPs and Dprs shapes neural development

In Drosophila, two interacting adhesion protein families, Dprs and DIPs, coordinate the assembly of neural networks. While intercellular DIP/Dpr interactions have been well characterized, DIPs and Dprs are often co-expressed within the same cells, raising the question as to whether they also interact in cis. We show, in cultured cells and in vivo, that DIP- and DIP-{delta} can interact in cis with their ligands, Dpr6/10 and Dpr12, respectively. When co-expressed in cis with their cognate partners, these Dprs regulate the extent of trans binding, presumably through competitive cis interactions. We demonstrate the neurodevelopmental effects of cis inhibition in fly motor neurons and in the mushroom body. We further show that a long disordered region of DIP- at the C-terminus is required for cis but not trans interactions, likely because it alleviates geometric constraints on cis binding. Thus, the balance between cis and trans interactions plays a role in controlling neural development.

biochemistry↗

Relationship between luteal size and plasma progesterone concentration in pregnant and non-pregnant Indian crossbred dairy cows

The relationship between luteal size and plasma progesterone concentration in purebred cows has been investigated previously. However, there is limited information on this topic in Indian crossbred cows. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between luteal size parameters (diameter and area) and plasma progesterone concentration in healthy pregnant and non-pregnant Indian crossbred cows. Fifty healthy lactating crossbred cows were artificially inseminated after estrus detection and retrospectively classified into pregnant (n=29) and non-pregnant (n=21) based on the results of ultrasonographic pregnancy diagnosis. Data on luteal diameter, luteal area, and plasma progesterone concentration collected on Days 7, 14, and 20 in non-pregnant cows and on Days 7, 14, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 60 in pregnant cows were analyzed. Spearmans correlation test was used to evaluate the association between the corpus luteum size parameters and the plasma progesterone concentration. Luteal area was positively correlated with plasma progesterone concentration in both pregnant ({rho}=0.48, P<0.001) and non-pregnant ({rho}=0.43, P=0.001) cows. Luteal diameter had a relatively weaker correlation with plasma progesterone concentration in both pregnant ({rho}=0.45, P<0.001) and non-pregnant ({rho}=0.24, P=0.058) cows. These results suggest that luteal area is a better indicator of CL function than luteal diameter in healthy Indian crossbred cows.

physiology↗