Biology subjects

Gunner, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Gunner, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Finding the E-Channel Proton Loading Sites by Calculating the Ensemble of Protonation Microstates

The aerobic electron transfer chain builds a proton gradient by proton coupled electron transfer reactions through multiple proteins. Complex I is the first enzyme in this chain. On transfer of two electrons from NADH to quinone four protons are pumped from the N- (negative, higher pH) to the P- (positive, lower) side. Protons move pthrough three linear antiporter paths, with a few amino acids and waters providing the route and the E-channel, which is a complex of competing paths, with clusters of interconnected protonatable residues. Proton loading sites (PLS) are residues that transiently bind protons as they are transported from N- to P-compartments. PLS can be individual residues or extended clusters. The program MCCE uses Monte Carlos sampling to analyze the E-channel proton binding in equilibrium with individual Molecular Dynamics snapshots from trajectories of Thrmus thermuphillus Complex I in the apo, quinone or quinol bound states. At pH 7, the five E-channel subunits (Nqo4, Nqo7, Nqo8, Nqo10, and Nqo11) have accepted >25,000 protonation microstates, each with different residues protonated. The microstate explosion is tamed by analyzing interconnected clusters of residues along the proton transfer paths. A proton is bound and released to five coupled residues in a cluster on the protein N-side and to six coupled residues in the protein center. Loaded microstates bind protons to sites closer to the P-side in the forward pumping direction. MCCE microstate analysis shows the strong coupling of proton binding amongst individual residues in the two PLS clusters.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2022

Comparison of proton transfer paths to the QA and QB sites of the Rb. sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction centers

The photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers from purple non-sulfur bacteria use light energy to drive the transfer of electrons from cytochrome c to ubiquinone. Ubiquinone bound in the QA site cycles between quinone, QA, and anionic semiquinone, QA*-, being reduced once and never binding protons. In the QB site, ubiquinone is reduced twice by QA*-, binds two protons and is released into the membrane as the quinol, QH2. The network of hydrogen bonds formed in a molecular dynamics trajectory was drawn to investigate proton transfer pathways from the cytoplasm to each quinone binding site. QA is isolated with no path for protons to enter from the surface. In contrast, there is a complex and tangled network requiring residues and waters that can bring protons to QB. There are three entries from clusters of surface residues centered around HisH126, GluH224, and HisH68. The network is in good agreement with earlier studies, Mutation of key nodes in the network, such as SerL223, were previously shown to slow proton delivery. Mutational studies had also shown that double mutations of residues such as Asp M17 and AspL210 along multiple paths in the network presented here slow the reaction, while single mutations do not. Likewise, mutation of both HisH126 and HisH128, which are at the entry to two paths reduce the rate of proton uptake.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2022

Characterizing protein protonation microstates using Monte Carlo sampling

Proteins are polyelectrolytes with acidic or basic amino acids making up {approx}25% of the residues. The protonation state of all Asp, Glu, Arg, Lys, His and other protonatable residues, cofactors and ligands define each protonation microstate. As all of these residues will not be fully ionized or neutral, proteins exist in a mixture of microstates. The microstate distribution changes with pH. As the protein environment modifies the proton affinity of each site the distribution may also change in different reaction intermediates or as ligands are bound. Particular protonation microstates may be required for function, while others exist simply because there are many states with similar energy. Here, the protonation microstates generated in Monte Carlo sampling in MCCE are characterized in HEW lysozyme as a function of pH and bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) in different reaction intermediates. The lowest energy and highest probability microstates are compared. The {Delta}G, {Delta}H and {Delta}S between the four protonation states of Glu35 and Asp52 in lysozyme are shown to be calculated with reasonable precision. A weighted Pearson correlation analysis identifies coupling between residue protonation states in RCs and how they change when the quinone in the QB site is reduced.

biophysics↗