bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Guilbaud, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Guilbaud, R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Development of the 4TREE SNP array, a forest multispecies array to enhance European Breeding and conservation programs in pine, poplar and ash.

Within the framework of the European Adaptive BREEDING for Better FORESTs project (B4EST, https://b4est.eu/), we have developed genotyping tools for Poplar, Ash, and Pine forest tree species. SNP arrays are attractive genotyping tools because of the user-friendly genotype calling system and the robust transferability among laboratories. Here we describe the development of an Axiom SNP array for Pinus pinaster (13,407 SNPs), Pinus pinea (5,671 SNPs), Poplar spp. (13,408 SNPs), and Fraxinus spp. (13,407 SNPs) based on a two-step process. We first assembled a high-density (>100,000 SNPs/species) screening array that served to test a large panel of candidate SNPs on a diversity panel involving at least 120 individual trees per species or species group. In the second step, we selected and combined the most informative SNPs to build the final 50,000 SNP 4TREE array. This approach resulted in high genotyping success rates, including for species lacking previously validated high-quality SNP resources. The 4TREE SNP array provides a valuable and transferable genomic tool to support genomic prediction, breeding, and adaptive management of forest tree species.

genomics↗

Oxford Nanopore and Bionano Genomics technologies evaluation for plant structural variation detection.

BackgroundStructural Variations (SVs) are very diverse genomic rearrangements. In the past, their detection was restricted to cytological approaches, then to NGS read size and partitionned assemblies. Due to the current capabilities of technologies such as long read sequencing and optical mapping, larger SVs detection are becoming more and more accessible. This study proposes a comparison in SVs detection and characterization from long-read sequencing obtained with the MinION device developed by Oxford Nanopore Technologies and from optical mapping produced by the Saphyr device commercialized by Bionano Genomics. The genomes of the two Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes Columbia-0 (Col-0) and Landsberg erecta 1 (Ler-1) were chosen to guide the use of one or the other technology. ResultsWe described the SVs detected from the alignment of the best ONT assembly and DLE-1 optical maps of A. thaliana Ler-1 on the public reference Col-0 TAIR10.1. After filtering, 1 184 and 591 Ler-1 SVs were retained from ONT and BioNano technologies respectively. A total of 948 Ler-1 ONT SVs (80.1%) corresponded to 563 Bionano SVs (95.3%) leading to 563 common locations in both technologies. The specific locations were scrutinized to assess improvement in SV detection by either technology. The ONT SVs were mostly detected near TE and gene features, and resistance genes seemed particularly impacted. ConclusionsStructural variations linked to ONT sequencing error were removed and false positives limited, with high quality Bionano SVs being conserved. When compared with the Col-0 TAIR10.1 reference, most of detected SVs were found in same locations. ONT assembly sequence leads to more specific SVs than Bionano one, the later being more efficient to characterize large SVs. Even if both technologies are obvious complementary approaches, ONT data appears to be more adapted to large scale populations study, while Bionano performs better in improving assembly and describing specificity of a genome compared to a reference.

genomics↗