bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Grzybowski, A. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Grzybowski, A. T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

TRAILBLAZER: generative multicellular perturbation model of biology

Single-cell foundation models are reshaping biology by learning transferable representations of cellular state from millions of profiles. These models support annotation, denoising, cross-modal mapping and, increasingly, prediction of responses to genetic or pharmacological perturbations. Despite this progress, most approaches treat cells as independent observations and ignore the multicellular context that governs tissue behavior. Models trained on aggregated datasets often fail to generalize to new donors, laboratories or interventions, in part because their latent spaces lack structure for composition and extrapolation. As a result, strong reconstruction performance does not guarantee accurate forecasting of system-level responses. The general problem addressed here is how to construct a scalable model that predicts multicellular, patient-level responses to interventions while preserving single-cell resolution and enabling generalization beyond observed conditions. Here we show that TRAILBLAZER, a multicellular transformer encoder coupled to an explicitly shaped hyperspherical latent space and a count-aware generative decoder, enables accurate zero-shot prediction of perturbation responses and ranking of candidate immunomodulators at patient resolution. In contrast to prior single-cell or pseudo-bulk approaches, TRAILBLAZER models tissues as coordinated systems using latent tokens that summarize and redistribute global context while maintaining near-linear scaling with group size. By organizing latent geometry around shared healthy references and calibrated mechanistic directions, the model renders vector arithmetic biologically meaningful and supports extrapolation to unseen agents. Together, these results establish a practical framework for mechanism-aware simulation of multicellular responses and suggest a path toward predictive foundation models for therapeutic discovery.

systems biology↗

Re-evaluating the role of nucleosomal bivalency in early development

Nucleosomes, composed of DNA and histone proteins, represent the fundamental repeating unit of the eukaryotic genome1; posttranslational modifications of these histone proteins influence the activity of the associated genomic regions to regulate cell identity2-4. Traditionally, trimethylation of histone 3-lysine 4 (H3K4me3) is associated with transcriptional initiation5-10, whereas trimethylation of H3K27 (H3K27me3) is considered transcriptionally repressive11-15. The apparent juxtaposition of these opposing marks, termed "bivalent domains"16-18, was proposed to specifically demarcate of small set transcriptionally-poised lineage-commitment genes that resolve to one constituent modification through differentiation, thereby determining transcriptional status19-22. Since then, many thousands of studies have canonized the bivalency model as a chromatin hallmark of development in many cell types. However, these conclusions are largely based on chromatin immunoprecipitations (ChIP) with significant methodological problems hampering their interpretation. Absent direct quantitative measurements, it has been difficult to evaluate the strength of the bivalency model. Here, we present reICeChIP, a calibrated sequential ChIP method to quantitatively measure H3K4me3/H3K27me3 bivalency genome-wide, addressing the limitations of prior measurements. With reICeChIP, we profile bivalency through the differentiation paradigm that first established this model16,18: from naive mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) into neuronal progenitor cells (NPCs). Our results cast doubt on every aspect of the bivalency model; in this context, we find that bivalency is widespread, does not resolve with differentiation, and is neither sensitive nor specific for identifying poised developmental genes or gene expression status more broadly. Our findings caution against interpreting bivalent domains as specific markers of developmentally poised genes.

molecular biology↗