bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Grinage, A. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Grinage, A. D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Diversity of the dwarf palmetto: A phylogeographic analysis of the North American coastal plain and investigation of stem polymorphism in Sabal minor (Jacq.) Pers.

Premise of the studySabal minor is considered one of two cold tolerant palm species, inhabiting riparian zones in temperate and subtropical North America. Ecologically it is often overlooked due to its short compact underground stem that makes it appear stemless, or acaulescent. However, across the central US Gulf Coast S. minor is polymorphic for trunk type, with some individuals identified as caulescent, bearing an above-ground trunk that can reach up to two meters in height. MethodsWe adopt a population genomics approach to characterize the genetic diversity of S. minor and to identify whether the caulescent and acaulescent forms of this temperate palm represent phenotypic variation within a single species. Key resultsThe caulescent and acaulescent forms are not reciprocally monophyletic, suggesting these two forms are phenotypic variants of a single species, S. minor s.l. Genetic clustering does not correspond to stem phenotype but rather reflects five discrete biogeographic clusters that span the native range. These geographic clusters indicate phylogeographic breaks along the Tombigbee River with a history that appears to be influenced by the delta of the Mississippi River. Two ecologically divergent populations, one in White Lake and another in Central Texas, show high genetic differentiation from surrounding populations indicating the presence of ecological barriers to gene flow. ConclusionsPopulation genetic structure of S. minor does not reflect stem morphotype (caulescence or acaulescence) supporting the current taxonomic recognition of one polymorphic species rather than two. However, populations of S. minor show genetic structuring corresponding to known phylogeographic barriers illustrating the dynamic roles regional landscape features played in shaping contemporary S. minor.

evolutionary biology↗

Comparative phylogenomic analyses of SNP versus full locus datasets: insights and recommendations for researchers

PremiseIn phylogenomic analyses, no consensus exists on whether using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or including flanking regions (full locus) is best, nor how strictly missing data should be filtered. Moreover, empirical evidence on whether SNP-only trees are suitable for downstream phylogenetic comparative methods such as divergence time estimation and ancestral state reconstructions is lacking. MethodsUsing GBS data from 22 taxa of Glycine, we addressed the effects of SNP vs. locus usage and filtering stringency on phylogenomic inference and phylogenetic comparative methods. We compared branch length, node support, and divergence time estimation across eight datasets with varying amounts of missing data and total size. ResultsOur results reveal five aspects of phylogenomic data usage: 1. tree topology is largely congruent regardless of data type or filtering parameters; 2. filtering missing data too strictly reduces the confidence in some relationships; 3. absolute branch lengths vary by two orders of magnitude between datasets; 4. data type and branch length variation have little effect on divergence time estimation; 5. phylograms significantly alter the estimation of ancestral states. DiscussionWhen conducting phylogenomic analyses we recommend not to filter datasets too strictly to minimize the risk of misleading topologies, low support, and inaccurate divergence times.

evolutionary biology↗