Biology subjects

Greenstein, R. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Greenstein, R. A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

The histone chaperone FACT facilitates heterochromatin spreading through regulation of histone turnover and H3K9 methylation states

Heterochromatin formation requires three distinct steps: nucleation, self-propagation (spreading) along the chromosome, and faithful maintenance after each replication cycle. Impeding any of those steps induces heterochromatin defects and improper gene expression. The essential histone chaperone FACT has been implicated in heterochromatin silencing, however, the mechanisms by which FACT engages in this process remain opaque. Here, we pin-pointed its function to the heterochromatin spreading process. FACT impairment reduces nucleation-distal H3K9me3 and HP1/Swi6 accumulation at subtelomeres and derepresses genes in the vicinity of heterochromatin boundaries. FACT promotes spreading by repressing heterochromatic histone turnover, which is crucial for the H3K9me2 to me3 transition that enables spreading. FACT mutant spreading defects are suppressed by removal of the H3K9 methylation antagonist Epe1 via nucleosome stabilization. Together, our study identifies FACT as a histone chaperone that specifically promotes heterochromatin spreading and lends support to the model that regulated histone turnover controls the propagation of epigenetic marks.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2020

Local chromatin context dictates the genetic determinants of the heterochromatin spreading reaction

Heterochromatin spreading, the expansion of gene-silencing structures from DNA-encoded nucleation sites, occurs in distinct settings. Spreading re-establishes gene-poor constitutive heterochromatin every cell cycle, but also invades gene-rich euchromatin de novo to steer cell fate decisions. How chromatin context, i.e. euchromatic, heterochromatic, or different nucleator types, influences the determinants of this process remains poorly understood. By screening a nuclear function gene deletion library in fission yeast using a previously established heterochromatin spreading sensor system, we identified regulators that positively or negatively alter the propensity of a nucleation site to spread heterochromatin. We find that different chromatin contexts are dependent on unique sets of genes for the regulation of heterochromatin spreading. Further, we find that spreading in constitutive heterochromatin requires Clr6 histone deacetylase complexes containing the Fkh2 transcription factor, while the Clr3 deacetylase is globally required for silencing. Fkh2 acts by recruiting Clr6 to nucleation-distal chromatin sites. Our results segregate the pathways that control lateral heterochromatin spreading from those that instruct DNA-directed assembly in nucleation.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Set1/COMPASS repels heterochromatin invasion at euchromatic sites by disrupting Suv39/Clr4 activity and nucleosome stability

Protection of euchromatin from invasion by gene-repressive heterochromatin is critical for cellular health and viability. In addition to constitutive loci such as pericentromeres and subtelomeres, heterochromatin can be found interspersed in gene-rich euchromatin, where it regulates gene expression pertinent to cell fate. While hetero- and euchromatin are globally poised for mutual antagonism, the mechanisms underlying precise spatial encoding of heterochromatin containment within euchromatic sites remain opaque. We investigated ectopic heterochromatin invasion by manipulating the fission yeast mating type locus boundary, using a single-cell spreading reporter system. We found that heterochromatin repulsion is locally encoded by Set1/COMPASS on certain actively transcribed genes and that this protective role is most prominent at heterochromatin islands, small domains interspersed in euchromatin that regulate cell fate specifiers. Interestingly, this effect can be gene orientation dependent. Sensitivity to invasion by heterochromatin, surprisingly, is not dependent on Set1 altering overall gene expression levels. At least two independent pathways direct this Set1 activity-inhibition of catalysis by Suv39/Clr4 and disruption of nucleosome stability. Taken together, these results describe a mechanism for spatial encoding of euchromatic signals that repel heterochromatin invasion.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

A memory element imposes epigenetic behavior on intrinsically labile RNAi-induced heterochromatin spread.

ABTRACTThe heterochromatin spreading reaction is a central contributor to the formation of gene-repressive structures, which are re-established with high fidelity following replication. The high fidelity of this process is not obviously encoded in the primary spreading reaction. To resolve origins of stable inheritance of repression, we probed the intrinsic fidelity of spreading events in fission yeast using a system that quantitatively describes the spreading reaction in live single cells. We show that spreading from RNAi-nucleated elements is stochastic, multimodal, and fluctuates dynamically across time. In contrast, a second form of spreading, nucleated by the cis-acting element REIII, is deterministic, has high memory capacity and acts as the source of locus fidelity. REIII enables fidelity in part by endowing the locus with resistance to perturbations. Together, our results suggest that epigenetic capacity may not be intrinsically encoded in the spreading reaction, but rather requires collaboration with specialized memory elements.

genetics↗