bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Greene, C. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Greene, C. S..

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

A publishing infrastructure for AI-assisted academic authoring

In this work we investigate how models with advanced natural language processing capabilities can be used to reduce the time-consuming process of writing and revising scholarly manuscripts. To this end, we integrate large language models into the Manubot publishing ecosystem to suggest revisions for scholarly text. We tested our AI-based revision workflow in three case studies of existing manuscripts, including the present one. Our results suggest that these models can capture the concepts in the scholarly text and produce high-quality revisions that improve clarity. Given the amount of time that researchers put into crafting prose, we anticipate that this advance will revolutionize the type of knowledge work performed by academics.

scientific communication and education↗

Hetnet connectivity search provides rapid insights into how two biomedical entities are related

Hetnets, short for "heterogeneous networks", contain multiple node and relationship types and offer a way to encode biomedical knowledge. One such example, Hetionet connects 11 types of nodes -- including genes, diseases, drugs, pathways, and anatomical structures -- with over 2 million edges of 24 types. Previous work has demonstrated that supervised machine learning methods applied to such networks can identify drug repurposing opportunities. However, a training set of known relationships does not exist for many types of node pairs, even when it would be useful to examine how nodes of those types are meaningfully connected. For example, users may be curious not only how metformin is related to breast cancer, but also how the GJA1 gene might be involved in insomnia. We developed a new procedure, termed hetnet connectivity search, that proposes important paths between any two nodes without requiring a supervised gold standard. The algorithm behind connectivity search identifies types of paths that occur more frequently than would be expected by chance (based on node degree alone). We find that predictions are broadly similar to those from previously described supervised approaches for certain node type pairs. Scoring of individual paths is based on the most specific paths of a given type. Several optimizations were required to precompute significant instances of node connectivity at the scale of large knowledge graphs. We implemented the method on Hetionet and provide an online interface at https://het.io/search. We provide an open source implementation of these methods in our new Python package named hetmatpy.

bioinformatics↗

The probability of edge existence due to node degree: a baseline for network-based predictions

Important tasks in biomedical discovery such as predicting gene functions, gene-disease associations, and drug repurposing opportunities are often framed as network edge prediction. The number of edges connecting to a node, termed degree, can vary greatly across nodes in real biomedical networks, and the distribution of degrees varies between networks. If degree strongly influences edge prediction, then imbalance or bias in the distribution of degrees could lead to nonspecific or misleading predictions. We introduce a network permutation framework to quantify the effects of node degree on edge prediction. Our framework decomposes performance into the proportions attributable to degree and the networks specific connections. We discover that performance attributable to factors other than degree is often only a small portion of overall performance. Degrees predictive performance diminishes when the networks used for training and testing--despite measuring the same biological relationships--were generated using distinct techniques and hence have large differences in degree distribution. We introduce the permutation-derived edge prior as the probability that an edge exists based only on degree. The edge prior shows excellent discrimination and calibration for 20 biomedical networks (16 bipartite, 3 undirected, 1 directed), with AUROCs frequently exceeding 0.85. Researchers seeking to predict new or missing edges in biological networks should use the edge prior as a baseline to identify the fraction of performance that is nonspecific because of degree. We released our methods as an open-source Python package (https://github.com/hetio/xswap/).

bioinformatics↗

The Field-Dependent Nature of PageRank Values in Citation Networks

The value of scientific research can be easier to assess at the collective level than at the level of individual contributions. Several journal-level and article-level metrics aim to measure the importance of journals or individual manuscripts. However, many are citation-based and citation practices vary between fields. To account for these differences, scientists have devised normalization schemes to make metrics more comparable across fields. We use PageRank as an example metric and examine the extent to which field-specific citation norms drive estimated importance differences. In doing so, we recapitulate differences in journal and article PageRanks between fields. We also find that manuscripts shared between fields have different PageRanks depending on which fields citation network the metric is calculated in. We implement a degree-preserving graph shuffling algorithm to generate a null distribution of similar networks and find differences more likely attributed to field-specific preferences than citation norms. Our results suggest that while differences exist between fields metric distributions, applying metrics in a field-aware manner rather than using normalized global metrics avoids losing important information about article preferences. They also imply that assigning a single importance value to a manuscript may not be a useful construct, as the importance of each manuscript varies by the readers field.

scientific communication and education↗

Performance of computational algorithms to deconvolve heterogeneous bulk tumor tissue depends on experimental factors

BackgroundSingle-cell gene expression profiling provides unique opportunities to understand tumor heterogeneity and the tumor microenvironment. Because of cost and feasibility, profiling bulk tumors remains the primary population-scale analytical strategy. Many algorithms can deconvolve these tumors using single-cell profiles to infer their composition. While experimental choices do not change the true underlying composition of the tumor, they can affect the measurements produced by the assay. ResultsWe generated a dataset of high-grade serous ovarian tumors with paired expression profiles from using multiple strategies to examine the extent to which experimental factors impact the results of downstream tumor deconvolution methods. We find that pooling samples for single-cell sequencing and subsequent demultiplexing has a minimal effect. We identify dissociation-induced differences that affect cell composition, leading to changes that may compromise the assumptions underlying some deconvolution algorithms. We also observe differences across mRNA enrichment methods that introduce additional discrepancies between the two data types. We also find that experimental factors change cell composition estimates and that the impact differs by method. ConclusionsPrevious benchmarks of deconvolution methods have largely ignored experimental factors. We find that methods vary in their robustness to experimental factors. We provide recommendations for methods developers seeking to produce the next generation of deconvolution approaches and for scientists designing experiments using deconvolution to study tumor heterogeneity.

bioinformatics↗

Changing word meanings in biomedical literature reveal pandemics and new technologies

While we often think of words as having a fixed meaning that we use to describe a changing world, words are also dynamic and changing. Scientific research can also be remarkably fast-moving, with new concepts or approaches rapidly gaining mind share. We examined scientific writing, both preprint and pre-publication peer-reviewed text, to identify terms that have changed and examine their use. One particular challenge that we faced was that the shift from closed to open access publishing meant that the size of available corpora changed by over an order of magnitude in the last two decades. We developed an approach to evaluate semantic shift by accounting for both intra- and inter-year variability using multiple integrated models. Using this strategy and examining year-by-year changes revealed thousands of change points in both corpora. We found change points for tokens including cas9, pandemic, and sars among many others. The consistent change-points between pre-publication peer-reviewed and preprinted text were largely related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We developed a web app for exploration (https://greenelab.github.io/word-lapse/) that enables users to investigate individual terms. To our knowledge, this analysis is the first to examine semantic shift in biomedical preprints and pre-publication peer-reviewed text, and it lays the foundation for future work to examine how terms acquire new meaning and the extent to which that process is encouraged or discouraged by peer review.

scientific communication and education↗

The Effects of Nonlinear Signal on Expression-Based Prediction Performance

Those building predictive models from transcriptomic data are faced with two conflicting perspectives. The first, based on the inherent high dimensionality of biological systems, supposes that complex non-linear models such as neural networks will better match complex biological systems. The second, imagining that complex systems will still be well predicted by simple dividing lines prefers linear models that are easier to interpret. We compare multi-layer neural networks and logistic regression across multiple prediction tasks on GTEx and Recount3 datasets and find evidence in favor of both possibilities. We verified the presence of non-linear signal for transcriptomic prediction tasks by removing the predictive linear signal with Limma, and showed the removal ablated the performance of linear methods but not non-linear ones. However, we also found that the presence of non-linear signal was not necessarily sufficient for neural networks to outperform logistic regression. Our results demonstrate that while multi-layer neural networks may be useful for making predictions from gene expression data, including a linear baseline model is critical because while biological systems are highdimensional, effective dividing lines for predictive models may not be.

bioinformatics↗

An efficient not-only-linear correlation coefficient based on machine learning

Correlation coefficients are widely used to identify patterns in data that may be of particular interest. In transcriptomics, genes with correlated expression often share functions or are part of disease-relevant biological processes. Here we introduce the Clustermatch Correlation Coefficient (CCC), an efficient, easy-to-use and not-only-linear coefficient based on machine learning models. CCC reveals biologically meaningful linear and nonlinear patterns missed by standard, linear-only correlation coefficients. CCC captures general patterns in data by comparing clustering solutions while being much faster than state-of-the-art coefficients such as the Maximal Information Coefficient. When applied to human gene expression data, CCC identifies robust linear relationships while detecting nonlinear patterns associated, for example, with sex differences that are not captured by linear-only coefficients. Gene pairs highly ranked by CCC were enriched for interactions in integrated networks built from protein-protein interaction, transcription factor regulation, and chemical and genetic perturbations, suggesting that CCC could detect functional relationships that linear-only methods missed. CCC is a highly-efficient, next-generation not-only-linear correlation coefficient that can readily be applied to genome-scale data and other domains across different data types.

bioinformatics↗

Compendium-wide analysis of P. aeruginosa core and accessory genes reveal more nuanced transcriptional patterns

Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an opportunistic pathogen that causes difficult to treat infections, have significant genomic heterogeneity including the presence of diverse accessory genes that are only present in some strains or clades. Both core genes, which are conserved across strains, and accessory genes have been associated with traits such as biofilm formation and virulence. Much of what we know about core and accessory gene content comes from genome analyses. Here, we use a newly assembled transcriptome compendium to analyze the transcriptional patterns of core and accessory gene expression in PAO1 and PA14 strains across thousands of samples from hundreds of distinct experiments. We found that a subset of core genes were stable, having consistent correlated expression patterns across samples regardless of strain background, with a focus on strains PAO1 and PA14. These stable core genes had fewer co-expressed neighbors that were accessory genes. SignificancePseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous pathogen. There is a lot of diversity amongst P. aeruginosa strains, some which are clinically relevant. Understanding how these different strain-level traits manifest is important for identifying targets that regulate different traits of interest. With the availability of a PAO1-mapped and PA14-mapped RNA-seq compendium, which contain hundreds of strains, it is now possible to examine the effect of different strains on expression, which can mediate different traits. In this study we developed an approach to compare expression profiles across different P. aeruginosa gene groups - core and accessory genes. This approach revealed a subset of core genes with different transcriptional patterns across strains, which could contribute to trait differences.

bioinformatics↗

wenda_gpu: fast domain adaptation for genomic data

MotivationDomain adaptation allows for development of predictive models even in cases with limited sample data. Weighted elastic net domain adaptation specifically leverages features of genomic data to maximize transferability but the method is too computationally demanding to apply to many genome-sized datasets. ResultsWe developed wenda_gpu, which uses GPyTorch to train models on genomic data within hours on a single GPU-enabled machine. We show that wenda_gpu returns comparable results to the original wenda implementation, and that it can be used for improved prediction of cancer mutation status on small sample sizes than regular elastic net. Availabilitywenda_gpu is available on GitHub at https://github.com/greenelab/wenda_gpu/. Contactcasey.s.greene@cuanschutz.edu Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

bioinformatics↗

Computationally efficient assembly of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa gene expression compendium

Over the past two decades, thousands of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) gene expression profiles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been made publicly available via the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA). In the work we present here, we draw on over 2,300 P. aeruginosa transcriptomes from hundreds of studies performed by over seventy-five different research groups. We first developed a pipeline, using the Salmon pseudo-aligner and two different P. aeruginosa reference genomes (strains PAO1 and PA14), that transformed raw sequence data into a uniformly processed data in the form of sample-wise normalized counts. In this workflow, P. aeruginosa RNA-seq data are filtered using technically and biologically driven criteria with characteristics tailored to bacterial gene expression and that account for the effects of alignment to different reference genomes. The filtered data are then normalized to enable cross experiment comparisons. Finally, annotations are programmatically collected for those samples with sufficient meta-data and expression-based metrics are used to further enhance strain assignment for each sample. Our processing and quality control methods provide a scalable framework for taking full advantage of the troves of biological information hibernating in the depths of microbial gene expression data. The re-analysis of these data in aggregate is a powerful approach for hypothesis generation and testing, and this approach can be applied to transcriptome datasets in other species. SignificancePseudomonas aeruginosa causes a wide range of infections including chronic infections associated with cystic fibrosis. P. aeruginosa infections are difficult to treat and people with CF-associated P. aeruginosa infections often have poor clinical outcomes. To aid the study of this important pathogen, we developed a methodology that facilitates analyses across experiments, strains, and conditions. We aligned, filtered for quality and normalized thousands of P. aeruginosa RNA-seq gene expression profiles that were publicly available via the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA). The workflow that we present can be efficiently scaled to incorporate new data and applied to the analysis of other species.

microbiology↗

Prediction of cancer mutation states using multiple data modalities reveals the utility and consistency of gene expression and DNA methylation

In studies of cellular function in cancer, researchers are increasingly able to choose from many -omics assays as functional readouts. Choosing the correct readout for a given study can be difficult, and which layer of cellular function is most suitable to capture the relevant signal may be unclear. In this study, we consider prediction of cancer mutation status (presence or absence) from functional -omics data as a representative problem. Since functional signatures of cancer mutation have been identified across many data types, this problem presents an opportunity to quantify and compare the ability of different -omics readouts to capture signals of dysregulation in cancer. The TCGA Pan-Cancer Atlas contains genetic alteration data including somatic mutations and copy number variants (CNVs), as well as several -omics data types. From TCGA, we focus on RNA sequencing, DNA methylation arrays, reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA), microRNA, and somatic mutational signatures as -omics readouts. Across a collection of genes recurrently mutated in cancer, RNA sequencing tends to be the most effective predictor of mutation state. Surprisingly, we found that for many of the genes we considered, one or more other data types are approximately equally effective predictors. Performance was more variable between mutations than it was between data types for the same mutation, and there was often little difference between the top data types. We also found that combining data types into a single multi-omics model provided little or no improvement in predictive ability over the best individual data type. Based on our results, for the design of studies focused on the functional outcomes of cancer mutations, there are often multiple -omics types that can serve as effective readouts, although gene expression seems to be a reasonable default option.

bioinformatics↗

Projecting genetic associations through gene expression patterns highlights disease etiology and drug mechanisms

Genes act in concert with each other in specific contexts to perform their functions. Determining how these genes influence complex traits requires a mechanistic understanding of expression regulation across different conditions. It has been shown that this insight is critical for developing new therapies. In this regard, the role of individual genes in disease-relevant mechanisms can be hypothesized with transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS), which have represented a significant step forward in testing the mediating role of gene expression in GWAS associations. However, modern models of the architecture of complex traits predict that gene-gene interactions play a crucial role in disease origin and progression. Here we introduce PhenoPLIER, a computational approach that maps gene-trait associations and pharmacological perturbation data into a common latent representation for a joint analysis. This representation is based on modules of genes with similar expression patterns across the same conditions. We observed that diseases were significantly associated with gene modules expressed in relevant cell types, and our approach was accurate in predicting known drug-disease pairs and inferring mechanisms of action. Furthermore, using a CRISPR screen to analyze lipid regulation, we found that functionally important players lacked TWAS associations but were prioritized in trait-associated modules by PhenoPLIER. By incorporating groups of co-expressed genes, PhenoPLIER can contextualize genetic associations and reveal potential targets missed by single-gene strategies.

bioinformatics↗

Analysis of scientific journalism in Nature reveals gender and regional disparities in coverage

Science journalism is a critical way for the public to learn about and benefit from scientific findings. Such journalism shapes the publics view of the current state of science and legitimizes experts. Journalists can only cite and quote a limited number of sources, who they may discover in their research, including recommendations by other scientists. Biases in either process may influence who is identified and ultimately included as a source. To examine potential biases in science journalism, we analyzed 22,001 non-research articles published by Nature and compared these with Nature-published research articles with respect to predicted gender and name origin. We extracted cited authors names and those of quoted speakers. While citations and quotations within a piece do not reflect the entire information-gathering process, they can provide insight into the demographics of visible sources. We then predicted gender and name origin of the cited authors and speakers. We compared articles with a comparator set made up of first and last authors within primary research articles in Nature and a subset of Springer Nature articles in the same time period. In our analysis, we found a skew toward quoting men in Nature science journalism. However, quotation is trending toward equal representation at a faster rate than authorship rates in academic publishing. Gender disparity in Nature quotes was dependent on the article type. We found a significant over-representation of names with predicted Celtic/English origin and under-representation of names with a predicted East Asian origin in both in extracted quotes and journal citations but dampened in citations.

scientific communication and education↗

GenomicSuperSignature: interpretation of RNA-seq experiments through robust, efficient comparison to public databases

Millions of transcriptomic profiles have been deposited in public archives, yet remain underused for the interpretation of new experiments. We present a novel method for interpreting new transcriptomic datasets through near-instantaneous comparison to public archives without high-performance computing requirements. We performed Principal Component Analysis on 536 studies comprising 44,890 RNA sequencing profiles. Sufficiently similar loading vectors were aggregated to form Replicable Axes of Variation (RAV). RAVs were annotated with metadata of originating studies and samples and by gene set enrichment analysis. Functionality to associate new datasets with RAVs, extract interpretable annotations, and provide intuitive visualization are implemented as the GenomicSuperSignature R/Bioconductor package. We demonstrated the efficient and coherent database searching, robustness to batch effects and heterogeneous training data, and transfer learning capacity of our method using TCGA and rare diseases datasets. GenomicSuperSignature will aid analyzing new gene expression data in the context of existing databases using minimal computing resources. PURPOSEMillions of transcriptomic profiles have been deposited in public archives, yet remain underused for the interpretation of new experiments. Existing methods for leveraging these public resources have focused on the reanalysis of existing data or analysis of new datasets independently. We present a novel approach to interpreting new transcriptomic datasets by near-instantaneous comparison to public archives without high-performance computing requirements. METHODSTo identify replicable and interpretable axes of variation in any given gene expression dataset, we performed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on 536 studies comprising 44,890 RNA sequencing profiles. Sufficiently similar loading vectors, when compared across studies, were aggregated to form Replicable Axes of Variation (RAV). RAVs were annotated with metadata of originating studies and samples and by gene set enrichment analysis. Functionality to associate new datasets with RAVs, extract interpretable annotations, and provide intuitive visualization are implemented as the GenomicSuperSignature R/Bioconductor package. RESULTSRAVs are robust to batch effects and the presence of low-quality or irrelevant studies, and identify signals that can be lost by merging samples across the training datasets. The GenomicSuperSignature package allows instantaneous matching of PCA axes in new datasets to pre-computed RAVs, cutting down the analysis time from days to the order of seconds on an ordinary laptop. We demonstrate that RAVs associated with a phenotype can provide insight into weak or indirectly measured biological attributes in a new study by leveraging accumulated data from published datasets. Benchmarking against complementary previous works demonstrates that the RAV index 1) identifies colorectal carcinoma transcriptome subtypes that are similar to but more correlated with clinicopathological characteristics than previous disease-specific efforts and 2) can estimate neutrophil counts through transfer learning on new data comparably to the previous efforts despite major differences in training datasets and model building processes with the additional benefits of flexibility and scalability of the model application. CONCLUSIONGenomicSuperSignature establishes an information resource and software tools to interrogate it. Prior knowledge databases are coherently linked, enabling researchers to analyze new gene expression data in the context of existing databases using minimal computing resources. The robustness of GenomicSuperSignature suggests that we can expand this approach beyond human gene expression profiles, such as single-cell RNA-seq, microbiome abundance, and different species transcriptomics datasets.

bioinformatics↗

Generative neural networks separate common and specific transcriptional responses

Genome-wide transcriptome profiling identifies genes that are prone to differential expression across contexts ("common DEGs"), as well as genes with changes specific to the experimental manipulation. Distinguishing common DEGs from those that are specifically changed in a context of interest allows more efficient prediction of which genes are specific to a given biological process under scrutiny. Currently, commonly differentially expressed genes or pathways can only be identified through the laborious manual curation of highly controlled experiments, an inordinately time-consuming and impractical endeavor. Here we pioneer an approach for identifying common patterns using generative neural networks. This approach produces a background set of transcriptomic experiments from which a null distribution of gene and pathway changes can be generated. By comparing the set of differentially expressed genes found in a target experiment against the generated background set, common results can be easily separated from specific ones. This "Specific cOntext Pattern Highlighting In Expression data" (SOPHIE) approach is broadly applicable to new platforms or any species with a large collection of gene expression data. We apply SOPHIE to diverse datasets including those from human, human cancer, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. SOPHIE identifies common DEGs in concordance with previously described, manually and systematically determined common DEGs. Further, molecular validation indicates that SOPHIE detects highly specific, but low magnitude, biologically relevant, transcriptional changes. SOPHIEs measure of specificity can complement log fold change values generated from traditional differential expression analyses. For example, by filtering the set of differentially expressed genes, one can identify those genes that are specifically relevant to the experimental condition of interest. Consequently, these results can inform future research directions.

bioinformatics↗

Linguistic Analysis of the bioRxiv Preprint Landscape

Preprints allow researchers to make their findings available to the scientific community before they have undergone peer review. Studies on preprints within bioRxiv have been largely focused on article metadata and how often these preprints are downloaded, cited, published, and discussed online. A missing element that has yet to be examined is the language contained within the bioRxiv preprint repository. We sought to compare and contrast linguistic features within bioRxiv preprints to published biomedical text as a whole as this is an excellent opportunity to examine how peer review changes these documents. The most prevalent features that changed appear to be associated with typesetting and mentions of supplementary sections or additional files. In addition to text comparison, we created document embeddings derived from a preprint-trained word2vec model. We found that these embeddings are able to parse out different scientific approaches and concepts, link unannotated preprint-peer reviewed article pairs, and identify journals that publish linguistically similar papers to a given preprint. We also used these embeddings to examine factors associated with the time elapsed between the posting of a first preprint and the appearance of a peer reviewed publication. We found that preprints with more versions posted and more textual changes took longer to publish. Lastly, we constructed a web application (https://greenelab.github.io/preprint-similarity-search/) that allows users to identify which journals and articles that are most linguistically similar to a bioRxiv or medRxiv preprint as well as observe where the preprint would be positioned within a published article landscape.

bioinformatics↗

miQC: An adaptive probabilistic framework for quality control of single-cell RNA-sequencing data

MotivationSingle-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) has made it possible to profile gene expression in tissues at high resolution. An important preprocessing step prior to performing downstream analyses is to identify and remove cells with poor or degraded sample quality using quality control (QC) metrics. Two widely used QC metrics to identify a low-quality cell are (i) if the cell includes a high proportion of reads that map to mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) encoded genes and (ii) if a small number of genes are detected. Current best practices use these QC metrics independently with either arbitrary, uniform thresholds (e.g. 5%) or biological context-dependent (e.g. species) thresholds, and fail to jointly model these metrics in a data-driven manner. Current practices are often overly stringent and especially untenable on lower-quality tissues, such as archived tumor tissues. ResultsWe propose a data-driven QC metric (miQC) that jointly models both the proportion of reads mapping to mtDNA genes and the number of detected genes with mixture models in a probabilistic framework to predict the low-quality cells in a given dataset. We demonstrate how our QC metric easily adapts to different types of single-cell datasets to remove low-quality cells while preserving high-quality cells that can be used for downstream analyses. AvailabilitySoftware available at https://github.com/greenelab/miQC. The code used to download datasets, perform the analyses, and reproduce the figures is available at https://github.com/greenelab/mito-filtering. ContactStephanie C. Hicks (shicks19@jhu.edu) and Anna Vaharautio (anna.vaharautio@helsinki.fi)

genomics↗