Biology subjects

Gormley, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Gormley, P..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Contribution of rare and common variants to intellectual disability in a high-risk population sub-isolate of Northern Finland

The contribution of de novo and ultra-rare genetic variants in severe and moderate intellectual disability (ID) has been extensively studied whereas the genetic architecture of mild ID has been less well characterized. To elucidate the genetic background of milder ID we studied a regional cohort of 442 ID patients enriched for mild ID (>50%) from a population isolate of Finland. We analyzed rare variants using exome sequencing and CNV genotyping and common variants using common variant polygenic risk scores. As controls we used a Finnish collection of exome sequenced (n=11311) and GWAS chip genotyped (n=11699) individuals.\n\nWe show that rare damaging variants in genes known to be associated with cognitive defects are observed more often in severe (27%) than in mild ID (13%) patients (p-value: 7.0e-4). We further observed a significant enrichment of protein truncating variants in loss-of-function intolerant genes, as well as damaging missense variants in genes not yet associated with cognitive defects (OR: 2.1, p-value: 3e-8). For the first time to our knowledge, we show that a common variant polygenic load significantly contributes to all severity forms of ID. The heritability explained was the highest for educational attainment (EDU) in mild ID explaining 2.2% of the heritability on liability scale. For more severe ID it was lower at 0.6%. Finally, we identified a homozygote variant in the CRADD gene to be a cause of a specific syndrome with ID and pachygyria. The frequency of this variant is 50x higher in the Finnish population than in non-Finnish Europeans, demonstrating the benefits of utilizing population isolates in rare variant analysis of diseases under negative selection.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Common variant burden contributes significantly to the familial aggregation of migraine in 1,589 families

It has long been observed that complex traits, including migraine, often aggregate in families, but the underlying genetic architecture behind this is not well understood. Two competing hypotheses exist, emphasizing either rare or common genetic variation. More specifically, familial aggregation could be predominantly explained by rare, penetrant variants that segregate according to Mendelian inheritance or rather by the sufficient polygenic accumulation of many common variants, each with an individually small effect. Some combination of both common and rare variation could also contribute towards a spectrum of disease risk.\n\nWe investigated this in a collection of 8,319 individuals across 1,589 migraine families from Finland. Family members were individually diagnosed by a migraine-specific questionnaire with either migraine without aura (MO, ICHD-3 code 1.1, n=2,357), migraine with typical aura (ICHD- 3 code 1.2.1, n=2,420), hemiplegic migraine (HM, ICHD-3 code 1.2.3, n=540), or no migraine (n=3,002). For comparison, we used population-based migraine cases (n=1,101) and controls (n=13,369) from the FINRISK study. The disease status of FINRISK individuals was assigned based on health registry data from outpatient clinics and/or prescription medication. All individuals were genotyped on the Illumina(R) CoreExome or PsychArray chip platforms and imputed to a Finnish reference panel of 6,962 haplotypes. Polygenic risk scores (PRS), representing the common variant burden in each individual, were calculated using weights from the most recent large-scale genome-wide association study of migraine. To account for family structure in our analyses, we used a mixed-model approach, adjusting for the genetic relationship matrix as a random effect.\n\nWe found a significantly higher common variant burden in familial cases of migraine (for all subtypes, measured by the odds ratio [OR] per standard deviation [SD] increase in PRS; OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.71-1.81, P = 1.7x10-109) compared to cases from a population cohort (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.25-1.38, P = 7.2x10-17) when using the population controls as a reference group. The highest enrichment was observed for HM (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.86-2.07, P = 8.7x10-36) and migraine with typical aura (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.79-1.91, P = 1.4x10-86) but enrichment was also present for MO (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.51-1.63, P = 1.1x10-48). Comparing within cases, there was no significant difference in common variant burden between the migraine with aura subtypes, HM and migraine with typical aura (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.99-1.19, P = 0.09), but both showed significantly higher enrichment compared to MO (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.17-1.38, P = 7.3x10-7, and OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.11-1.23, P = 4.62x10-5, respectively). Additionally, we found that higher common variant burden corresponded to earlier age of headache onset (OR per SD increase in PRS for 3,631 cases with onset before 20 years old compared to 1,686 cases with onset later than 20 years old; OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.05-1.18, P = 8.3x10-4). FINRISK population cases identified from national health registry data were found to have lower common variant burden in comparison to the familial migraine cases (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.25-1.38, P = 6.8x10-17), unless the individuals had attended both a specialist clinic and also received prophylactic migraine treatment (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.53-1.88, P = 3.9x10-9). Finally, although rare variants have been suggested as the primary cause for familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM), we found only four out of 45 sequenced FHM families (8.9%) with a pathogenic mutation in one of the known risk genes.\n\nIn summary, our results demonstrate a substantial contribution of common polygenic variation to familial aggregation in migraine, comparable to both controls and that observed in migraine cases from a population cohort. The findings also suggest that individuals with migraine aura symptoms (either typical aura, which is mostly visual, or rare motor aura) tend to have higher common variant burden on average supporting the polygenic model also in these migraine subtypes.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Gene family information facilitates variant interpretation and identification of disease-associated genes

Differentiating risk-conferring from benign missense variants, and therefore optimal calculation of gene-variant burden, represent a major challenge in particular for rare and genetic heterogeneous disorders. While orthologous gene conservation is commonly employed in variant annotation, approximately 80% of known disease-associated genes are paralogs and belong to gene families. It has not been thoroughly investigated how gene family information can be utilized for disease gene discovery and variant interpretation. We developed a paralog conservation score to empirically evaluate whether paralog conserved or nonconserved sites of in-human paralogs are important for protein function. Using this score, we demonstrate that disease-associated missense variants are significantly enriched at paralog conserved sites across all disease groups and disease inheritance models tested. Next, we assessed whether gene family information could assist in discovering novel disease-associated genes. We subsequently developed a gene family de novo enrichment framework that identified 43 exome-wide enriched gene families including 98 de novo variant carrying genes in more than 10k neurodevelopmental disorder patients. 33 gene family enriched genes represent novel candidate genes which are brain expressed and variant constrained in neurodevelopmental disorders.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Heterogeneous Contribution of Microdeletions in the Development of Common Generalized and Focal epilepsies

BackgroundMicrodeletions are known to confer risk to epilepsy, particularly at genomic rearrangement \"hotspot\" loci. However, deciphering their role outside hotspots and risk assessment by epilepsy sub-type has not been conducted.\n\nMethodsWe assessed the burden, frequency and genomic content of rare, large microdeletions found in a previously published cohort of 1,366 patients with Genetic Generalized Epilepsy (GGE) plus two sets of additional unpublished genome-wide microdeletions found in 281 Rolandic Epilepsy (RE) and 807 Adult Focal Epilepsy (AFE) patients, totaling 2,454 cases. These microdeletion sets were assessed in a combined analysis and in sub-type specific approaches against 6,746 ethnically matched controls.\n\nResultsWhen hotspots are considered, we detected an enrichment of microdeletions in the combined epilepsy analysis (adjusted-P= 2.00x10-7; OR = 1.89; 95%-CI: 1.51-2.35), where the implicated microdeletions overlapped with rarely deleted genes and those involved in neurodevelopmental processes. Sub-type specific analyses showed that hotspot deletions in the GGE subgroup contribute most of the signal (adjusted-P = 1.22x10-12; OR = 7.45; 95%-CI = 4.20-11.97). Outside hotspot loci, microdeletions were enriched in the GGE cohort for neurodevelopmental genes (adjusted-P = 4.78x10-3; OR = 2.30; 95%-CI = 1.42-3.70), whereas no additional signal was observed for RE and AFE. Still, gene content analysis was able to identify known (NRXN1, RBFOX1 and PCDH7) and novel (LOC102723362) candidate genes affected in more than one epilepsy sub-type but not in controls.\n\nConclusionsOur results show a heterogeneous effect of recurrent and non-recurrent microdeletions as part of the genetic architecture of GGE and a minor to negligible contribution in the etiology of RE and AFE.

genetics↗